Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dw Frankel Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$293k
Granted FY2023
23
Grants FY2023
10
States reached
$50k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

53% of Dw Frankel Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 11 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Dw Frankel Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 12 organizations, $293k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
17
1
18
1
19
1
20
1
21
22
22
12
23
11
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$2.4MEducation$332kPhilanthropy$286kHealth$123kReligion$82kEnvironment$68kHuman Services$32kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kOther$0
02FY2023 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k10 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $214k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY$50,000
TELLURIDE MEDICAL CENTER$35,000
ST JUDE$30,000
RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI$25,000
TEMPLE BETH AM$18,275
APETURE FOUNDATION$15,000
AH HAA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS CO$10,300
DARTMOUTH COLLEGE$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$10,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$10,000
MOUNTAINFILM LTD$10,000
FISTULA FOUNDATION$10,000
MET MUSEUM$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 17% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $286k → 7%FISTULA FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%EL NIDO FAMILY CENTERS: $32k → 14%TEMPLE BETH AM: $18k → 6%RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL: $30k → 28%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $10k → 14%NSU ART MUSEUM: $50k → 13%ST JUDE: $30k → 17%BEST FRIENDS: $5k → 9%AH HAA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS CO: $519k → 7%FISTULA FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%PBS SOCAL: $10k → 14%TEMPLE BETH AM: $9k → 6%THE THACHER SCHOOL: $10k → 17%RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL: $30k → 28%NSU ART MUSEUM: $25k → 13%ST JUDE: $20k → 17%AH HAA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS CO: $486k → 7%FISTULA FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%PBS SOCAL: $5k → 14%TEMPLE BETH AM: $5k → 6%APETURE FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL: $30k → 28%AMERICAN RIVERS FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%NEW WORLD SYMPHONY: $26k → 15%AH HAA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS CO: $429k → 7%PBS SOCAL: $5k → 14%MET MUSEUM: $5k → 17%AMERICAN RIVERS FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%AH HAA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS CO: $421k → 7%APETURE FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%AH HAA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS CO: $328k → 7%MET MUSEUM: $5k → 17%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI: $90k → 15%TELLURIDE MEDICAL CENTER: $35k → 7%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI: $25k → 15%TELLURIDE MEDICAL CENTER: $30k → 7%AH HAA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS CO: $10k → 7%EARTH JUSTICE: $10k → 17%AH HAA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS CO: $10k → 7%MOUNTAINFILM LTD: $10k → 7%GUGGENHEIM MUSEUM: $6k → 17%MOUNTAINFILM LTD: $10k → 7%CANCER RESEARCH: $10k → 17%MOUNTAINFILM LTD: $10k → 7%AH HAA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS CO: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
IN
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
TN
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 22 repeat orgs$106k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
13

Total granted

$3.0M
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+19%

Still filing today

50%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentArts & CultureEducationHealthAnimalsInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Miami
    2× · 2022–2023 · $115k · revenue +29%
  • RC
    RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $90k · revenue +19%
  • The Fistula Foundation
    3× · 2022–2024 · $50k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • NW
    NEW WORLD SYMPHONY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $26k · revenue -54%
  • TT
    THE THACHER SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • GM
    GUGGENHEIM MUSEUM
    one grant, 2022 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
2
California Academy of Sciences

The academy is a renowned scientific and educational institution with a mission to regenerate the natural world through science, learning, and collaboration. based in san francisco's golden gate park, it is home to a world-class aquarium,…

Arts & Culture
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

4
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
5
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

8
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
9
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
10
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
11
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
12
American Academy of Arts & Sciences

Founded in 1780, the american academy of arts and sciences honors excellence and convenes leaders from every field of human endeavor to examine new ideas, address issues of importance to the nation and the world, and work together "to…

Social Science

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust and the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Independent K-8 SchoolsChristian Missionary Organi…Land Conservation Organizat…Classical Music EnsemblesAnimal Rescue and AdoptionGovernment Accountability R…Wildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Education Equity LeadershipVeteran Support ServicesCommunity Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr21%15%10–20yr17%22%20–35yr12%26%35–55yr13%37%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr21%2%10–20yr17%14%20–35yr12%80%35–55yr13%5%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
13%
4,367/33,387

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
19/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AH HAA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS — $2,213,382 · OtherAH HAA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTSFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · Other+24 more — $370,913 · Other+24 moreNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $285,533 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL …+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyUniversity of Miami — $115,000 · EducationRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC — $90,000 · EducationNEW WORLD SYMPHONY INC — $26,000 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth College — $16,800 · Education+1 more — $518 · EducationBISCAYNE BAY WATERKEEPER INC — $35,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $11,030 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICE — $10,040 · Environment+2 more — $1,440 · EnvironmentMOUNTAINFILM — $30,299 · Arts & CultureAPERTURE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Museum of Natural History — $3,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $1,220 · Arts & CultureThe Fistula Foundation — $50,000 · HealthAMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY INC — $3,075 · HealthWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $20,000 · International
Other$2,684,295Philanthropy$286,533Education$248,318Environment$57,510Arts & Culture$54,519Health$53,075International$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAH HAA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS — $2,213,382 over 8y, 23% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $285,533 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $115,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC — $90,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation — $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBISCAYNE BAY WATERKEEPER INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetEL NIDO FAMILY CENTERS — $31,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMOUNTAINFILM — $30,299 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNEW WORLD SYMPHONY INC — $26,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAPERTURE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College — $16,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $11,030 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE — $10,040 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Pinhead Institute — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTELLURIDE SCIENCE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY INC — $3,075 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND CHANCE HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLIP AND PATRICIA FROST MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH MIAMI INC — $518 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC — $440 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art — $220 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Harold Rubenstein Family Charitable FoundationDC15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Harold Rubenstein Family Charitable Foundation · Cobb Family Foundation Inc · Telluride Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Day Family Foundation · The Dalton Family Foundation · Ebb Point Foundation- Blackrock · The Mclaughlin Doty Foundation · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · The Miami Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dw Frankel Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Connecticut River Watershed Council Inc40% of income from government
  • Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc19% of income from government
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
  • Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc4% of income from government
  • Phillip and Patricia Frost Museum of Science Inc1% of income from government
  • New World Symphony Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dw Frankel Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dw Frankel Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph