Skip to content

· Private foundation

Drees Homes Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.7MHealth$988kPublic Benefit$939kHuman Services$656kReligion$600kArts & Culture$510kHousing & Shelter$500kPhilanthropy$425kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k9 grants · $975k
  • $250k+2 grants · $650k
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEARNING GROVE$400,000
SCOUTING AMERICA DAN BEARD COUNCIL$250,000
CHILDRENS HOME OF NKY$200,000
Individual grant recipient$150,000
ENZWEILER BUILDING INSTITUTE$125,000
SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL$100,000
SAINT PATRICK SCHOOL$100,000
NEWPORT CENTRAL CATHOLIC$100,000
THE POINT ARC$100,000
ACUE CO DIOCESE OF COVINGTON$50,000
THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $500k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILDREN'S HOME OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY: $150k → 11%THE POINT ARC: $100k → 11%THE POINT ARC: $100k → 11%LIFE LEARNING CENTER: $50k → 11%LIFE LEARNING CENTER: $50k → 11%LIFE LEARNING CENTER: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 18 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$4.3M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+3%

Still filing today

44%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $600k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LG
    LEARNING GROVE INC
    2× · 2020–2025 · $650k · revenue +18%
  • EB
    ENZWEILER BUILDING INSTITUTE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $375k · revenue +26%
  • SE
    St Elizabeth Medical Center Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $300k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF COVINGTON
    one grant, 2024 · $939k
  • S
    SPARKHAUS
    one grant, 2024 · $250k
  • VH
    VENT HAVEN MUSEUM
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue -54% · 58% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Elizabeth Seton Housing Corporation

Elizabeth Seton Housing Corporation provides housing for adults with developmental disabilities who have complex support needs in small residential home environments. The Corporation is operated in connection with the mission of St. Joseph…

Human Services
2
Carmelite Sisters of the Divine Heart of Jesus of Kentucky

The carmelite sisters of the divine heart of jesus of kentucky strive to maintain our home as a true home away from home for our residents. our residents are senior citizens and disabled residents.

—
3
Cincinnati's Optimum Residential Environments Inc

Residential & Habilitative Svs. Provide residential and habilitative services to adults with developmental disabilities

Health
4
St Joseph Care Center

To help residents live to their fullest potential, recognizing the changing needs of each person.

Health
5
Day Spring Inc

Day spring provides a path forward for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities through services that cultivate hope, belonging, and community.we envision every person being valued and having a path forward regardless of…

Human Services
6
Kentucky River Community Care Inc

The Organization provides mental/development disability and drug and alcohol rehabilitation services to an eight-county area in Southeastern Kentucky. During the year, approximately 9,667 people benefited from this program.

Health
7
Ccmh Corporation

Provide a healthcare facility offering acure care, skilled care, outpatient services, and emergency medical services to residents of carroll county, kentucky and surrounding areas.

Health
8
Bridgewater Home Inc

Assisted Living and Nursing Care

Human Services
9
Jefferson Hills Corporation

Jefferson hills provides a safe, secure, and supportive treatment and learning environment, preparing at-risk youth and their families to function more effectively in our communities.

—
10
Garden Path Elder Living Inc

Garden Path Elder Living operates a residential care home for elders that provide assistance with daily living and nursing oversight.

Human Services
11
Independent Living Options Inc

Empowering people with disabilities to live independent lives in the community.

—
12
St John's - St Vincent's Home for Chil

St john's home for children is a leader in delivering innovative and therapeutic services, in collaboration with our community partners and resources, to promote healing and growth for our children and family prosperity and resilience.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Learning Grove Inc; the most unlike its peers is Joseph House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF COVINGTON: $939,498 · OtherCITY OF COVINGTONLEARNING GROVE INC: $650,000 · OtherLEARNING GROVE INCCHILDRENS HOME OF NKY: $450,000 · OtherCHILDRENS HOME OF NKYNEWPORT CENTRAL CATHOLIC: $300,000 · OtherNEWPORT CENTRAL CATHOLICEMERGENCY SHELTER OF NKY: $300,000 · OtherEMERGENCY SHELTER OF NKYNOTRE DAME ACADEMY: $250,000 · OtherSCOUTING AMERICA DAN BEARD COUNCIL: $250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $250,000 · OtherSPARKHAUS: $250,000 · OtherACUE CO DIOCESE OF COVINGTON: $200,000 · OtherTHE CATALYTIC FUND OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY: $200,000 · OtherHorizon Community Fund: $175,000 · Other+9 more: $788,700 · Other+9 moreENZWEILER BUILDING INSTITUTE INC: $375,000 · EducationENZWEILER…THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC: $200,000 · EducationTHOMAS MO…THE CHATFIELD EDGE: $25,000 · EducationSt Elizabeth Medical Center Inc: $300,000 · HealthRedwood School & Rehabilitation Inc: $180,000 · HealthJoseph House Inc: $75,000 · HealthTHE POINTARC OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY: $200,000 · Human ServicesLife Learning Center Inc: $150,000 · Human ServicesChildren's Home of Northern Kentucky Inc: $150,000 · Human ServicesVENT HAVEN MUSEUM: $200,000 · Arts & CultureBEHRINGER CRAWFORD MUSEUM: $60,000 · Arts & CultureEmergency Shelter of Northern KY Inc: $200,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE BOONE CONSERVANCY INC: $50,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$5,003,198Education$600,000Health$555,000Human Services$500,000Arts & Culture$260,000Housing & Shelter$200,000Recreation & Sports$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEARNING GROVE INC: $650,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetENZWEILER BUILDING INSTITUTE INC: $375,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetSt Elizabeth Medical Center Inc: $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC: $200,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVENT HAVEN MUSEUM: $200,000 over 1y, 58% of budgetEmergency Shelter of Northern KY Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE POINTARC OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY: $200,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetRedwood School & Rehabilitation Inc: $180,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetLife Learning Center Inc: $150,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetChildren's Home of Northern Kentucky Inc: $150,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetST JOSEPH HOME INC: $108,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetJoseph House Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBEHRINGER CRAWFORD MUSEUM: $60,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetTHE BOONE CONSERVANCY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetTHE CHATFIELD EDGE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEARNING GROVE INC ↗
  • Who funds ENZWEILER BUILDING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds St Elizabeth Medical Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds VENT HAVEN MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Emergency Shelter of Northern KY Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE POINTARC OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY ↗
  • Who funds Redwood School & Rehabilitation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Life Learning Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Children's Home of Northern Kentucky Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Joseph House Inc ↗
  • Who funds BEHRINGER CRAWFORD MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE BOONE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHATFIELD EDGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The R C Durr Foundation Inc 541 Buttermilk Pike Suite 500KY30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The R C Durr Foundation Inc 541 Buttermilk Pike Suite 500 · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · The Fischer Family Foundation 2008 · Horizon Community Funds of Northern Kentucky · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Butler Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · George and Mary Jo Budig Family Foundati Foundation C/O George J Budig · St Elizabeth Medical Center Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Drees Homes Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Drees Homes Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Drees Homes Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Drees Homes Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Drees Homes’ filings →

    More from the funding graph