Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dr and Mrs Hugh a Kennedy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$596k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$158k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.4MHealth$1.3MReligion$935kArts & Culture$384kHuman Services$216kYouth Development$205kPhilanthropy$195kCommunity Improvement$158kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $210k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $387k
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRISTUS SPOHN DEVELPMENT FDN$157,871
ST PATRICK'S CHURCH$95,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$82,000
SOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING$52,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-OSHKOSH FDN$40,000
SOUTH TEXAS COUNCIL SCOUTING AMERI$30,000
ST JOHN PAUL II ACADEMY$30,000
COASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$25,000
SALVATION ARMY - CORPUS CHRISTI$25,000
DEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION$15,000
TEXAS A&M UNIVERITY CORPUS CHRISTI$14,625
TIMON'S MINISTRIES$10,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$10,000
ART CENTER OF CORPUS CHRISTI$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YWCA CORPUS CHRISTI: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 14 repeat orgs$478k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
10

Total granted

$4.2M
$215k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+23%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $262k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $738k · revenue +39%
  • UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $360k · revenue +39%
  • ST
    SOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM I
    9× · 2017–2025 · $247k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • CC
    COMPASSIONATE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC
    one grant, 2024 · $60k
  • AM
    ART MUSEUM OF SOUTH TEXAS
    one grant, 2017 · $45k
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS - SOUTH TEXAS
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Physician Services of South Texas

Provision of pediatric primary and subspecialty healthcare to patients in corpus christi and surrounding areas of south texas regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
2
Texas College

To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.

Education
3
Central Texas Christian School Inc

To educate students with the transforming truth of christ, inspiring academic excellence, godly character, and integrity in life pursuits.

—
4
Texas a&M-Corpus Christi Foundation

For the benefit of texas a&m university - corpus christi

Education
5
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
6
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
7
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
8
United Corpus Christi Chamber of Commerce

The united corpus christi chamber of commerce is a member-driven organization whose principal mission is to foster business growth by advocating business issues, enhancing the business climate, and providing services to its members.

Community Improvement
9
Texas a&M University-Central Tx Foundati

Operated exclusively for educational purposes specifically including to further educational activities at texas a& m university-central texas within the meaning of 501(c)(3).

Education
10
Western Texas College Foundation

The western texas college foundation serves western texas college by soliciting, receiving, and administering gifts and grants for student scholarships, educational and cultural activities, and campus facility improvement and development.

Education
11
Travis County Medical Society

Travis county medical society (tcms) represents the medical profession in matters of importance to the membership and the community it serves.

—
12
Corpus Christi Education Foundation

To enhance the education opportunities for corpus christi independent school district (ccisd) student by soliciting, managing, and distributing funds for enrichment purposes in program areas not otherwise funded by the ccisd.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Driscoll Children's Hospital; the most unlike its peers is University of Wisconsin Oshkosh Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM FDN: $1,195,819 · OtherCHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM FDNST PATRICKS CHURCH: $895,000 · OtherST PATRICKS CHURCHThe Salvation Army: $211,000 · OtherThe Salvation ArmySt John Paul II Catholic HS: $198,000 · OtherSt John Paul II Catholic HSCHRISTUS SPOHN DEVELPMENT FDN: $157,871 · Other+16 more: $474,625 · Other+16 moreUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $738,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN F…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH FOUNDATION INC: $360,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN O…+1 more: $12,250 · EducationSOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM I: $247,000 · Arts & CultureCOASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $195,000 · PhilanthropyDEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropyCOMPASSIONATE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC: $60,000 · HealthDriscoll Children's Hospital: $25,000 · HealthTENNIS SUCCESS INC: $55,000 · Recreation & SportsTIMON'S MINISTRIES: $10,000 · Food & NutritionYWCA CORPUS CHRISTI: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$3,132,315Education$1,110,250Arts & Culture$247,000Philanthropy$235,000Health$85,000Recreation & Sports$55,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $738,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH FOUNDATION INC: $360,000 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM I: $247,000 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetCOASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $195,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCOMPASSIONATE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC: $60,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTENNIS SUCCESS INC: $55,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetWEST SIDE HELPING HAND: $50,000 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetDEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDriscoll Children's Hospital: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI HOPE HOUSE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetRISE SCHOOL OF CORPUS CHRISTI: $12,250 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetYWCA CORPUS CHRISTI: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM I ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSIONATE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds TENNIS SUCCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST SIDE HELPING HAND ↗
  • Who funds DEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Driscoll Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds CORPUS CHRISTI HOPE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds RISE SCHOOL OF CORPUS CHRISTI ↗
  • Who funds TIMON'S MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds YWCA CORPUS CHRISTI ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ed Rachal FoundationTX32.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ed Rachal Foundation · Behmann Brothers Foundation · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · Allen Lovelace Moore and Blanche Davis Moore Foundation · Coastal Bend Community Foundation · United Way of the Coastal Bend Inc · Laverne & Thomas Howell Foundation · Yvonne H Simard Foundation · Susser Family Foundation · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · Estill Foundation · Devary Durrill Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dr and Mrs Hugh a Kennedy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dr and Mrs Hugh a Kennedy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dr and Mrs Hugh a Kennedy Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Dr and Mrs Hugh a Kennedy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dr and Mrs Hugh a Kennedy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph