Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dreams33 Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$493k
Granted FY2021
7
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202021.

Health$932kRecreation & Sports$125kPhilanthropy$115kEducation$114kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kArts & Culture$3k
02FY2021 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $63k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$37,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNRAVEL PEDIATRIC CANCER$250,000
BONNIE J ADDARIO LUNG CANCER FOUNDATIONGO2 FOUNDATION$125,000
GIANTS COMMUNITY FUND$50,000
SAN JOSE STATE - FRIENDS OF THE BRENNAN FAMILY FOOTBALL FACILITY FUND$37,500
SAN JOSE STATE - FOOTBALL PROGRAM$25,000
SAINT FRANCIS HIGH SCHOOL$3,820
FRANKLIN TEMPLETON ANNUAL HEB AWARD RECEPIENTS$1,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BONNIE J ADDARIO LUNG CANCER FOUNDATIONGO2 FOUNDATION: $125k → 7%WENDER WEIS FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%GIANTS COMMUNITY FUND: $50k → 10%FRANKLIN TEMPLETON ANNUAL HEB AWARD RECEPIENTS: $1k → 12%BONNIE J ADDARIO LUNG CANCER FOUNDATION: $125k → 7%PIVOTAL CONNECTIONS: $5k → 8%THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SF STATE: $10k → 10%FRANKLIN TEMPLETON ANNUAL HEB AWARD RECEPIENTS: $1k → 12%WOODSIDE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $70k → 7%SAINT FRANCIS HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 8%GO2 FOUNDATION FOR LUNG CANCER: $15k → 8%SAINT FRANCIS HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 8%CHILDRENS HEALTH COUNCIL: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$914k · 6 repeat orgs$425k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +88% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$914k
$300k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%
+3%

Still filing today

33%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
HealthEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • U
    UNRAVEL
    2× · 2020–2021 · $657k · revenue -18% · 38% of their budget
  • GC
    GIANTS COMMUNITY FUND
    2× · 2020–2021 · $100k · revenue +88%
  • SJ
    SAN JOSE STATE - FRIENDS OF THE BRENNAN FAMILY FOOTBALL FACILITY FUND
    2× · 2020–2021 · $75k

Funded once

  • GF
    GO2 For Lung Cancer
    one grant, 2020 · $140k · revenue -12%
  • WS
    WOODSIDE SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $70k · revenue +2%
  • EA
    EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNRAVEL — $657,340 · HealthUNRAVELGO2 For Lung Cancer — $140,000 · HealthGO2 For Lung Cancer+1 more — $10,000 · HealthBONNIE J ADDARIO LUNG CANCER FOUNDATIONGO2 FOUNDATION — $125,000 · OtherBONNIE J ADDARIO LUNG CANCER …SAN JOSE STATE - FRIENDS OF THE BRENNAN FAMILY FOOTBALL FACILITY FUND — $75,000 · OtherSAN JOSE STATE - FRIENDS OF T…SAN JOSE STATE - FOOTBALL PROGRAM — $50,000 · OtherSAN JOSE STATE - FOOTBALL PRO…EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FUND — $50,000 · OtherEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FUNDSAINT FRANCIS HIGH SCHOOL — $28,820 · OtherSAINT FRANCIS HIGH SCHOOLWENDER WEIS FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Other+2 more — $7,500 · OtherGIANTS COMMUNITY FUND — $100,000 · PhilanthropyWOODSIDE SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $70,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE — $10,000 · Education
Health$807,340Other$351,320Philanthropy$100,000Education$80,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNRAVEL — $657,340 over 2y, 38% of budgetGO2 For Lung Cancer — $140,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetGIANTS COMMUNITY FUND — $100,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetWOODSIDE SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPIVOTAL CONNECTIONS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNRAVEL
  • Who funds GO2 For Lung Cancer
  • Who funds GIANTS COMMUNITY FUND
  • Who funds WOODSIDE SCHOOL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds PIVOTAL CONNECTIONS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN12.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dreams33 Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph