Skip to content

· Private foundation

Duroe Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$104k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$183kEducation$128kCommunity Improvement$120kHousing & Shelter$99kHuman Services$76kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kPublic Benefit$30kPhilanthropy$26kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $57k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Iowa Heartland Habitat for Humanity$25,000
Winnebago Council - Boy Scouts of America$12,000
Cedar Falls School Foundation$10,000
Community Foundation of NE Iowa$10,000
Waterloo Police Foundation$5,000
Silos & Smokestacks National Heritage Area$5,000
Boys & Girls Club of the Cedar Valley$5,000
Waverly Health Center Foundation$5,000
Leader Valley Foundation$5,000
Bosco Catholic School System$3,000
Des Moines Childrens Museum$3,000
Cedar Valley Hospice$3,000
The Cedar Valley Friends of the Family$2,500
Family & Children's Council of Black Hawk County$2,500
Jesup Dollars for Scholars$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Waverly Child Care and Preschool: $5k → 7%Exceptional Persons Inc: $22k → 17%Cedar Valley Hospice: $3k → 17%Love Inc of the Cedar Valley: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$639k · 22 repeat orgs$111k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
17

Total granted

$639k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+28%

Still filing today

55%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IH
    IOWA HEARTLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $55k · revenue +127%
  • CC
    CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
    4× · 2017–2022 · $52k · revenue +575%
  • LV
    LEADER VALLEY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $26k · revenue +134%

Funded once

  • EP
    EXCEPTIONAL PERSONS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $22k · revenue +20%
  • JF
    JOB FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue +21%
  • IH
    IA HEARTLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waterloo Community Foundation

Provide a lean, straightforward, and transparent conduit vehicle to those who wish to contribute resources for the betterment of the greater waterloo, iowa community and its citizens.

Philanthropy
2
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
3
Community Foundation for Western Iowa

The community foundation for western iowa is dedicated to creating a lasting legacy in our region by engaging our citizens and communities for durable change and fostering a culture of philanthropy. this is where giving grows.

Philanthropy
4
United Way of East Central Iowa

Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.

Philanthropy
5
West Central Community Action

In partnership with state and federal government, our mission is to administer programs designed to help residents in our 10-county region of southwest iowa achieve self-sufficiency.

Human Services
6
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
7
Waterbury Development Corporation

To stimulate and support economic and housing development within the communities of the city of waterbury.

Community Improvement
8
Webster City Day Care

Child day care center

—
9
United Way of Clinton County Iowa

To provide leadership in our communities to 1) identify our most pressing human care needs, 2) to work together to direct the time, energy and resources towards addressing those needs to improve our quality of life.

—
10
The Foundation for the Iowa City Community School District

The foundation for the iowa city community school district connects the community with our schools to ensure every student has extraordinary learning experiences. together we empower teachers and district staff and inspire students to…

—
11
Children's Cancer Connection

Connecting families affected by childhood cancer by providing opportunities that encourage relationships and strengthen community.

—
12
Iowa City Area Chamber of Commerce

Our mission is to inspire the iowa city area to be greater by: 1) elevating business, 2) investing in strategic initiatives, and 3) advocating for the economic resiliency of the greater community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Iowa Center for Economic Success; the most unlike its peers is One City United. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
22/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WINNEBAGO COUNCIL - BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $111,500 · OtherWINNEBAGO COUNCIL - BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAUNI Foundation: $74,050 · OtherUNI FoundationBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CEDAR VALLEY: $65,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CEDAR VALLEYCITY OF JESUP: $60,000 · OtherCITY OF JESUPChristian CommunityHouse of Hope: $60,000 · OtherChristian CommunityHouse of HopeCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $51,862 · OtherCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT+26 more: $131,183 · Other+26 moreWARTBURG COLLEGE: $25,000 · EducationWARTBURG C…WATERLOO COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $19,000 · EducationWATERLOO C…JOB FOUNDATION: $11,300 · EducationJOB FOUNDA…CEDAR FALLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationCEDAR FALL…HAWKEYE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDN: $5,000 · EducationHAWKEYE CO…IOWA HEARTLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $55,000 · Housing & ShelterEXCEPTIONAL PERSONS INC: $21,500 · Human ServicesWAVERLY CHILD CARE & PRESCHOOL: $5,000 · Human ServicesCEDAR VALLEY HOSPICE INC: $3,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesLEADER VALLEY FOUNDATION: $26,000 · Community ImprovementIOWA CENTER FOR ECONOMIC SUCCESS: $1,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF WATERLOO - CEDAR FALLS IOWA INC: $1,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST IOWA: $20,000 · PhilanthropyCEDAR VALLEY UNITED WAY: $6,000 · PhilanthropyWEST DES MOINES COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropySILOS & SMOKESTACKS NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA INC: $15,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$553,595Education$70,300Housing & Shelter$55,000Human Services$30,500Community Improvement$28,000Philanthropy$27,000Recreation & Sports$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIOWA HEARTLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $55,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $51,862 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetLEADER VALLEY FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetWARTBURG COLLEGE: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL PERSONS INC: $21,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST IOWA: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWATERLOO COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetSILOS & SMOKESTACKS NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetJOB FOUNDATION: $11,300 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetWAVERLY AREA VETERANS POST: $10,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCEDAR FALLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWAVERLY HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCEDAR VALLEY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGROW CEDAR VALLEY: $8,333 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY & CHILDREN'S COUNCIL OF BLACK HAWK COUNTY: $7,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMEALS FROM THE HEARTLAND INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCEDAR VALLEY UNITED WAY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHAWKEYE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWAVERLY CHILD CARE & PRESCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CEDAR VALLEY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONE CITY UNITED: $3,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCEDAR VALLEY HOSPICE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDES MOINES CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetIOWA CENTER FOR ECONOMIC SUCCESS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST DES MOINES COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGROUT MUSEUM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLANK PARK ZOO FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE INC OF THE CEDAR VALLEY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF WATERLOO - CEDAR FALLS IOWA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetDENTAL CONNECTIONS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IOWA HEARTLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds LEADER VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WARTBURG COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds EXCEPTIONAL PERSONS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST IOWA ↗
  • Who funds WATERLOO COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SILOS & SMOKESTACKS NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA INC ↗
  • Who funds JOB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WAVERLY AREA VETERANS POST ↗
  • Who funds CEDAR FALLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WAVERLY HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CEDAR VALLEY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds GROW CEDAR VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN'S COUNCIL OF BLACK HAWK COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MEALS FROM THE HEARTLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds CEDAR VALLEY UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds HAWKEYE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDN ↗
  • Who funds WAVERLY CHILD CARE & PRESCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CEDAR VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds ONE CITY UNITED ↗
  • Who funds CEDAR VALLEY HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds DES MOINES CHILDRENS MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lsb FoundationIA49× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lsb Foundation · Max and Helen Guernsey Charitable Foundation · Otto Schoitz Foundation · Black Hawk County Gaming Association · GreenState Credit Union · Cedar Valley United Way · Veridian Credit Union · The Gallagher Family Foundation · Dupaco RW Hoefer Foundation · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Trustage Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Duroe Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Duroe Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Duroe Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph