Skip to content

· Private foundation

Drake Gungoll Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$77k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$60kHealth$49kArts & Culture$44kEducation$40kReligion$40kYouth Development$28kCommunity Improvement$20kFood & Nutrition$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASADY SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND$10,000
OKC MUSEUM OF ART$10,000
NICHOLS HILLS PARKS INC$10,000
WESTMINISTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$10,000
JUNIOR LEAGUE OF OKC$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OK COUNTY$7,500
INTEGRIS FOUNDATION$5,000
OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION$5,000
SALVATION ARMY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA$1,000
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA$1,000
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION$1,000
FREE TO LIVE ANIMAL SANCTUARY$1,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$1,000
CHEROKEE STRIP REGIONAL HERITAGE CENTER$1,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION OKC CHAPTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%THE CARE CENTER: $1k → 16%THE CARE CENTER: $1k → 16%THE CARE CENTER: $1k → 16%THE CARE CENTER: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$306k · 23 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
0

Total granted

$306k
$0

Still filing today

48%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NICHOLS HILLS PARKS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue +75%
  • IH
    INTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $21k · revenue +13%
  • JL
    JUNIOR LEAGUE OF OKLAHOMA CITY OKLAHOMA INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +67%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

    The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

    —
    2
    Oklahoma Hospital Association Inc

    The mission of the Oklahoma Hospital Association is to promote the welfare of the public by representing its members and advocating on their behalf, providing services to assist its members in meeting the health care needs of their…

    —
    3
    Foundation for a Healthy Oklahoma

    The mission of the Foundation for a Healthy Oklahoma is exclusively for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes. The activities of the Corporation may include: (A) Promoting the good health and welfare (continued on Schedule O)

    Health
    4
    Oklahoma Association of Realtors

    The oklahoma association of realtors connects real estate professionals across the state by providing comprehensive professional resources, maintaining the highest ethical standards and giving realtors a unified voice in shaping oklahoma…

    —
    5
    Northwest Oklahoma Blood Institute
    —
    6
    Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
    Arts & Culture
    7
    Oklahoma Hall of Fame

    The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

    Arts & Culture
    8
    Saint Francis Hospital Inc

    To extend the presence and healing ministry of christ in all we do.

    Health
    9
    Oklahoma Optometric Association

    The oklahoma association of optometric physicians is a professional association dedicated to advocacy, education, and other resources for oklahoma optometric physicians. mission statement: unite. empower. advocate.

    —
    10
    The State Chamber Research Foundation

    The State Chamber Research Foundation strives to support Oklahoma's growth and increase prosperity for all Oklahomans. We create solution orientated programming, advance research and policy, and provide sound data geared to advancing…

    Unclassified
    11
    Oklahoma State Medical Association

    Osma's vision is to be the leading voice in health care for oklahoma's patients, families and physicians. osma's mission is better health for oklahoma.

    —
    12
    Okmulgee Area Development Corp

    Economic development in okmulgee county

    Community Improvement
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Oklahoma County Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    11/11
    Grantees still filing
    8/11
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherWESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCASADY SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherCASADY SCHOOLCASADY SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND: $20,000 · OtherCASADY SCHOOL ANNUAL FUNDWESTMINISTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherWESTMINISTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHJUNIOR LEAGUE OF OKC: $20,000 · OtherJUNIOR LEAGUE OF OKCBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OK COUNTY: $15,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OK COUNTY+8 more: $24,000 · Other+8 moreOKLAHOMA CITY MUSEUM OF ART INC FKA OKLAHOMA CITY ART MUSEUM: $40,000 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA CITY MU…Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center Inc: $4,000 · Arts & CultureCherokee Strip R…INTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc: $21,000 · HealthINTEGRIS Health…Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $16,000 · HealthOklahoma Medica…American Diabetes Association: $4,000 · HealthAmerican Diabet…NICHOLS HILLS PARKS INC: $40,000 · Recreation & SportsNICHOLS HILLS …JUNIOR LEAGUE OF OKLAHOMA CITY OKLAHOMA INC: $20,000 · Community ImprovementBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC: $12,500 · Youth DevelopmentREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $9,243 · Food & Nutrition
    Other$139,000Arts & Culture$44,000Health$41,000Recreation & Sports$40,000Community Improvement$20,000Youth Development$12,500Food & Nutrition$9,243

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOKLAHOMA CITY MUSEUM OF ART INC FKA OKLAHOMA CITY ART MUSEUM: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNICHOLS HILLS PARKS INC: $40,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetINTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc: $21,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF OKLAHOMA CITY OKLAHOMA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $9,243 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCare Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc DBA The CARE Center: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY MUSEUM OF ART INC FKA OKLAHOMA CITY ART MUSEUM ↗
    • Who funds NICHOLS HILLS PARKS INC ↗
    • Who funds INTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc ↗
    • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF OKLAHOMA CITY OKLAHOMA INC ↗
    • Who funds Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ↗
    • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC ↗
    • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
    • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
    • Who funds Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center Inc ↗
    • Who funds CENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
    • Who funds Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc DBA The CARE Center ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Inasmuch FoundationOK22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Inasmuch Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Fred Jones Family Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · Ad Astra Foundation · Harry and Louise Brown Foundation · Rainbolt Family Foundation · Crowe & Dunlevy Foundation Inc · Records Johnston Family Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Drake Gungoll Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Drake Gungoll Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 31%
    • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: 31% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Drake Gungoll Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Drake Gungoll Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Drake Gungoll’s filings →

    More from the funding graph