Skip to content

· Private foundation

Duck Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0169% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$33kHuman Services$8kEducation$6kHealth$5kHousing & Shelter$2kYouth Development$2kInternational$2kCrime & Legal$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$750
Median grant
1
States reached
$337k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS$1,517
WIB WIB FOUNDATION$1,500
HOUSE OF REFUGE BURKE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
THE LIGHTHOUSE FOR BOYS$850
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$750
Individual grant recipient$750
GLEN ALPINE MIDDLE SCHOOL$750
LMC LINVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$750
BURKE OSYCHOSOCIAL SERVICES$500
TABLE ROCK MIDDLE SCHOOL$500
JENNIFER MOORE BLOOD DRIVE$500
HOSKINS PARK MINISTRIES$500
TELL INSTITUTE$450
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Adoption Support Alliancec: $500 → 10%ADOPTION SUPPORT ALLIANCE: $500 → 10%ADOPTION SUPPORT ALLIANCE: $500 → 10%CRISIS ASSITANCE MINISTRY: $250 → 10%CRISIS ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $150 → 10%OUTREACH CENTER: $600 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$55k · 22 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
34

Total granted

$55k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+39%

Still filing today

23%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalArts & CultureHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BU
    BURKE UNITED CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES
    2× · 2017–2023 · $2k · revenue +786%
  • AS
    ADOPTION SUPPORT ALLIANCE
    3× · 2018–2022 · $2k · revenue +1%
  • TJ
    The Joe Martin ALS Foundation
    2× · 2023–2024 · $750 · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • OI
    OPTIONS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +46%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Counseling Services of Chapel Hill

We provide accessible biblical counseling and training, walking alongside hurting people, which leads to Christ-centered hope, help, and healing, for the Triangle and beyond.

Health
2
Homes of Hope Inc

Provied temporary and emergency and low income housing and secured shelter.

Housing & Shelter
3
Safe Harbor of Nc Inc

Safe Harbor provides a faith-based community for rebuilding, renewing, and recovery. We work together with volunteers and other nonprofit organizations to provide a wide range of services to those experiencing homelessness, single mothers,…

Health
4
Hope Harbor Home Inc

Hope Harbor Home strives to break the cycle of domestic and sexual violence in Brunswick County, North Carolina.

—
5
Shalom House Ministries Inc

Shalom House Ministries Inc operates a treatment center for women struggling with drug and alcohol addition. It also offers transitional dwelling for women who need a safe place after treatment.

Health
6
Mens Shelter of Charlotte Inc

Helping homeless men by providing a safe shelter and meeting their basic needs as well as address barriers related to homelessness and self-sufficiency and helping homeless men to obtain and maintain more appropriate housing.

—
7
House of Hope of Nc Inc

Home, Counseling & Support for Hurting Teens

Education
8
Cleveland County Abuse Prevention Council Inc

The Abuse Prevention Council provides emergency, advocacy, counseling, education and specialized services for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and homeless individuals and families.

Crime & Legal
9
Habitat for Humanity of Burke County Inc

Habitat for humanity works in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to develop communities with gods people in need by building houses, so that there are decent homes in decent communities in whigh gods people…

Housing & Shelter
10
Sanctuary House Inc

Rehabilitation of the Mentally Ill

Human Services
11
The Harvest Center of Charlotte Inc

Create a community where individuals impacted by homelessness, poverty, and unemployment are empowered through our transitional programs and transformed by the love and ministry of Jesus Christ.

Food & Nutrition
12
Restorative Transitions Inc

Re-entry Program in Durham NC

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Changed Choices Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Joe Martin Als Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEST BLVD MINISTRIES: $13,000 · OtherWEST BLVD MINISTRIESFirst Baptist Church: $12,750 · OtherFirst Baptist ChurchTABLE ROCK MIDDLE SCHOOL: $4,200 · OtherTABLE ROCK MIDDLE SCHOOLSALVATION ARMY: $4,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYHOUSE OF REFUGE INC: $3,500 · OtherHOSKINS PARK MINISTRY: $2,500 · Other+50 more: $33,967 · Other+50 moreADOPTION SUPPORT ALLIANCE: $1,500 · Human ServicesTHE OUTREACH CENTER: $600 · Human ServicesCrisis Assistance Ministry: $400 · Human ServicesThe Joe Martin ALS Foundation: $750 · HealthATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $500 · HealthBURKE PSYCHOSOCIAL SERVICES INC: $500 · HealthHebron Colony Ministries Inc: $250 · HealthHOSKINS PARK MINISTRIES INC: $500 · Housing & ShelterHumane Society of Charlotte Inc: $450 · AnimalsTelra Institute Inc: $450 · EducationChanged Choices Inc: $350 · Crime & LegalYouth Orchestras of Charlotte: $100 · Arts & Culture
Other$73,917Human Services$2,500Health$2,000Housing & Shelter$500Animals$450Education$450Crime & Legal$350Arts & Culture$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBURKE UNITED CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADOPTION SUPPORT ALLIANCE: $1,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOPTIONS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Joe Martin ALS Foundation: $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OUTREACH CENTER: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBURKE PSYCHOSOCIAL SERVICES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOSKINS PARK MINISTRIES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHumane Society of Charlotte Inc: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTelra Institute Inc: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCrisis Assistance Ministry: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChanged Choices Inc: $350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHebron Colony Ministries Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORIC BURKE FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYouth Orchestras of Charlotte: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BURKE UNITED CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ADOPTION SUPPORT ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds OPTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Joe Martin ALS Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE OUTREACH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BURKE PSYCHOSOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rostan Family FoundationNC15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rostan Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Burke County · Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Duck Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Duck Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Duck’s filings →

    More from the funding graph