How much did DOUGLAS O & GAIL S TOZOUR FOUNDATION grant in FY2021?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 86% of DOUGLAS O & GAIL S TOZOUR FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

education trainingtraining studentsstudents adultsfonchildhoodmedical researchcancer

2019

medicalartsresearchprogress educationchildren

2020

lowcountryboys girlsreliefprogress educationculture arts

2021

athletic

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2021 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

Under $10k21 grants · $22k
$10k–50k3 grants · $36k
$50k–250k2 grants · $160k
$250k+1 grant · $1.9M

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND$1,913,283
WEXFORD PLANTATION CHARITY FD$100,000
US NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION$60,000
NATIONAL LIBERTY MUSEUM$16,000
CRISTO REY PHILA HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
SATELL INSTITUTE$10,000
EQUESTRIAN TEAM BOOSTER CLUB$5,000
COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON$4,250
YOUNG LIFE$2,600
ST FRANCIS BY THE SEA$1,750
UPPER MERION AREA COMMUNITY CUPBOARD$1,650
CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF CHARLESTON$1,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$1,000
CB COMMUNITY SCHOOL$1,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$990

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 10%. 22% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$587k · 37 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

37 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2021, 23 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$587k

$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%

+32%

Still filing today

24%

31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PHILABUNDANCE
3× · 2018–2021 · $26k · revenue +35%
YL
YOUNG LIFE
5× · 2017–2021 · $12k · revenue +26%
AC
ARTS CENTER OF COASTAL CAROLINA
3× · 2017–2019 · $8k · revenue +19%

Funded once

NL
NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE
one grant, 2017 · $50k
DU
DENISON UNIVERSITY
one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +4%
UF
USNA FOUNDATION
one grant, 2018 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Philadelphia University

To improve lives and provide students with exceptional value in 21st century professional education.

Education

Susquehanna University

Susquehanna university educates students for productive, creative and reflective lives of achievement, leadership, and service in a diverse, dynamic and interdependent world.

Education

Upmc

Support of subsidiary tax-exempt healthcare, education and research organizations

Health

William Penn University

William penn university provides the opportunity for an educational experience with a focus on leadership, technology, and the quaker principles of simplicity, peace-making, intergrity, community and equality.

Education

University of Delaware

Instruction, research, and public services are the university's most significant activities.

—

The Philadelphia Award

—

Bluffton University

The university seeks to prepare students of all backgrounds for life and vocation, responsible citizenship, service to all people and for the purposes of god's kingdom.

Education

The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health

Upmc Somerset

Upmc somerset is a not-for-profit community asset committed: to providing care to the sick and injured, preserving and sustaining life, and promoting health and well being; to the promotion and development of complementary programs and…

Health

Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art is committed to being the cultural heart of philadelphia. (sch o)pma is a national and international destination for art, but first and foremost we are philadelphia's museum for all the many diverse…

Arts & Culture

University of Pittsburgh

To provide high quality educational services, research, and community service.

Education

East Carolina University Medical &

The foundation exists for the purposes of supporting and promoting the educational and charitable purposes and the lawful activities of the ecu health sciences campus.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Free Library of Philadelphia Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Unbound. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/45

the rest of the field

14%

14,580/102,999

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

40 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

39/40

Grantees still filing

28/40

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,329,876Arts & Culture$236,871Education$86,150Food & Nutrition$25,750Philanthropy$13,000Youth Development$12,200Human Services$5,268

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA23.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Connelly Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Edward a Bond Foundation · Heritage Classic Foundation · Community Foundation of the Lowcountry · The Cigna Group Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation DOUGLAS O & GAIL S TOZOUR FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

6get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PHILADELPHIA KIDS IN CARE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~45 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 49.5× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 465264093 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on PHILADELPHIA KIDS IN CARE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 45 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 13% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Douglas O & Gail S Tozour Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Douglas O & Gail S Tozour Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

DOUGLAS O & GAIL S TOZOUR FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

40 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Douglas O & Gail S Tozour Foundation?

More from the funding graph

DOUGLAS O & GAIL S TOZOUR FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

40 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Douglas O & Gail S Tozour Foundation?

More from the funding graph