Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dream Alliance

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$193k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Human Services$64kFood & Nutrition$63kAnimals$43kPublic Benefit$20kHousing & Shelter$18kYouth Development$18kArts & Culture$15kCommunity Improvement$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $115k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN FIRST$35,000
TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK$20,000
Volunteers of America - Texas$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,450
THEATER ARLINGTON$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Girls Inc$10,000
COMMUMITY GARDEN KITCHEN$8,000
Community Lifeline Center$7,500
Community Food Pantry of McKinney$7,500
Boys Girls Clubs of Collin County$7,500
Streetside Showers$7,500
MEALS ON WHEELS COLLIN CO$7,500
Farmhouse Fresh Animal Sanctuary$7,500
Cloud covered Streets$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Cloud covered Streets: $5k → 11%The Grace Center: $1k → 10%Streetside Showers: $8k → 5%MEALS ON WHEELS COLLIN CO: $8k → 5%Community Food Pantry of McKinney: $8k → 5%Community Lifeline Center: $8k → 5%MEALS ON WHEELS COLLIN CO: $5k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 89% of Dream Alliance’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 100%.

Dream Alliancelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$163k · 9 repeat orgs$116k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against -75% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$163k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
-75%

Still filing today

56%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    Tarrant Area Food Bank
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue +23%
  • TA
    THEATRE ARLINGTON INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +14%
  • OK
    OPERATION KINDNESS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $6k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • KO
    Knights of Columbus dba Central Tex
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • BF
    Blanco FFA Booster Club Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • T4
    Texas 4-H Foundation Blanco County
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding the Lone Star Llc

Uniting volunteers to prepare meals that get delivered to the food insecure

Food & Nutrition
2
Central Texas Animal Sanctuary

Animal rescue and rehabilitation

Animals
3
North Dallas Food Pantry

North Dallas Food Pantry (DBA NTX Community Food Pantry) is dedicated to building relationships by sharing resources, hope and faith in a welcoming environment, with love and dignaty.

Human Services
4
Animal Friends of Port Aransas Inc

Provide veterinary and shelter services for displaced and wayward animals in the township and outlying area of port aransas, texas.

Animals
5
Texas Rescue Inc
Animals
6
Puppy Food Bank

Our mission is simple: end pet hunger! with online and mail in donations as well as event fundraising, we eliminate food scarcity as a barrier to caring for homeless pets in north america. partnering with food distributors, together we can…

Animals
7
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
8
Central Texas Spca

Rescue neglected, unwanted homeless dogs and cats nurture and provide shelter until they are placed with a forever family strive to reduce animal overpopulation prevent cruelty to animals teach responsible pet ownership through an outreach…

Animals
9
Keep Austin Fed

Reduce hunger and help the environment by connecting surplus food with our neighbors in need.

Food & Nutrition
10
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
11
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
12
Arlington Charities Inc

The organization provides food and other supportive services to local residents in arlington, texas who are in need of assistance.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Operation Kindness; the most unlike its peers is Cloud Covered Streets. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
5/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN FIRST INC: $55,241 · OtherCHILDREN FIRST INCTarrant Area Food Bank: $25,000 · OtherTarrant Area Food BankVolunteers of America - Texas: $20,000 · OtherVolunteers of America - TexasIndividual grant recipient: $15,450 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOMMUMITY GARDEN KITCHEN: $13,000 · OtherCOMMUMITY GARDEN KITCHENGirls Inc: $10,000 · OtherKnights of Columbus dba Central Tex: $10,000 · OtherBoys Girls Clubs of Collin County: $7,500 · Other+11 more: $30,500 · Other+11 moreMEALS ON WHEELS COLLIN COUNTY: $12,500 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS …COMMUNITY LIFELINE CENTER: $7,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY LIFELI…STREETSIDE SHOWERS INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesSTREETSIDE SHOWE…COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $7,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOOD P…CLOUD COVERED STREETS: $5,000 · Human ServicesCLOUD COVERED ST…+1 more: $1,050 · Human ServicesFARMHOUSE FRESH ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $7,500 · AnimalsOPERATION KINDNESS: $6,000 · AnimalsCODYS FRIENDS RESCUE: $2,000 · AnimalsNORTH TEXAS WILDLIFE CENTER: $1,000 · AnimalsTHEATRE ARLINGTON INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureKENDALL COUNTY JUNIOR LIVESTOCK ASSOCIAT: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$201,691Human Services$41,050Animals$16,500Arts & Culture$15,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN FIRST INC: $55,241 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHEATRE ARLINGTON INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS COLLIN COUNTY: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY LIFELINE CENTER: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSTREETSIDE SHOWERS INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFARMHOUSE FRESH ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $7,500 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetOPERATION KINDNESS: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKENDALL COUNTY JUNIOR LIVESTOCK ASSOCIAT: $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCLOUD COVERED STREETS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCODYS FRIENDS RESCUE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GRACE CENTER: $1,050 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS WILDLIFE CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN FIRST INC ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds THEATRE ARLINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS COLLIN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LIFELINE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds STREETSIDE SHOWERS INC ↗
  • Who funds FARMHOUSE FRESH ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION KINDNESS ↗
  • Who funds KENDALL COUNTY JUNIOR LIVESTOCK ASSOCIAT ↗
  • Who funds CLOUD COVERED STREETS ↗
  • Who funds CODYS FRIENDS RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds THE GRACE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS WILDLIFE CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX18× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dream Alliance funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dream Alliance. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dream Alliance?

    Find your warmest path to Dream Alliance through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dream Alliance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph