· Private foundation
Doy & Margaret McCall Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATURE CONSERVANCY OF ALABAMA | $6,375 |
| CHRIST CHURCH CATHEDRAL | $5,167 |
| UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA | $4,000 |
| FAULKNER UNIVERSITY | $4,000 |
| BELMONT UNIVERSITY | $2,500 |
| YWCA NASHVILLE AND MIDDLE TN | $1,917 |
| HEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK | $1,542 |
| THE HARPETH HALL SCHOOL | $1,500 |
| TULANE UNIVERSITY | $1,500 |
| VALIANT CROSS ACADEMY | $1,500 |
| TRINITY UNIVERSITY | $1,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH | $1,500 |
| LOST-N-FOUND YOUTH | $1,500 |
| THISTLE FARMS | $1,500 |
| ST JOHN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND6× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +44%
- PCPARK CENTER INC8× · 2017–2024 · $18k · revenue +108%
- TUTrinity University8× · 2018–2025 · $16k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- TVTHE VILLAGE OF SPRING HILL INCone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -37%
- CCCHRIST CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $5k
- SOSOCIETY OF 1868 INCone grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue -9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Belhaven university prepares students academically and spiritually to serve jesus christ in their careers, in human relationships, and in the world of ideas.
Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Building on a rich Presbyterian heritage and a pioneering spirit, Tusculum University provides an active and experiential education within a caring Christian environment to inspire civic engagement, enrich personal lives, and equip…
See Disclosure Above.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
We create opportunities for discovery and reflection by engaging the minds, hands, and hearts of our students.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The morningside university experience cultivates a passion for life-long learning and a dedication to ethical leadership and civic responsibility.
Spelman college, a historically black college and global leader in the education of women of african descent, is dedicated to the academic excellence of its students.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nashville Rescue Mission and the most unlike its peers is African Wildlife Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 54 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds PARK CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Trinity University ↗
- Who funds THISTLE FARMS INC ↗
- Who funds THE HARPETH HALL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH ↗
- Who funds Belmont University ↗
- Who funds MOBILE CARNIVAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Lost-N-Found Youth Inc ↗
- Who funds HEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY BELL ACADEMY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NASHVILLE ↗
- Who funds THE VILLAGE OF SPRING HILL INC ↗
- Who funds White House Association of Alabama ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds VALIANT CROSS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds BARTON ACADEMY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FAULKNER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF 1868 INC ↗
- Who funds BAYSIDE ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds UMS-WRIGHT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds JOEL LANE MUSEUM HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds STUDIO BY THE TRACKS INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANITIES TENNESSEE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hearin - Chandler Foundation · J L Bedsole Foundation Regions Bank Co-Trustee · The Ee Delaney Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Crampton Trust #1255000731 Regions Bank Trustee · The Lottsamford Family Charitable Foundation · The Bolling Charitable Foundation · The David J Cooper Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Nan H Altmayer Charitable Trust Regions Bank Trustee · As Mitchell Foundation Inc · The Ben May Charitable Trust Hancock Whitney Bank Successor Trustee
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Doy & Margaret McCall Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.