Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Douglas and Erika Cramer Private Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$116kPhilanthropy$25kHealth$10kReligion$8kEmployment$6kRecreation & Sports$5kHuman Services$3kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,030
Median grant
6
States reached
$381k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHIEF$3,286
NSHMBA FOUNDATION$3,250
WVU FOUNDATION$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,030
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY$1,000
NEW UTRECHT HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
CEDARS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $750) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF WAYNE COUNTY: $500 → 11%INTEGRATED COMMUNITY SERVICES: $250 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
NE
WV
DE
DC
LA
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$117k · 13 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
37

Total granted

$117k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+15%

Still filing today

54%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationAnimalsArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2024 · $41k · revenue +45%
  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $9k · revenue +5%
  • AT
    ACHIEVE TAHOE
    3× · 2018–2020 · $5k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • GS
    GOLDMAN SACHS PHILANTHROPY FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $19k
  • TB
    THE BRIGHTON SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
3
Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative, inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment
4
Disability Rights Washington

Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.

Human Services
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

6
The Bar Association of San Francisco

The bar association of san francisco champions equal access to justice and promotes humanity, excellence, and diversity in the legal profession. we provide legal services to disadvantaged and underserved individuals in san francisco. we…

7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

8
Achieve Now

Achieve now is a philadelphia-based social justice organization that sees literacy as a mechanism to effect social change. our mission is to provide k-2 school children in greater philadelphia with high-quality, culturally competent…

Education
9
Abilitypath Housing

Abilitypath housing advances affordable, accessible housing projects that promote independence and inclusive communities for adults with developmental disabilities. through partnerships and innovative program designs, abilitypath housing…

Human Services
10
Upwardly Global

Upwardly global removes employment barriers for immigrant, refugee, and asylee professionals while advancing the inclusion of their skills into the u.s. economy.

Employment
11
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such…

12
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia University Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rise Up Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-8 SchoolsPublic University Foundatio…Developmental Disabilities …Legal Aid & Immigration Ser…Fallen First Responder Supp…Land Conservation Organizat…Animal Rescue and AdoptionYouth Sports Booster Organi…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%33%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%7%20–35yr13%2%35–55yr16%79%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,538

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
14/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GOLDMAN SACHS PHILANTHROPY FUND — $19,250 · OtherGOLDMAN SACHS PHILANTHROPY FUNDTHE BRIGHTON SCHOOL — $10,000 · OtherTHE BRIGHTON SCHOOLPROSPANICA — $6,000 · OtherPROSPANICAREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF — $5,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OFSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY INCLUSIVE U — $5,000 · OtherSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY INCLUSIVE UABRAHAM LINCOLN SCHOOL — $5,000 · OtherABRAHAM LINCOLN SCHOOLACHIEVE TAHOE — $4,550 · OtherTRIPS FOR KIDS NATIONAL — $4,000 · OtherCHIEF — $3,286 · OtherST RITAS CHURCH — $3,100 · Other+27 more — $26,303 · Other+27 moreSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $41,000 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITYTHE TRUSTEES OF THE CUSHING ACADEMY — $35,500 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF THE CUSHING ACADEMYWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $9,030 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC+3 more — $1,950 · EducationAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $5,000 · HealthAUTISTRY STUDIOS INCORPORATED — $1,000 · HealthTHE BATTERY FOUNDATION — $4,000 · PhilanthropyTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $750 · AnimalsJessica's Haven and Rescue — $250 · AnimalsHELPING HOUNDS DOG RESCUE INC — $250 · AnimalsRepresentUs — $1,000 · Public BenefitTHE REENTRY INITIATIVE — $1,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$91,489Education$87,480Health$6,000Philanthropy$4,000Animals$1,250Public Benefit$1,000Crime & Legal$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $41,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE CUSHING ACADEMY — $35,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $9,030 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPROSPANICA — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACHIEVE TAHOE — $4,550 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BATTERY FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRIPS FOR KIDS NATIONAL — $4,000 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetLawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRepresentUs — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISTRY STUDIOS INCORPORATED — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE REENTRY INITIATIVE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPACE UNIVERSITY — $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFDNY FOUNDATION INC — $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBroadway Dreams Foundation Corporation — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CONTEMPORARY ENSEMBLE FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTEGRATED COMMUNITY SERVICES — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJessica's Haven and Rescue — $250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HOUNDS DOG RESCUE INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRISE UP FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA10.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Douglas and Erika Cramer Private Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Douglas and Erika Cramer Private Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Douglas and Erika Cramer Private Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph