Skip to content

· Private foundation

Douglass Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2021
73
Grants FY2021
14
States reached
$6k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Douglass Family Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Douglass Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 54 organizations, $60k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

40
’17
48
’18
47
’19
41
’20
54
’21
0
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Philanthropy$1.2MHealth$50kEnvironment$42kInternational$35kHuman Services$22kArts & Culture$16kYouth Development$14kAnimals$12kOther$0
02FY2021 · 73 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
14
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER$6,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$6,000
KENSINGTON CONSERVATORY$3,000
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS$2,700
HARRY AND EVA PUKSTA FOUNDATION$2,500
DAV CHARITABLE SERVICE TRUST$2,000
CVNM$2,000
ENNEAGRAM PRISON PROJECT$1,600
350ORG$1,500
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$1,300
KENT DENVER SCHOOL$1,000
PROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING$1,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$1,000
CHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATRE$1,000
FRIENDS OF THE PARKS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ATTENTION HOMES: $550 → 12%ATTENTION HOMES: $500 → 12%ATTENTION HOMES: $500 → 12%ATTENTION HOMES: $500 → 12%ATTENTION HOMES: $500 → 12%LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $600 → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $1k → 12%LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $600 → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $750 → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $750 → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $500 → 12%LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $500 → 12%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $300 → 12%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $200 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
KY
MD
NM
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$248k · 76 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

76 repeat relationships: 59 still active in FY2021, 17 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

76
8

Total granted

$248k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+21%

Still filing today

62%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EnvironmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
    5× · 2017–2021 · $35k · revenue +27%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $28k · revenue +98%
  • FO
    Friends of Central Algoma Land Trust
    5× · 2017–2021 · $14k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • FN
    FORTERRA NW
    one grant, 2019 · $500 · revenue -18%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +21%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
2
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
3
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
4
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
5
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
6
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—
7
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
8
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
9
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
10
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
11
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
12
Greater Yellowstone Coalition

Greater yellowstone coalition works with all people to protect the lands, waters, and wildlife of the greater yellowstone ecosystem, now and for future generations.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is Harry L and Eva J Puksta Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
65/68
Grantees still filing
56/68
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $692,934 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $230,978 · PhilanthropySANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+3 more: $9,200 · PhilanthropyFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $230,978 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMEN…FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $34,900 · OtherFRED HUTCHIN…DAV CHARITABLE SERVICE TRUST: $10,000 · OtherDAV CHARITAB…+69 more: $106,900 · Other+69 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $27,500 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $6,400 · InternationalREBUILD AFRICA INC: $2,350 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,600 · International+2 more: $1,200 · InternationalFriends of Central Algoma Land Trust: $13,500 · Environment350ORG: $8,500 · EnvironmentALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE: $3,500 · EnvironmentNEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $3,100 · EnvironmentADVENTURERS AND SCIENTISTS FOR CONSERVATION: $2,750 · Environment+4 more: $2,800 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE PARKS: $6,500 · Recreation & SportsBIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY: $2,500 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $250 · Recreation & SportsPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $2,500 · HealthPROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC: $2,500 · HealthMental Health Center of Denver: $1,950 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $1,800 · HealthCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $1,800 · HealthNEW MEXICO SUICIDE INTERVENTION PROJECT INC: $1,200 · Health
Philanthropy$933,112Community Improvement$230,978Other$151,800International$39,050Environment$34,150Recreation & Sports$14,250Health$11,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $692,934 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $230,978 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $230,978 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $34,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $27,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Central Algoma Land Trust: $13,500 over 5y, 1.5% of budget350ORG: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PARKS: $6,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $6,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetENNEAGRAM PRISON PROJECT: $5,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCLIMATE SOLUTIONS: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST PLACE: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $4,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE: $3,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHERE WITH CARE: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC: $2,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetADVENTURERS AND SCIENTISTS FOR CONSERVATION: $2,750 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetATTENTION INC: $2,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKITCHEN ANGELS INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHARRY L AND EVA J PUKSTA FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetREBUILD AFRICA INC: $2,350 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM: $2,300 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $2,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLANDMARKS PRESERVATION COUNCIL OF ILLINOIS: $2,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAIRY CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMental Health Center of Denver: $1,950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $1,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $1,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY: $1,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $1,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNathan Yip Foundation: $1,700 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $1,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEM Santa Fe: $1,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE EARTH CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC: $1,300 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCONTIGO IMMIGRANT JUSTICE: $1,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO SUICIDE INTERVENTION PROJECT INC: $1,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE OUR YOUTH INC: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIVE LIKE JAKE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Central Algoma Land Trust ↗
  • Who funds 350ORG ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE PARKS ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ENNEAGRAM PRISON PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds BIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS ↗
  • Who funds FIRST PLACE ↗
  • Who funds KENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THERE WITH CARE ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVENTURERS AND SCIENTISTS FOR CONSERVATION ↗
  • Who funds ATTENTION INC ↗
  • Who funds KITCHEN ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds HARRY L AND EVA J PUKSTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REBUILD AFRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COUNCIL OF ILLINOIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM35× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · The Frost Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · The Ark Foundation · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Livingry Foundation · St Vincent Hospital · Anchorum St Vincent · Brindle Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Douglass Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Douglass Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Douglass Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Douglass Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Douglass Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph