Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dunietz Minsk Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$180k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$613kHuman Services$388kReligion$256kArts & Culture$40kInternational$30k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $119k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$25,068
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY$51,111
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$48,839
HERZL-NER TAMID CONSERVATIVE CONGREGATION$34,627
TEMPLE DE HIRSCH SINAI$25,068
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SEATTLE$10,472
HOLOCAUST CENTER FOR HUMANITY$5,170
HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $347k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $49k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $46k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $46k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $41k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $40k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $39k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $38k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $8k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $8k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $8k → 9%HOPELINK: $10k → 9%HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $5k → 9%HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $5k → 9%HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 8 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +74% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$1.2M
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
-4%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $322k · revenue +107%
  • HC
    Holocaust Center For Humanity
    8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +174%
  • H
    HOPELINK
    4× · 2017–2020 · $40k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • KG
    Kline Galland Centergraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue +58%
  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -9%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Mothers of Metropolitan Seattle
Religion
2
Joint Israel

To help build a more just society by creating model programs for disadvantaged populations. The activities focus primarily on helping Israel overcome the challenges facing five groups (cont. on sched O):

International
3
Jewish Federation of Greater Portland

To assure the building and strengthening of the jewish community locally, nationally, overseas and in israel, in accordance with jewish values.

Philanthropy
4
Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago

Juf provides critical resources that bring food, refuge, health care, education and emergency assistance to over 500,000 chicagoans of all faiths and millions of jews in israel and around the world, funding a network of 100+ agencies,…

Philanthropy
5
Hebrew Free Loan Association of Dc

The Hebrew Free Loan Association of Greater Washington, guided by Jewish values, provides individuals and families with interest-free loans to help them overcome financial challenges or to embrace professional and personal opportunities…

Public Benefit
6
The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington Inc

The jewish federation of greater washington (federation) envisions a connected and vibrant jewish community that cares for each other, fosters jewish learning and journeys, embraces jewish peoplehood and israel, and acts as a force for…

Philanthropy
7
The Jerusalem Connection
8
Mazon a Jewish Response to Hunger

Inspired by Jewish values and ideals, MAZON is a national advocacy organization working to end hunger among people of all faiths and backgrounds in the United States and Israel. See Schedule O for more details.

9
Jewish Coalition for Immigrant Justice Northwest

The jewish coalition builds a jewish voice in the pacific northwest advancing immigrant justice and domestic policy, following the leadership of impacted community.

Human Services
10
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

Federation amplifies our collective strength to make the world a better place for everyone. we assist people in need, impact chicagoans of all faiths; support israel and the jewish people worldwide; respond swiftly to crises; cultivate…

Philanthropy
11
Hillel Foundation for Jewish Life at the University of Washington

The mission of Hillel at the University of Washington (Hillel UW) is to inspire students and young adults (ages 18-35) to explore, embrace, and celebrate Jewish life and identity.

12
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hopelink and the most unlike its peers is Americares Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY — $504,599 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTYJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SEATTLE — $87,972 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SEATTLESEATTLE FOUNDATION — $20,864 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $322,199 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICEHOPELINK — $40,000 · Human ServicesHOPELINKHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON STATE — $15,000 · Human ServicesHEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGION — $134,282 · OtherHEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWI…TEMPLE DE HIRSCH SINAI — $86,726 · OtherTEMPLE DE HIRSCH SINAIHolocaust Center For Humanity — $40,170 · OtherHolocaust Center For Huma…HERZL-NER TAMID CONSERVATIVE CONGREGATION — $34,627 · OtherHERZL-NER TAMID CONSERVAT…AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $10,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $10,000 · InternationalKline Galland Center — $10,544 · Health
Philanthropy$613,435Human Services$377,199Other$295,805International$30,000Health$10,544

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY — $504,599 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $322,199 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SEATTLE — $87,972 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHolocaust Center For Humanity — $40,170 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetHOPELINK — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION — $20,864 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON STATE — $15,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetKline Galland Center — $10,544 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SEATTLE
  • Who funds Holocaust Center For Humanity
  • Who funds HOPELINK
  • Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON STATE
  • Who funds Kline Galland Center
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Samis FoundationWA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Samis Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle · Seattle Foundation · Howard and Frances Keller Family Foundation · Tillie & Alfred Shemanski Testamentary Trust · Loeb Charitable Foundation · Lott Foundation · United Way of King County · Fjc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dunietz Minsk Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dunietz Minsk Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dunietz Minsk Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph