Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dungan Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$992k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.0MArts & Culture$81kAnimals$42kHealth$38kFood & Nutrition$35kHuman Services$30kEducation$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $250k+1 grant · $992k
$991,618
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST - DUNGAN FAMILY CHARIT FUND - BMO DAF PROGRAM$991,618
CLUB LIFE CHARITIES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 17% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST - DUNGAN FAMILY CHARIT FUND - BMO DAF PROGRAM: $992k → 7%HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNATION: $15k → 10%ALOHA ANIMAL OASIS: $10k → 15%CLUB LIFE CHARITIES: $10k → 14%GRACEES ACRES: $1k → 15%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF FORT WAYNE: $10k → 12%FERAL FIXERS: $9k → 7%KAMINS FARM SANCTUARY: $10k → 8%METROPOLIS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $23k → 14%ABAY KITTIES: $1k → 15%CLUB LIFE CHARITIES: $10k → 14%FERAL FIXERS: $9k → 7%KAMINS FARM SANCTUARY: $6k → 8%METROPOLIS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $10k → 14%FERAL FIXERS: $5k → 7%KAMINS FARM: $5k → 8%METROPOLIS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $10k → 14%KAMINS FARM SANCTUARY: $5k → 8%NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%METROPOLIS: $10k → 14%METROPOLIS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $10k → 14%METROPOLIS PERF ARTS CENTER: $10k → 14%THE BUDDY FOUNDATION: $9k → 14%NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%GERRYS CAFE: $9k → 14%ARLINGTON HEIGHTS MEMORIAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%GERRYS CAFE: $1k → 14%ARLINGTON HEIGHTS MEMORIAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%CHICAGO WEST COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER: $5k → 14%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $15k → 14%CHICAGO WEST COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER: $1k → 14%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

14%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$172k · 8 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$172k
$103k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+23%

Still filing today

63%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $992k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsArts & CultureFood & NutritionHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    Performing Arts at Metropolis
    3× · 2017–2019 · $53k · revenue +23%
  • NC
    Northwest Community Hospital Foundation
    3× · 2017–2021 · $23k · revenue +371%
  • KF
    KAMINS FARM SANCTUARY
    3× · 2019–2022 · $21k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +17%
  • HH
    HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +49%
  • MP
    METROPOLIS PERF ARTS CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Humane Society Veterinary Centers Pc

Provide wellness and spay/neuter services at reduced cost for people in need.

Community Improvement
2
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
3
Illinois Animal Welfare Networkers Association
Animals
4
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
5
Naperville Area Humane Society

To provide animal shelter & adoption services throughout the naperville area. provide animal welfare education through the shelter and local school districts.

Animals
6
The Anti-Cruelty Society

Anti-Cruelty is a private, nonprofit organization which was established in 1899 and is chartered in Illinois. Anti-Cruelty builds a healthy and happy community where pets and people thrive together.

Animals
7
Felines Inc

Providing a safe and loving shelter to cats and dogs until their permanent adoptive home is found.

Animals
8
Chicago Cat Rescue

Chicago Cat Rescue is a not-for-profit licensed animal rescue organization The organization provides shelter food and medical care for homeless cats and kittens All donations raised and expenses incurred are used expressly for these…

Animals
9
Hinsdale Humane Society

To prevent animal suffering and neglect throughout our community and beyond, and to ensure that all animals in shelters and homes are well cared for and treated with compassion.

Animals
10
Arizona Humane Society

We save the most vulnerable animals and enrich the lives of pets and people.

Animals
11
The Animal Haven Inc

The animal haven's misson is to provide a temporary, safe, caring and humane refuge for homeless dogs and cats and place these animals in quality adoptive homes.

Animals
12
Chicago Rescue Authority

All-breed dog rescue -- We rescue, provide vital care, and adopt out dogs in the Chicagoland area. We also place an emphasis on educating the public about responsible pet ownership and ways to help lessen the pet overpopulation problem…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hoag Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Aloha Animal Oasis Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST - DUNGAN FAMILY CHARIT FUND - BMO DAF PROGRAM: $991,618 · OtherNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST - DUNGAN FAMILY CHARIT FUND - BMO DAF PROGRAM+11 more: $124,900 · Other+11 morePerforming Arts at Metropolis: $52,600 · Arts & CultureChicago West Community Music Center: $6,000 · Arts & CultureKAMINS FARM SANCTUARY: $21,000 · AnimalsALOHA ANIMAL OASIS CORP: $10,000 · AnimalsTHE BUDDY FOUNDATION: $9,000 · AnimalsGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $29,934 · Food & NutritionHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 · HealthARLINGTON HTS MEM LIBRARY FDTN: $6,000 · Education
Other$1,116,518Arts & Culture$58,600Animals$40,000Food & Nutrition$29,934Health$15,000Education$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPerforming Arts at Metropolis: $52,600 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $29,934 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwest Community Hospital Foundation: $22,900 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetKAMINS FARM SANCTUARY: $21,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALOHA ANIMAL OASIS CORP: $10,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetTHE BUDDY FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetChicago West Community Music Center: $6,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetARLINGTON HTS MEM LIBRARY FDTN: $6,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Performing Arts at Metropolis ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds Northwest Community Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds KAMINS FARM SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALOHA ANIMAL OASIS CORP ↗
  • Who funds THE BUDDY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Chicago West Community Music Center ↗
  • Who funds ARLINGTON HTS MEM LIBRARY FDTN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL12.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dungan Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dungan Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dungan Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph