Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Duim Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$322k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Public Safety & Disaster$478kHousing & Shelter$397kHuman Services$307kInternational$203kEducation$95kReligion$76kRecreation & Sports$53kCivil Rights$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $86k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $229k
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Christian Radio for Russia$75,000
Acres of Diamonds$52,700
Vision House$51,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Pine Lake Covenant Mission$40,000
International Justice Mission$15,000
Adventure Soccer$11,000
Bridge Receiving Center$10,000
Mercy Walk$10,000
Seattle Pacific University$5,000
Care Net$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $112k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Everett Gospel Mission: $1k → 9%Vision House: $51k → 9%Vine Maple Place: $20k → 9%Vine Maple Place: $5k → 9%Bridge Receiving Center: $10k → 9%Bridge Receiving Center: $10k → 9%Bridge Receiving Center: $5k → 9%Bridge Receiving Center: $5k → 9%Bridge Receiving Center: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 12 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$1.5M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+5%

Still filing today

75%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHealthRecreation & SportsReligionCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    Acres of Diamonds
    7× · 2019–2025 · $321k · revenue +92%
  • OC
    OLIVE CREST
    6× · 2019–2024 · $255k · revenue +71%
  • IJ
    INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $105k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -5%
  • WO
    Women of Vision
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • HI
    HAND IN HAND
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -105%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bread of Life Mission

Bringing hope, healing, and recovery to seattle's homeless through a christ-centered approach.

Human Services
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

3
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

4
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
5
Exodus Housing

To serve diverse households fleeing domestic violence with equitable, client-centered services that are inclusive, foster long-term self-sufficiency and promote access to permanent housing and community resources.hope - through compassion…

Housing & Shelter
6
Miracle Hill Ministries Inc

Miracle hill ministries is committed to life transformation for children and adults experiencing homelessness. more information and program outcomes may be found at www.miraclehill.org.

Human Services
7
Habitat for Humanity of Northwest Metro Atlanta Inc

Habitat for humanity of northwest metro atlanta, inc. is an affiliate of the americus-based habitat for humanity international. habitat for humanity of northwest metro atlanta, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry dedicated to…

8
New Road Missions

We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.

Religion
9
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
10
Samaritan House Inc

Samaritan House is committed to fostering personal safety, growth, and self-sufficiency in adults and their children through freedom from domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking and removing their risks of homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
11
The Orphans Hands Inc

The Orphan's Hands provides a safe home and education for orphaned youth at risk of being trafficked in high-risk countries while bringing the love and hope of Jesus.

International
12
Bridge of Hope Ministries

Transforming lives in the Ville through access to supportive services and efficacy.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest and the most unlike its peers is Bridge Receiving Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Christian Radio for Russia — $477,500 · OtherChristian Radio for RussiaPine Lake Covenant Mission — $75,000 · OtherPine Lake Covenant MissionIndividual grant recipient — $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+5 more — $26,500 · OtherAcres of Diamonds — $320,700 · HealthAcres of DiamondsOLIVE CREST — $254,700 · HealthOLIVE CRESTINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION — $105,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL…WORLD VISION INC — $60,500 · InternationalWORLD VISION …MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL — $25,000 · InternationalMEDICAL TEAMS…+1 more — $2,000 · InternationalVISION HOUSE — $51,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER — $35,000 · Human ServicesVINE MAPLE PLACE — $25,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesADVENTURE SOCCER — $52,500 · Recreation & SportsSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $30,000 · EducationALASKA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE — $15,000 · ReligionCare Net — $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$689,000Health$575,400International$192,500Human Services$112,000Recreation & Sports$52,500Education$30,000Religion$15,000Civil Rights$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAcres of Diamonds — $320,700 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetOLIVE CREST — $254,700 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION — $105,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $60,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetADVENTURE SOCCER — $52,500 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetBRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER — $35,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVINE MAPLE PLACE — $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALASKA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHAND IN HAND — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCare Net — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAITI FOUNDATION OF HOPE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEVERETT GOSPEL MISSION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Acres of Diamonds
  • Who funds OLIVE CREST
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC
  • Who funds ADVENTURE SOCCER
  • Who funds VISION HOUSE
  • Who funds BRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER
  • Who funds SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds VINE MAPLE PLACE
  • Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds ALASKA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE
  • Who funds HAND IN HAND
  • Who funds Care Net
  • Who funds HAITI FOUNDATION OF HOPE
  • Who funds EVERETT GOSPEL MISSION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Charis Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Renton Regional Community Fndn · Community Foundation of Snohomish County · Windermere Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Medina Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Duim Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 14%
  • Medical Teams International14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph