Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dub and Murray Martin Cherokee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$131kArts & Culture$48kFood & Nutrition$39kReligion$24kHealth$10kCommunity Improvement$7kPhilanthropy$6kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$688k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HINTON RURAL LIFE CENTER$5,000
CHEROKEE COUNTY SHARING CENTER INC$4,000
BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOMES OF NORTH CA INC$4,000
CLAY COUNTY HEARTS FOR KIDS AND SENIORS$4,000
LILITH LIDSEEN PERFORM ARTS ASSOC INC$3,000
SOCIETY ST VINCENT DEPAUL ST WILLIAM CON$2,500
THE STILL PLACE INC$2,500
REACH OF CHEROKEE COUNTY INC$2,500
BRASSTOWN CONCERT ASSOCIATION INC$1,500
VALLEY RIVER ARTS GUILD INC$1,000
NORTH CAROLINA SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC$1,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH MURPHY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THE STILL PLACE INC: $5k → 14%CLAY COUNTY HEARTS FOR KIDS AND SENIORS: $4k → 14%REACH OF CHEROKEE COUNTY INC: $3k → 15%THE STILL PLACE INC: $3k → 14%THE STILL PLACE INC: $2k → 14%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 15%THE STILL PLACE INC: $2k → 14%CLAY COUNTY HEARTS FOR KIDS AND SENIORS: $1k → 14%REACH OF CHEROKEE COUNTY INC: $3k → 15%THE STILL PLACE INC: $1k → 14%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 15%REACH OF CHEROKEE COUNTY INC: $700 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$244k · 22 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
7

Total granted

$244k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+24%

Still filing today

50%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHEROKEE COUNTY SHARING CENTER INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $29k · revenue +13%
  • LL
    Lillith Lidseen Performing Arts Assocation Inc
    6× · 2018–2025 · $15k · revenue +50%
  • RO
    REACH OF CHEROKEE COUNTY INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $6k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • US
    UMAR SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue -12%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL ST WILLIAM
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Clay Comprehensive Health Services

To provide quality affordable rural medical services

—
2
Hickory County Cares

Food distribution to the needy

Human Services
3
Carolina Civic Center

A theater for community theatrical groups, cultural, performance and other cultural or historical activities.

Community Improvement
4
Faith Christian Ministries of Nash County

Provide assistance to individuals in need in the nash county, north carolina area.

Religion
5
Saluda Nursing Center

The center operates a skilled nursing facility for the aged and participates under both the medicaid and medicare programs.

—
6
Feed-a-Child Wnc Inc

Provide food and supplies for the low income and needy

Food & Nutrition
7
Community Resource Center of Chattooga

To acquire and distribute resouces to bring relief to those in financial need in chattooga county and to walk out the words of jesus.

Food & Nutrition
8
The Shepherds Center of Charlotte

The Shepherds Center of Charlotte enriches the lives of older adults by providing a network of support to increase social connection, expand access to critical resources, and combat the negative effects of isolation.

—
9
The Children's Center of Western North Carolina

At The Childrens Center of Western North Carolina (TCC), we are dedicated to creating an inclusive, playful, and nuturing environment where children can grow and learn together in acceptance of one another.

Human Services
10
South Davidson Family Resource Center Inc

To provide services and resources to individuals and families in crisis.

Human Services
11
Caramore Community

To empower adults living with severe and persistent mental illness in north carolina with the tools to lead meaningful and independent lives.

—
12
Black Mountain Counseling Center in

As a non-profit, the black mountain counseling center provides mental health counseling without regard to a client's ability to pay. services are provided by licensed, experienced counselors working with children, adults and families…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Womens Resource Center; the most unlike its peers is Lillith Lidseen Performing Arts Assocation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HINTON RURAL LIFE CENTER INC: $34,000 · OtherHINTON RURAL LIFE CENTER INCTRUETT CHILDRENS HOME: $33,000 · OtherTRUETT CHILDRENS HOMEBRASSTOWN COMMUNITY CIVIC CENTER INC: $20,000 · OtherBRASSTOWN COMMUNITY CIVIC CENTER INCBRASSTOWN CONCERT ASSOCIATION INC: $8,250 · OtherBRASSTOWN CONCERT ASSOCIATION INCMATT'S MINISTRY: $7,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $7,000 · OtherTEXANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CLUB INC: $7,000 · OtherSHEPHERD OF THE MOUNTAINS CHURCH: $6,500 · OtherTHE JACKIE WARD FOUNDATION FOR: $5,500 · Other+10 more: $26,250 · Other+10 moreCHEROKEE COUNTY SHARING CENTER INC: $29,000 · Food & NutritionCHEROKEE COUNTY …CLAY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionCLAY COUNTY FOOD…Lillith Lidseen Performing Arts Assocation Inc: $14,800 · Arts & CultureLillith Lidseen …CHEROKEE COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL OF NC: $8,500 · Arts & CultureCHEROKEE COUNTY …VALLEY RIVER ARTS GUILD INC: $8,500 · Arts & CultureVALLEY RIVER ART…One Dozen Who Care Inc: $6,000 · Arts & CultureOne Dozen Who Ca…+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE STILL PLACE INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesTHE STILL PL…REACH OF CHEROKEE COUNTY INC: $6,200 · Human ServicesREACH OF CHE…WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $5,000 · Human ServicesWOMENS RESOU…CLAY COUNTY HEARTS FOR KIDS: $5,000 · Human ServicesCLAY COUNTY …BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOMES OF NORTH CAROLINA INCORPORATED: $4,000 · ReligionCHRISTIAN LOVE MINISTRIES INC: $3,500 · Health
Other$154,500Food & Nutrition$39,000Arts & Culture$38,800Human Services$28,700Religion$4,000Health$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHEROKEE COUNTY SHARING CENTER INC: $29,000 over 6y, 6.6% of budgetLillith Lidseen Performing Arts Assocation Inc: $14,800 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetTHE STILL PLACE INC: $12,500 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetCLAY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $10,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetVALLEY RIVER ARTS GUILD INC: $8,500 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetREACH OF CHEROKEE COUNTY INC: $6,200 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOne Dozen Who Care Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetWOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $5,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetCLAY COUNTY HEARTS FOR KIDS: $5,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetUMAR SERVICES INC: $3,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN LOVE MINISTRIES INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH CAROLINA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHEROKEE COUNTY SHARING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Lillith Lidseen Performing Arts Assocation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE STILL PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds CLAY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHEROKEE COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL OF NC ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY RIVER ARTS GUILD INC ↗
  • Who funds REACH OF CHEROKEE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds One Dozen Who Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CLAY COUNTY HEARTS FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOMES OF NORTH CAROLINA INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds UMAR SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN LOVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dogwood Health TrustNC17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dogwood Health Trust · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Nantahala Health Foundation · Wnc Bridge Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dub and Murray Martin Cherokee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dub and Murray Martin Cherokee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dub and Murray Martin Cherokee?

    Find your warmest path to Dub and Murray Martin Cherokee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dub and Murray Martin Cherokee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph