· Public charity
Nantahala Health Foundation
Improving health and well-being for those living in westernmost North Carolina.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $280k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Swain County Schools | $85,000 |
| Western Carolina Pacesetters | $65,000 |
| One Dozen Who Care | $45,000 |
| HIGHTS | $36,000 |
| Graham County Schools | $16,000 |
| Hawthorne Heights | $13,184 |
| Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians | $12,736 |
| Appalachian Sustainable Agriculture Project | $12,500 |
| Four Square Community Action | $12,500 |
| Highlands Emergency Council | $12,500 |
| Vecinos | $12,500 |
| Cherokee County Food Bank Inc | $12,500 |
| Child Medical Collaborative | $12,500 |
| Cherokee Clay Food Alliance | $12,500 |
| Sunrise Community for Recovery and Wellness | $12,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $157k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +86% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $246k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RERESOURCES EDUCATION ASST COUNSELING AND HOUSING OF MACON COUNTY INC3× · 2019–2021 · $150k · revenue +47%
- MPMOUNTAIN PROJECTS INC4× · 2019–2022 · $145k · revenue +86%
VECINOS INC5× · 2019–2024 · $145k · revenue ×12
Funded once
- ROROYAL ORDER OF JESTERSone grant, 2019 · $225k · revenue -60%
- SCSouthwestern Community College Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $107k · revenue +206% · 30% of their budget
- AWAdults Working & Advocating for Kids Empowerment Incgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $58k · revenue +66%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Restoring Hope Center, Inc. is a benovolence organization operating in Laurinburg, NC. The organization has benevolence programs providing food and supplies to the local area, supplies other smaller like-kind organizations, conducts a…
WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.
The Counseling Center strives to strengthen families and individuals by providing access to quality mental health services regardless of financial ability.
Food distribution to the needy
A collaborative network that increases access and improves health outcomes for safety net populations in western north carolina
Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST
The main operation is to establish a well grounded community for very low to moderate individuals
The free clinics (tfc) enhances the healthcare system in henderson county and neighboring communities to ensure the accessibility of quality healthcare for uninsured, low-income clients. tfc works with volunteers and partnering healthcare…
To support a community-led food system in WNC that is regenerative, resilient, and equitable by strengthening regional connection and cultivating cross-sector collaboration.
Providing healthcare to the underserved population of Harnett County NC and the surrounding area.
The mission of hospice & community care is to give hope, comfort, and compassion to those that need it most. hospice & community care is a nonprofit healthcare organization providing hospice and palliative care to residents of york,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wnc Bridge Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Royal Order of Jesters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROYAL ORDER OF JESTERS ↗
- Who funds RESOURCES EDUCATION ASST COUNSELING AND HOUSING OF MACON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds VECINOS INC ↗
- Who funds WESTERN CAROLINA PACESETTERS INC ↗
- Who funds HIGHTS Inc ↗
- Who funds Southwestern Community College Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds RESTORATION HOUSE WNC ↗
- Who funds Hospice House Foundation of WNC Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC OF FRANKLIN INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Adults Working & Advocating for Kids Empowerment Inc ↗
- Who funds GUIDING SHEEP MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CHEROKEE COUNTY UNITED FUND INC ↗
- Who funds FOUR SQUARE COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds CHEROKEE INDIAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VETERAN SMILES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds One Dozen Who Care Inc ↗
- Who funds CLAY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds HERE in Jackson County Inc ↗
- Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES OF JACKSON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS HEALTH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds GRACE EXTENDED MINISTRIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dogwood Health Trust · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Highlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc · Wnc Bridge Foundation · Manna Food Bank Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · Great Smokies Health Foundation · Evergreen Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Impact Health · Pisgah Health Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Nantahala Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Nantahala Health Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Nantahala Health Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.