· Private foundation
Day Family Foundation
Its FY2017 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TELLURIDE MOUNTAIN FILM LTD | $5,250 |
| TELLURIDE INSTITUTE INC | $4,000 |
| BLAIR ACADEMY | $3,000 |
| THE PINHEAD INSTITUTE INC | $3,000 |
| TELLURIDE REPERTORY THEATRE CO | $2,500 |
| SAN MIQUEL EDUCATIONAL FUND | $2,500 |
| RICO CENTER | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| KUTE INC | $2,000 |
| ROCKY MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE | $1,500 |
| FLINT INSTITUTE OF ART | $1,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE WILKINSON PUBLIC | $1,000 |
| AREI INC | $1,000 |
| SWALLOW HILL MUSIC ASSOCIATION | $1,000 |
| BLUE SAGE CENTER | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Advance the well- being of mountain people and conservation of mountain environments.
See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…
The organization pursues higher standards of news coverage of natural resources and the environment -- standards of accuracy, fairness, balance, depth and context.
The mission of the alliance for sustainable energy llc (alliance) is to operate the u.s. department of energy's national renewable energy laboratory to advance the science and engineering of energy efficiency, sustainable transportation,…
Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.
Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.
From its rocky mountain roots, creede repertory theatre serves as an artistic home to our rural community and beyond, through the creation of repertory seasons, dynamic educational programs, and compelling new works.
Greater yellowstone coalition works with all people to protect the lands, waters, and wildlife of the greater yellowstone ecosystem, now and for future generations.
The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.
The San Juan Citizens Alliance advocates for clean air, pure water, and healthy lands - the foundations of resilient communities, ecosystems and economies in the San Juan Basin.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Telluride Foundation and the most unlike its peers is National Ataxia Foundation Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE TELLURIDE INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds The Pinhead Institute ↗
- Who funds BLAIR ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds SAN MIGUEL EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds RICO CENTER ↗
- Who funds KUTE INC DBA KSUT PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Institute ↗
- Who funds Flint Institute of Arts ↗
- Who funds Needlerock Family Health Clinic ↗
- Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DZI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE PARADISE THEATER ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CEDAR MESA ↗
- Who funds THE HILL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds AH HAA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE TELLURIDE ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds SWALLOW HILL MUSIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HIGH COUNTRY NEWS ↗
- Who funds AREI INC ↗
- Who funds TELLURIDE SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY RADIO PROJECT INC KSJD ↗
- Who funds NORTH FORK VALLEY PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE SAGE CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds National Ataxia Foundation Incorporated ↗
- Who funds SHEEP MOUNTAIN ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP ↗
- Who funds COLORADO MUSIC HALL OF FAME ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Telluride Foundation · Community Foundation of the Gunnison Valley · El Pomar Foundation · The Dalton Family Foundation · The Thomas Phillips and Jane Moore Johnson Foundation · Nextfifty Initiative · Rose Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Valley Floor Preservation Partners · Dw Frankel Foundation Inc · Cornet Creek Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Day Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Blair Academy — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.