Skip to content
Dr Stephen and Kirsten Hosman Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Dr Stephen and Kirsten Hosman Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$96k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Religion$76kEducation$41kArts & Culture$25kAnimals$20kEnvironment$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kYouth Development$500
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $74k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NE FOUNDATION$40,000
SAINT ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$21,150
BETHESDA BY THE SEA CHURCH$13,150
SARASOTA ART MUSEUM$7,500
MARIE SELBY BOTANICAL GARDENS$5,000
ZOO TAMPA$5,000
HENRY B PLANT MUSEUM$2,500
TAMPA BAY HISTORY CENTER$1,000
ARCHITECTURE SARASOTA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNIVERSITY OF NE FOUNDATION: $40k → 13%SARASOTA ART MUSEUM: $8k → 9%SUNCOAST HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 9%SAINT ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $21k → 11%BETHESDA BY THE SEA CHURCH: $13k → 11%ZOO TAMPA: $5k → 13%SARASOTA ART MUSEUM: $8k → 9%ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $21k → 11%ZOO TAMPA: $5k → 13%MARIE SELBY BOTANICAL GARDENS: $5k → 9%ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $21k → 11%HENRY B PLANT MUSEUM: $3k → 13%MARIE SELBY BOTANICAL GARDENS: $5k → 9%BOCA GRANDE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $200 → 11%HENRY PLANT MUSEUM UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA: $3k → 13%ARCHITECTURE SARASOTA: $500 → 9%HENRY PLANT MUSEUM UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA: $3k → 13%ARCHITECTURE SARASOTA: $500 → 9%JUNIOR LEAGUE OF TAMPA: $885 → 13%JUNIOR LEAGUE OF TAMPA: $250 → 13%TAMPA MUSEUM OF ART: $1k → 13%TAMPA BAY HISTORY CENTER: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$84k · 7 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$84k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+13%

Still filing today

57%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentAnimalsYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LP
    Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +1%
  • THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF TAMPA INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1k · revenue +47%
  • AS
    ARCHITECTURE SARASOTA INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • SH
    SUNCOAST HUMANE SOCIETYINC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • TM
    TAMPA MUSEUM OF ART INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +313%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
2
Mote Marine Laboratory Inc

The advancement of marine and environmental sciences through scientific research, education and public outreach, leading new discoveries, revitalization and sustainability of our oceans and greater public understanding of our marine…

—
3
Museum of Science & Industry Inc

Serve the public as a community-based institution and educational resource that is dedicated to advancing public interest, knowledge and understanding of science, industry and technology.

Arts & Culture
4
Saint Peters Landmark Preservation Trust
—
5
Tampa Museum of Art Foundation Inc

Maintain and raise funds for the benefit of the tampa museum of art, inc.

Arts & Culture
6
The Conservancy of Southwest Florida

We are a grassroots organization focused on the critical environmental issues of sw florida. we accomplish this through a myriad of efforts by the teams in our programmatic departments: science, policy, education and wildlife…

—
7
Institute of Contemporary Art Miami Inc

The institute of contemporary art, miami (ica miami), is dedicated to promoting the work of contemporary artists, and to the exchange of art and ideas throughout the miami region and internationally. through an energetic calendar of…

Arts & Culture
8
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
9
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
10
The John & Mable Ringling Museum of Art Foundation Incorporated

The ringling is a place of art, architecture, and circus in an environment that inspires, educates, entertains, and honors the legacy of john & mable ringling.

Arts & Culture
11
The Museum of Fine Arts Houston

The museum of fine arts, houston serves as a welcoming and inclusive place for all people, connecting the communities of houston with diverse histories of art spanning 6,000 years and six continents. through our permanent collections,…

Arts & Culture
12
Texas State Aquarium Association

The texas state aquarium's mission is engaging people with animals, inspiring appreciation for our seas, and supporting wildlife conservation. its vision is to be a global leader in fostering support for the conservation of the gulf of…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Junior League of Tampa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $41,502 · OtherST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCHSAINT ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $21,150 · OtherSAINT ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCHSARASOTA ART MUSEUM: $15,000 · OtherSARASOTA ART MUSEUMBETHESDA BY THE SEA CHURCH: $13,150 · OtherBETHESDA BY THE SEA CHURCHHENRY PLANT MUSEUM UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA: $5,000 · Other+2 more: $2,700 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $40,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOU…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationSUNCOAST HUMANE SOCIETYINC: $10,000 · AnimalsSUNCOAST HUMA…Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc: $10,000 · AnimalsLowry Park Zo…The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc: $10,000 · EnvironmentTHE TAMPA BAY HISTORY CENTER: $1,000 · EnvironmentTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF TAMPA INC: $1,135 · Community ImprovementTAMPA MUSEUM OF ART INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureYOUNG LIFE: $500 · Youth Development
Other$98,502Education$41,000Animals$20,000Environment$11,000Community Improvement$1,135Arts & Culture$1,000Youth Development$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNCOAST HUMANE SOCIETYINC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF TAMPA INC: $1,135 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARCHITECTURE SARASOTA INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TAMPA BAY HISTORY CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAMPA MUSEUM OF ART INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Frank E Duckwall Foun…Lightning FoundationVinik Family Foundati…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Pfizer Foundation…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Frank E Duckwall FoundationFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Frank E Duckwall Foundation · Lightning Foundation · Vinik Family Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dr Stephen and Kirsten Hosman Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dr Stephen and Kirsten Hosman Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Tampa Museum of Art Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dr Stephen and Kirsten Hosman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home