· Private foundation
Dyr Family Foundation Inc Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2021
- Under $10k44 grants · $64k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $130k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $123k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Miscellaneous Total | $72,681 |
| BREGLOU RESEARCH INSTITUTION Total | $50,000 |
| Migdal Oz Total | $40,000 |
| RCCS Total | $27,902 |
| Tomche Shabbos of Rockland Total | $11,800 |
| BOCA Total | $10,397 |
| congregation shomrey emu Total | $10,000 |
| chasdei Lev Total | $10,000 |
| Yeshiva University Total | $10,000 |
| Migdal Ozyeshiva gedola tiferes Total | $10,000 |
| Congregation Ateres Rosh Total | $7,895 |
| IMF THE NEXT STEP Total | $5,000 |
| tcf Total | $3,960 |
| CHAI 4 EVer Total | $3,600 |
| our place Total | $3,600 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2021, 5 since wound down; 53 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $317k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZVI LATZADIK DBA BRESLOV RESEARCH INSTITUTE JERUSALEM2× · 2019–2020 · $100k · revenue +11%
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZVI LATZADIK BR2× · 2019–2020 · $100k
- BRBreslov Research Center2× · 2017–2018 · $41k
Funded once
- UMUNITED MOSDOS TORAH VEYIRAH YERUSHOLYIM INCone grant, 2017 · $150k
- UMUnited Mosdos Torah Veyirah Yerushalaimone grant, 2018 · $105k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $48k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
To provide financial assistance to jewish educational and charitable causes.
To provide religious Jewish education.
A post-secondary school offering an educational program in talmudic study
Religious Teaching
Provide college level education and extensive background of jewish law and talmudic studies and rabbinical ordination.
Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Fjc · The Arthur & Joyce Fein Family Foundation · The Weiskopf Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Dyr Family Foundation Inc Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dyr Family Foundation Inc Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Dyr Family’s filings →