Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dw Gore Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.4MInternational$695kHealth$365kSocial Science$265kEmployment$145kScience & Tech$113kEnvironment$70kHuman Services$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $625k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$84k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GIVEWELL MAXIMUM IMPACT FUND$250,000
PENCILS OF PROMISE$100,000
WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION$75,000
BRAIN & BEHAVIOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION$50,000
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION$50,000
CLIMATE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING INITIATIVE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$50,000
BUILDING EXCELLENT SCHOOLS$50,000
YEAR UP$50,000
JUMPSTART$50,000
OUR WORLD IN DATA$50,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$50,000
MIT POVERTY ACTION LAB$50,000
CENTER FOR AI SAFETY$25,000
LEADING YOUTH THROUGH EMPOWERMENT$25,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR TRUSTEES AND ALUMNI$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GIRLS WHO CODE: $20k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE: $10k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE: $10k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
IL
NY
MA
CA
VA
MD
DE
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 28 repeat orgs$245k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
6

Total granted

$2.9M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+89%

Still filing today

46%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalSocial ScienceScience & TechPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CLEAR FUND
    4× · 2022–2025 · $470k · revenue +79%
  • WF
    WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +128%
  • NA
    NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $205k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • MC
    Mercatus Center Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -4%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • A
    ALLFED
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
2
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
3
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
4
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
5
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
6
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
7
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
9
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
10
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
11
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pencils of Promise Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Charter School of Wilmington Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION: $205,000 · OtherNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA A…MIT POVERTY ACTION LAB: $175,000 · OtherMIT POVERTY ACTION LABBROOKINGS: $150,000 · OtherBROOKINGSOUR WORLD IN DATA: $90,000 · OtherOUR WORLD IN DATAPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $80,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODFUTURE OF HUMANITY INSTITUTE AT OXFORD UNIVERSITY: $80,000 · OtherFUTURE OF HUMANITY INSTITUTE AT OXFORD UNIVERSITYYEAR UP: $70,000 · OtherHERTZ FOUNDATION: $70,000 · OtherCLIMATE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING INITIATIVE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $70,000 · OtherSOLAR GEO-ENGINEERING RESEARCH PROGRAM AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $60,000 · OtherGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $50,000 · Other+12 more: $268,000 · Other+12 moreWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $225,000 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INCBES INC: $165,000 · EducationBES INCYEAR UP INC: $145,000 · EducationYEAR UP INCJUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC: $135,000 · EducationJUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDR…LEADING YOUTH THROUGH EMPOWERMENT INC: $25,000 · EducationCHARTER SCHOOL OF WILMINGTON INC: $25,000 · Education+2 more: $10,000 · EducationTHE CLEAR FUND: $470,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEAR FUNDCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $145,000 · InternationalCAMFED USA…PENCILS OF PROMISE INCORPORATED: $100,000 · InternationalPENCILS OF…EVIDENCE ACTION: $50,000 · InternationalEVIDENCE A…AMERICAN COUNCIL OF TRUSTEES AND ALUMNI: $100,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: $80,000 · Social ScienceMercatus Center Inc: $10,000 · Social SciencePLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $80,000 · Health
Other$1,368,000Education$730,000Philanthropy$470,000International$295,000Arts & Culture$100,000Social Science$90,000Health$80,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $470,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $225,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION: $205,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBES INC: $165,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $145,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $145,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetJUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC: $135,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN COUNCIL OF TRUSTEES AND ALUMNI: $100,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $80,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: $80,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEVIDENCE ACTION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY: $28,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHARTER SCHOOL OF WILMINGTON INC: $25,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetMercatus Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF EXCEL ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALMA DEL MAR FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CLEAR FUND ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION ↗
  • Who funds BES INC ↗
  • Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMFED USA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COUNCIL OF TRUSTEES AND ALUMNI ↗
  • Who funds PENCILS OF PROMISE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds EVIDENCE ACTION ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS WHO CODE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LEADING YOUTH THROUGH EMPOWERMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARTER SCHOOL OF WILMINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds Center for AI Safety Inc ↗
  • Who funds Mercatus Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF EXCEL ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALMA DEL MAR FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dw Gore Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dw Gore Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Leading Youth Through Empowerment Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Charter School of Wilmington Inc: 2% of income from government
  • American Physical Society: 1% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dw Gore Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph