Skip to content

· Public charity

Durham-Chapel Hill Jewish Federation

We provide engaging opportunities that deepen jewish connections, knowledge and relations to israel; services for helping those in need; programs that foster healthy living; and pathways for chartiable giving.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$188k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.7MEducation$229kHealth$98kEnvironment$57kArts & Culture$50kPublic Benefit$25kCrime & Legal$20kInternational$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $390,314, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,150,926 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $760,612 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $109k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $253k
$13,174
Median grant
2
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETH EL SYNAGOGUE$187,795
KEHILLAH SYNAGOGUE$65,286
UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION$35,000
JUDEA REFORM CONGREGATION$33,676
FRIENDS OF THE ARAVA INSTITUTE$15,000
NC HILLEL FOUNDATION$13,174
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC$11,933
TRIANGLE JEWISH CHORALE$9,000
DURHAM LITERACY CENTER FOUNDATION$6,950
TRIANGLE LAND CONSERVANCY$6,500
URBAN MINISTRIES OF DURHAM$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FRIENDS OF THE ARAVA INSTITUTE: $17k → 8%AT THE WELL CO MOISHE HOUSE: $28k → 11%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC: $12k → 8%DUKE UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR JEWISH STUDIES: $16k → 11%ELON UNIVERSITY: $11k → 13%KEHILLAH SYNAGOGUE: $80k → 13%GREENSBORO JEWISH FEDERATION: $10k → 16%TALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF BALTIMORE: $40k → 11%FRIENDS OF THE ARAVA INSTITUTE: $15k → 8%AT THE WELL CO MOISHE HOUSE: $10k → 11%THE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $10k → 17%ELON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 13%KEHILLAH SYNAGOGUE: $75k → 13%FRIENDS OF THE ARAVA INSTITUTE: $13k → 8%JEWISH CREATIVITY INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 17%BETH EL SYNAGOGUE: $213k → 11%ELON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 13%KEHILLAH SYNAGOGUE: $65k → 13%BETH EL SYNAGOGUE: $193k → 11%KEHILLAH SYNAGOGUE: $57k → 13%BETH EL SYNAGOGUE: $188k → 11%KEHILLAH SYNAGOGUE: $46k → 13%BETH EL SYNAGOGUE: $172k → 11%KEHILLAH SYNAGOGUE: $35k → 13%BETH EL SYNAGOGUE: $131k → 11%ARTS CENTER: $25k → 13%BETH EL SYNAGOGUE: $96k → 11%UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION: $35k → 13%BETH EL SYNAGOGUE: $60k → 11%UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION: $30k → 13%BETH EL SYNAGOGUE: $14k → 11%NC HILLEL FOUNDATION: $22k → 13%NC HILLEL FOUNDATION: $18k → 13%NC HILLEL FOUNDATION: $15k → 13%NC HILLEL FOUNDATION: $13k → 13%NC HILLEL FOUNDATION: $12k → 13%LERNER JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL: $66k → 11%NC HILLEL FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%LERNER JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $42k → 11%NC HILLEL FOUNDATION: $9k → 13%JUDEA REFORM CONGREGATION: $34k → 11%JUDEA REFORM CONGREGATION: $27k → 11%JUDEA REFORM CONGREGATION: $22k → 11%JUDEA REFORM CONGREGATION: $21k → 11%JUDEA REFORM CONGREGATION: $19k → 11%JUDEA REFORM CONGREGATION: $17k → 11%LERNER JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL: $14k → 11%JUDEA REFORM CONGREGATION: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 13 repeat orgs$271k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +0% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
19

Total granted

$2.0M
$262k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
0%

Still filing today

85%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalEnvironmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LERNER JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL
    5× · 2017–2022 · $135k · revenue +14%
  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA HILLEL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $107k · revenue +100%
  • UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2021–2025 · $65k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $46k
  • TA
    TALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF BALTIMORE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • IMAGINE NORTH CAROLINA FIRST
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Durham-Chapel Hill Jewish Federation

We provide engaging opportunities that deepen jewish connections, knowledge and relations to israel; services for helping those in need; programs that foster healthy living; and pathways for chartiable giving.

—
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Irvine Hebrew Day School

Ihds utilizes a dual general and judaic studies curriculum. the judaic studies curriculum emphasizes the fundamentals of hebrew reading, writing and speaking, jewish history, holidays, jewish values, torah, the jewish life cycle, the land…

—
4
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
5
Davidson Day School

Davidson Day is a Pre-K through 12th grade college preparatory school located in Davidson, North Carolina. Davidson Day School fosters academic excellence through collaboration, creativity, and character development. Our vision is to be a…

Education
6
North Carolina Museum of Life & Science Inc

To create a place of lifelong learning where people, from young child to senior citizen, embrace science as a way of knowing about themselves, their community, and their world.

Arts & Culture
7
Student U

Our mission is to empower and equip first-generation college students in durham public schools, their families, and educators to become the leaders that will transform our city.

Education
8
Abraham Joshua Heschel School

The abraham joshua heschel school is an independent jewish day school which includes students from a wide range of jewish backgrounds, practices and beliefs. (see schedule o for continuation)

Education
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
The Montessori School of Raleigh Inc

The montessori school of raleigh (msr) and carolina preparatory academy (carolina prep) are the triangle's modern embodiment and mindful practice of the time-proven montessori philosophy and the world-renowned international baccalaureate…

Education
11
Atlanta Jewish Academy Inc

Atlanta jewish academy is a college preparatory, co-educational, preschool-12th grade, independent jewish day school, guided by modern orthodox values and principles. we embody the ideals of community, tradition, individual development and…

Education
12
Ben and Esther Rosenbloom Hillel Center for Jewish Life At University of Md

Enhance the lives of jewish students as that they may enrich the jewish people and the world. hillel actively seeks to engage jewish students on their own terms, to provide them with opportunities to participate in jewish life.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Carolina Hillel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Community Success Initiative Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
12/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Beth El Preschool: $1,066,340 · EducationBeth El PreschoolUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $64,500 · Education+5 more: $94,216 · Education+5 moreTHE CHAPEL HILL KEHILLAH: $313,090 · OtherTHE CHAPEL HILL KEHILLAHJUDEA REFORM CONGREGATION: $156,683 · OtherJUDEA REFORM CONGREGATIONTHE LERNER JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL: $134,632 · OtherTHE LERNER JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOLNORTH CAROLINA HILLEL FOUNDATION: $107,003 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA HILLEL FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $46,365 · OtherTALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF BALTIMORE INC: $40,000 · Other+13 more: $123,753 · Other+13 moreFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD: $44,300 · EnvironmentTRIANGLE LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $13,000 · EnvironmentMOISHE HOUSE: $37,900 · ReligionIMAGINE NORTH CAROLINA FIRST: $25,000 · Social ScienceARTS CENTER: $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $10,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $7,260 · InternationalHAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA: $6,000 · International
Education$1,225,056Other$921,526Environment$57,300Religion$37,900Social Science$25,000Arts & Culture$25,000International$23,260

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBeth El Preschool: $1,066,340 over 8y, 54% of budgetTHE LERNER JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL: $134,632 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA HILLEL FOUNDATION: $107,003 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $64,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD: $44,300 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMOISHE HOUSE: $37,900 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetElon University: $37,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDURHAM LITERACY CENTER INC: $26,900 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetIMAGINE NORTH CAROLINA FIRST: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARTS CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC: $20,533 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Success Initiative Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $15,616 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIANGLE LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUrban Ministries of Durham Inc: $12,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREENSBORO JEWISH FEDERATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $8,700 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $7,260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE Skills Foundation: $6,900 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDUKE SCHOOL: $6,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Durham Inc: $5,100 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Foundation IncNC29.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Duke University Health System Inc · The Leon Levine Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · Duke University · Duke Energy Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · Durham Merchants Association Charitable Foundation · The Forest At Duke Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Durham-Chapel Hill Jewish Federation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Durham-Chapel Hill Jewish Federation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Durham-Chapel Hill Jewish Federation’s filings →

More from the funding graph