· Private foundation
Devary Durrill Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k19 grants · $57k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS | $41,500 |
| YOUTH ODYSSEY | $25,000 |
| DRISCOLL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $13,000 |
| UNITED CORPUS CHRISTI CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $10,600 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| MAJESTY OUTDOORS | $10,000 |
| SALTWATER FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| BRINGING BAFFIN BACK SUPPORT FUND | $10,000 |
| FOCUS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| ART CENTER OF CORPUS CHRISTI | $10,000 |
| TEXAS STATE AQUARIUM | $7,500 |
| ART MUSEUM OF SOUTH TEXAS | $6,650 |
| NUECES COUNTY JR LIVESTOCK SHOW | $6,000 |
| TLC COMMUNITY CENTER | $5,363 |
| POLICE OFFICERS CHRISTMAS ANGELS | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $210k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WSWOMEN'S SHELTER OF SOUTH TEXAS6× · 2017–2024 · $321k · revenue +121%
- TATexas A&M Foundation2× · 2019–2021 · $200k · revenue +74%
- YOYOUTH ODYSSEY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $129k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- TATHE ARK ASSESSMENT CENTER AND EMERGENCY SHELTER FOR YOUTHone grant, 2018 · $52k · revenue -31%
- GAGUARDIAN ANGELSone grant, 2022 · $25k
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITYone grant, 2020 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The texas state aquarium's mission is engaging people with animals, inspiring appreciation for our seas, and supporting wildlife conservation. its vision is to be a global leader in fostering support for the conservation of the gulf of…
To support coastal conservation association in carrying out the charitable and educational purpose for which it was organized and is operated, namely, promoting and advancing the preservation, conservation and protection of marine, plant…
To promote Corsicana and the surrounding area.
The purpose of the texas chapter of the american college of cardiology is to contribute to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases, to ensure optimal quality of care for individuals with such diseases, and to foster the highest…
For the benefit of texas a&m university - corpus christi
Operated exclusively for educational purposes specifically including to further educational activities at texas a& m university-central texas within the meaning of 501(c)(3).
Coastal bend bays & estuaries program is dedicated to protecting and restoring bays and estuaries of the texas coastal bend. coastal bend bays and estuaries remain a vital part of the environmental and economic landscape by preserving and…
Travis county medical society (tcms) represents the medical profession in matters of importance to the membership and the community it serves.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas a&M Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Helicopters for Heroes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WOMEN'S SHELTER OF SOUTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds HELICOPTERS FOR HEROES ↗
- Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ODYSSEY INC ↗
- Who funds Driscoll Children's Hospital ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds CENIKOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HALO FLIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS ↗
- Who funds COASTAL BEND FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THE ARK ASSESSMENT CENTER AND EMERGENCY SHELTER FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds THE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNITED CORPUS CHRISTI CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE COASTAL BEND ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds COASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHOICE LIVING COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds SALTWATER-FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MAJESTY OUTDOORS ↗
- Who funds FOCUS FOUNDATION-FOR OUR CHILDRENS ULTIMATE SUCCESS ↗
- Who funds WEST SIDE HELPING HAND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Behmann Brothers Foundation · Ed Rachal Foundation · Coastal Bend Community Foundation · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · Susser Family Foundation · Cheniere Foundation · Allen Lovelace Moore and Blanche Davis Moore Foundation · United Way of the Coastal Bend Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · Yvonne H Simard Foundation · Frazier Family Foundation Inc · Earl C Sams Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Devary Durrill Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.