Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dorothy M and E Milton Kleven Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$146k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$648kReligion$218kFood & Nutrition$145kHuman Services$105kHousing & Shelter$44kArts & Culture$15kHealth$14kInternational$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $92k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST OLAF COLLEGE$30,000
AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY$25,000
NORMANDALE LUTHERAN CHURCH$16,500
PEOPLE REACHING OUT TO OTHER PEOPLE$10,000
INTERFAITH OUTREACH & COMMUNITY PARTNERS$10,000
JOSIAH VENTURE$7,000
MARIE SANDVIK CENTER INC$5,500
APPLE TREE DENTAL$5,000
TC HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
COMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE$5,000
NORWAY HOUSE$5,000
SHARING AND CARING HANDS$5,000
EVERY MEAL$5,000
METRO HOPE MINISTRIES$4,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $5k → 11%COMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE: $9k → 11%COMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE: $5k → 11%COMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE: $5k → 11%COMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 30 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +50% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
19

Total granted

$1.2M
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+50%

Still filing today

53%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthReligionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    ST OLAF COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $390k · revenue +56%
  • AU
    AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $250k · revenue +30%
  • PR
    PEOPLE REACHING OUT TO OTHER PEOPLE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $76k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • C
    CITYJOY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • MA
    MINNEHAHA ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +50%
  • LC
    LUTHER COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
2
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
3
Ecumen

We empower individuals and families to confidently navigate aging so that it is a purposeful journey filled with dignity and support.

—
4
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
5
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
6
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
7
Minnesota Council of Nonprofits Inc

The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.

Philanthropy
8
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
9
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—
10
Catholic Charities North Dakota

Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.

—
11
Minnesota Grocers Association

The minnesota grocers association advances the common interest of those engaged in all aspects of the food industry of mn as a leadership resource. the mga encourages and sponsors educational seminars, conventions and fosters the exchange…

—
12
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Outreach and Community Partners; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST OLAF COLLEGE: $390,000 · EducationST OLAF COLLEGEAUGSBURG UNIVERSITY: $250,400 · EducationAUGSBURG UNIVERSITY+2 more: $5,500 · EducationNORMANDALE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF EDINA: $117,216 · OtherNORMANDALE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH…INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $64,500 · OtherINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PART…TC HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $40,500 · OtherTC HABITAT FOR HUMANITYMARIE SANDVIK CENTER: $34,000 · OtherMARIE SANDVIK CENTERMETRO HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $33,000 · OtherMETRO HOPE MINISTRIES INCVEAP Inc: $27,200 · OtherVEAP IncIndividual grant recipient: $21,000 · Other+32 more: $81,650 · Other+32 morePEOPLE REACHING OUT TO OTHER PEOPLE INC: $76,000 · Food & NutritionPEOPLE RE…EVERY MEAL: $12,000 · Food & NutritionEVERY MEA…FOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE: $5,500 · Food & NutritionFOOD GROU…SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $5,000 · Food & NutritionJosiah Venture: $29,000 · ReligionCOMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE INC: $19,000 · Human ServicesSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesNorway House: $5,000 · Arts & CultureEDITHS HOUSE INC: $3,500 · Housing & Shelter
Education$645,900Other$419,066Food & Nutrition$98,500Religion$29,000Human Services$24,500Arts & Culture$5,000Housing & Shelter$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST OLAF COLLEGE: $390,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAUGSBURG UNIVERSITY: $250,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE REACHING OUT TO OTHER PEOPLE INC: $76,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $64,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMETRO HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $33,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetJosiah Venture: $29,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVEAP Inc: $27,200 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE INC: $19,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetEVERY MEAL: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAPPLE TREE DENTAL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA SYMPHONIC WINDS INC: $6,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetFOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEDITHS HOUSE INC: $3,500 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetMINNEHAHA ACADEMY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHER COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOCO'S HEART DOG RESCUE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA INDEPENDENCE COLLEGE AND COMMUNITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST OLAF COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE REACHING OUT TO OTHER PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds METRO HOPE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Josiah Venture ↗
  • Who funds VEAP Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERY MEAL ↗
  • Who funds APPLE TREE DENTAL ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA SYMPHONIC WINDS INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE ↗
  • Who funds SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Norway House ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds EDITHS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNEHAHA ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds LUTHER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds COCO'S HEART DOG RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN21.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Assurant Foundation · American Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dorothy M and E Milton Kleven Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dorothy M and E Milton Kleven Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dorothy M and E Milton Kleven Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph