Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dunn Foundation co Cynthia Behrens

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$12kHuman Services$11kAnimals$10kInternational$10kHealth$6kCrime & Legal$2kPhilanthropy$2kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,250
Median grant
4
States reached
$399k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Tunnels to Towers Foundation$1,500
Wounded Warriors$1,500
Animal Hope Inc$1,250
Texas Coalition for Animal Protecti$1,250
Fort Worth Abandoned Animal Allianc$1,250
Operation Kindness$1,250
BOSIA$1,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Childrens Aid Society: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
NY
PA
CA
CO
VA
TN
HI
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$38k · 9 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
11

Total granted

$38k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+6%

Still filing today

33%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationHealthInternationalHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE
    5× · 2017–2023 · $9k · revenue -39%
  • WW
    Wounded Warriors
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2021–2023 · $5k

Funded once

  • MU
    Manhattan University
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +2%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +99%
  • CL
    COLUMBIA LEGAL SERVICES
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue -78%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
3
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
6
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
7
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
8
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
10
Los Angeles Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Spcala is dedicated to the prevention of cruelty to animals through education, law enforcement, intervention and advocacy.

Animals
11
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Children's Aid Society of Alabama. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Wounded Warriors: $7,500 · OtherWounded WarriorsIndividual grant recipient: $4,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientShriners Hospitals: $3,000 · OtherShriners HospitalsIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFort Worth Abandoned Animal Allianc: $2,250 · OtherFort Worth Abandoned Animal AlliancIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOcean Clean-Up: $1,500 · OtherBainbridge Ometepe Sister Island As: $1,300 · OtherTexas Coalition for Animal Protecti: $1,250 · OtherBOSIA: $1,200 · Other+4 more: $3,300 · Other+4 moreManhattan University: $6,570 · EducationManhattan Universi…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,800 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUN…CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE: $8,550 · InternationalCENTRAL ASIA IN…HOPE FOR PAWS: $4,000 · AnimalsHOPE FOR PA…ANIMAL HOPE INC: $1,250 · AnimalsANIMAL HOPE…OPERATION KINDNESS: $1,250 · AnimalsOPERATION K…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,500 · HealthSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1,500 · HealthCOLUMBIA LEGAL SERVICES: $1,500 · Crime & LegalSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $1,500 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY OF ALABAMA: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$30,300Education$10,370International$8,550Animals$6,500Health$3,000Crime & Legal$1,500Philanthropy$1,500Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE: $8,550 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetManhattan University: $6,570 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR PAWS: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA LEGAL SERVICES: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL HOPE INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOPERATION KINDNESS: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY OF ALABAMA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Manhattan University ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOR PAWS ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION KINDNESS ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY OF ALABAMA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dunn Foundation co Cynthia Behrens funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dunn Foundation co Cynthia Behrens. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dunn Foundation co Cynthia Behrens?

    Find your warmest path to Dunn Foundation co Cynthia Behrens through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dunn Foundation co Cynthia Behrens’ filings →

    More from the funding graph