Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dwayne and Dottie Shannon Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$364k
Granted FY2023
25
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Arts & Culture$161kEducation$123kHuman Services$95kInternational$52kCrime & Legal$48kScience & Tech$47kFood & Nutrition$38kPhilanthropy$20kOther$0
02FY2023 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k7 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $345k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$30,000
WICHITA SALVATION ARMY$30,000
WICHITA ART MUSEUM$30,000
EXPLORATION PLACE$25,000
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$25,000
MUSIC THEATER OF ICT$25,000
GRACELAND UNIVERSITY$20,000
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$20,000
WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME$20,000
KANSAS FOOD BANK$20,000
PANDO INITIATIVE$20,000
ULRICH MUSEUM$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
MARK ARTS$10,272
OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $500 → 14%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $20k → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $10k → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $2k → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $500 → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $500 → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $500 → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $500 → 16%PANDO INITIATIVE: $20k → 16%PANDO INITIATIVE: $10k → 16%PANDO INITIATIVE: $3k → 16%PANDO INITIATIVE: $1k → 16%PANDO INITIATIVE: $1k → 16%PANDO INITIATIVE: $1k → 16%PANDO INITIATIVE: $1k → 16%GREATER WICHITA YMCA: $1k → 16%GREATER WICHITA YMCA: $1k → 16%GREATER WICHITA YMCA: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IA
CO
MO
KS
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$694k · 25 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
6

Total granted

$694k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+89%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    Wichita Art Museum Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $53k · revenue +69%
  • WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $52k · revenue +85%
  • EP
    EXPLORATION PLACE INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $47k · revenue +187%

Funded once

  • WF
    WSU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • MT
    MUSIC THEATRE WICHITAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +89%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
2
Wichita Collegiate School

We exist to inspire all students to be the best versions of themselves through a transformative education grounded in academic excellence within our inclusive community.

Education
3
Kansas City Art Institute

The mission of KCAI is to educate artists and designers while honoring the distinct journeys of students. We forge a vibrant community that equips them to become leaders who leverage the creative process to transform the future.

Education
4
Kansas Association of School Boards Inc

To assist local boards of education and related educational entities in their responsibilities to assure a quality public education for all students.

—
5
The Kansas University Alumni Association

We build lifelong relationships that strengthen the university of kansas and the legacy of excellence embodied by its students, alumni, faculty, staff and friends.

Education
6
Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)

—
7
Wichita Regional Chamber of Commerce Inc

To drive economic growth and community advancement in the wichita region.

—
8
Wichita Foundation

The wichita foundation invests in people and ideas to spark change, and envisions a place where all wichitans thrive and belong. as community conveners, the foundation leads with courage, grows equitable relationships, ignites philanthropy…

Philanthropy
9
Wichita Center for Graduate Medical Education Inc

On behalf of the university of kansas school of medicine-wichita, wcgme administers the graduate medical education program for resident physicians in the city of wichita, kansas. wcgme's involvement in graduate medical education in wichita…

Education
10
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
11
Park University

Park university's mission is to transform lives through accessible, student-centered, quality higher education.

Education
12
Whitefield Academy Association

The mission of whitefield academy is to support parents by providing students with a top-tier academic foundation in a joyful, christ-centered community of classical learning.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wichita Public Library Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $62,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWICHITA SALVATION ARMY: $58,000 · OtherWICHITA SALVATION ARMYCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $47,500 · OtherCHILD ADVOCACY CENTERMUSIC THEATER OF ICT: $41,200 · OtherMUSIC THEATER OF ICTIndividual grant recipient: $28,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOUTREACH INTERNATIONAL: $22,000 · OtherOUTREACH INTERNATIONALEASTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $13,000 · Other+7 more: $8,008 · OtherWichita Art Museum Inc: $52,800 · Arts & CultureWichita Art Museum In…EXPLORATION PLACE INC: $46,500 · Arts & CultureEXPLORATION PLACE INCMARK ARTS INC: $28,272 · Arts & CultureMARK ARTS INC+2 more: $4,750 · Arts & CultureWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $51,700 · EducationWICHITA STATE UNIV…GRACELAND UNIVERSITY: $37,000 · EducationGRACELAND UNIVERSI…PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $16,500 · EducationPHILLIPS FUNDAMENT…TRINITY ACADEMY INCORPORATED: $7,000 · EducationTRINITY ACADEMY IN…+2 more: $2,000 · EducationTHE PANDO INITIATIVE INC: $37,400 · Human ServicesTHE PANDO IN…THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $34,000 · Human ServicesTHE WICHITA …THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311): $2,500 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $37,750 · Food & NutritionCompassion International Incorporated: $30,000 · InternationalUNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC: $19,500 · PhilanthropyAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,100 · Health
Other$280,458Arts & Culture$132,322Education$114,200Human Services$74,400Food & Nutrition$37,750International$30,000Philanthropy$19,500Health$10,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWichita Art Museum Inc: $52,800 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $51,700 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEXPLORATION PLACE INC: $46,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $37,750 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PANDO INITIATIVE INC: $37,400 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetGRACELAND UNIVERSITY: $37,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $34,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMARK ARTS INC: $28,272 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC: $19,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $16,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY ACADEMY INCORPORATED: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE: $3,550 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311): $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $1,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMUSIC THEATRE WICHITA: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTS PARTNERS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Wichita Art Museum Inc ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EXPLORATION PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PANDO INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds GRACELAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds MARK ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY ACADEMY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311) ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC THEATRE WICHITA ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds ARTS PARTNERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berry Foundation IncKS28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berry Foundation Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · DeVore Foundation Inc · Ima Foundation · Servant Foundation · K T Wiedemann Foundation Inc · The Fidelity Bank Foundation · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · The Walser Foundation · Lusk Foundation · Koch Family Foundation · Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dwayne and Dottie Shannon Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dwayne and Dottie Shannon Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dwayne and Dottie Shannon Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph