Skip to content
Duim Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Duim Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$322k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$478kHousing & Shelter$397kHuman Services$307kInternational$203kEducation$95kReligion$76kRecreation & Sports$53kCivil Rights$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $86k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $229k
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Christian Radio for Russia$75,000
Acres of Diamonds$52,700
Vision House$51,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Pine Lake Covenant Mission$40,000
International Justice Mission$15,000
Adventure Soccer$11,000
Bridge Receiving Center$10,000
Mercy Walk$10,000
Seattle Pacific University$5,000
Care Net$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $112k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Everett Gospel Mission: $1k → 9%Vision House: $51k → 9%Vine Maple Place: $20k → 9%Vine Maple Place: $5k → 9%Bridge Receiving Center: $10k → 9%Bridge Receiving Center: $10k → 9%Bridge Receiving Center: $5k → 9%Bridge Receiving Center: $5k → 9%Bridge Receiving Center: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 12 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$1.5M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+5%

Still filing today

75%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHealthRecreation & SportsReligionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    Acres of Diamonds
    7× · 2019–2025 · $321k · revenue +92%
  • OC
    OLIVE CREST
    6× · 2019–2024 · $255k · revenue +71%
  • IJ
    INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $105k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -5%
  • WO
    Women of Vision
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • HI
    HAND IN HAND
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -105%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bread of Life Mission

Bringing hope, healing, and recovery to seattle's homeless through a christ-centered approach.

Human Services
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
3
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
4
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
5
Exodus Housing

To serve diverse households fleeing domestic violence with equitable, client-centered services that are inclusive, foster long-term self-sufficiency and promote access to permanent housing and community resources.hope - through compassion…

Housing & Shelter
6
Miracle Hill Ministries Inc

Miracle hill ministries is committed to life transformation for children and adults experiencing homelessness. more information and program outcomes may be found at www.miraclehill.org.

Human Services
7
Habitat for Humanity of Northwest Metro Atlanta Inc

Habitat for humanity of northwest metro atlanta, inc. is an affiliate of the americus-based habitat for humanity international. habitat for humanity of northwest metro atlanta, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry dedicated to…

—
8
New Road Missions

We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.

Religion
9
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
10
Samaritan House Inc

Samaritan House is committed to fostering personal safety, growth, and self-sufficiency in adults and their children through freedom from domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking and removing their risks of homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
11
The Orphans Hands Inc

The Orphan's Hands provides a safe home and education for orphaned youth at risk of being trafficked in high-risk countries while bringing the love and hope of Jesus.

International
12
Bridge of Hope Ministries

Transforming lives in the Ville through access to supportive services and efficacy.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest; the most unlike its peers is Bridge Receiving Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Christian Radio for Russia: $477,500 · OtherChristian Radio for RussiaPine Lake Covenant Mission: $75,000 · OtherPine Lake Covenant MissionIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+5 more: $26,500 · OtherAcres of Diamonds: $320,700 · HealthAcres of DiamondsOLIVE CREST: $254,700 · HealthOLIVE CRESTINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $105,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL…WORLD VISION INC: $60,500 · InternationalWORLD VISION …MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 · InternationalMEDICAL TEAMS…+1 more: $2,000 · InternationalVISION HOUSE: $51,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER: $35,000 · Human ServicesVINE MAPLE PLACE: $25,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesADVENTURE SOCCER: $52,500 · Recreation & SportsSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · EducationALASKA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE: $15,000 · ReligionCare Net: $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$689,000Health$575,400International$192,500Human Services$112,000Recreation & Sports$52,500Education$30,000Religion$15,000Civil Rights$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAcres of Diamonds: $320,700 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetOLIVE CREST: $254,700 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $105,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $60,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetADVENTURE SOCCER: $52,500 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetBRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER: $35,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVINE MAPLE PLACE: $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALASKA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCare Net: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAND IN HAND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHAITI FOUNDATION OF HOPE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEVERETT GOSPEL MISSION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Acres of Diamonds ↗
  • Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVENTURE SOCCER ↗
  • Who funds VISION HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds VINE MAPLE PLACE ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds ALASKA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Care Net ↗
  • Who funds HAND IN HAND ↗
  • Who funds HAITI FOUNDATION OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds EVERETT GOSPEL MISSION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy Fo…M J Murdock Charitabl…Charis FundThe Blackbaud Giving …The Albertsons Compan…Natl Christian Charit…Renton Regional Commu…Community Foundation …Windermere FoundationEdward Jones Foundati…Medina FoundationLucky Seven Foundation
Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Charis Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Renton Regional Community Fndn · Community Foundation of Snohomish County · Windermere Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Medina Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Duim Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Duim Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Medical Teams International: 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Duim Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home