Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dorothy D and Joseph a Moller Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$3.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$51MReligion$25MAnimals$8.4MArts & Culture$5.9MCrime & Legal$2.1MPublic Benefit$707kRecreation & Sports$295kHuman Services$264kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $151k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+4 grants · $9.6M
$84,600
Median grant
10
States reached
$185M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$2,998,600
DAYSTAR FOUNDATION AND LIBRARY INC$2,998,600
ASSOCIATION OF GRADUATES USAFA$2,998,600
390TH MEMORIAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC$592,200
ARIZONA CENTER FOR NATURE CONSERVATION$169,200
ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE & SPCA$169,200
ARIZONA HUMANE SOCIETY$169,200
HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA$169,200
MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER$84,600
INSTITUTE FOR HUMANE STUDIES$84,600
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION$84,600
THE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$84,600
WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION$84,600
NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC$84,600
SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC$56,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $174k → 15%DAYSTAR FOUNDATION AND LIBRARY INC: $3.1M → 16%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $3.1M → 14%ASSOCIATION OF GRADUATES USAFA: $3.1M → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $169k → 15%DAYSTAR FOUNDATION AND LIBRARY INC: $3.0M → 16%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $3.0M → 14%ASSOCIATION OF GRADUATES USAFA: $3.0M → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $162k → 15%DAYSTAR FOUNDATION AND LIBRARY INC: $2.9M → 16%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2.9M → 14%ASSOCIATION OF GRADUATES USAFA: $2.9M → 9%DAYSTAR FOUNDATION AND LIBRARY INC: $2.7M → 16%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2.7M → 14%ASSOCIATION OF GRADUATES USAFA: $2.7M → 9%DAYSTAR FOUNDATION AND LIBRARY INC: $2.7M → 16%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2.7M → 14%ASSOCIATION OF GRADUATES USAFA: $2.7M → 9%DAYSTAR FOUNDATION AND LIBRARY INC: $2.7M → 16%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2.7M → 14%ASSOCIATION OF GRADUATES USAFA: $2.7M → 9%DAYSTAR FOUNDATION AND LIBRARY INC: $2.7M → 16%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2.7M → 14%ASSOCIATION OF GRADUATES USAFA: $2.7M → 9%DAYSTAR FOUNDATION AND LIBRARY INC: $2.6M → 16%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2.6M → 14%ASSOCIATION OF GRADUATES USAFA: $2.6M → 9%390TH MEMORIAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $608k → 15%DAYSTAR FOUNDATION AND LIBRARY INC: $2.6M → 16%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2.6M → 14%ASSOCIATION OF GRADUATES USAFA: $2.6M → 9%ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE & SPCA: $174k → 11%390TH MEMORIAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $592k → 15%ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE & SPCA: $169k → 11%390TH MEMORIAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $567k → 15%ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE & SPCA: $162k → 11%390TH MEMORIAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $542k → 15%390TH MEMORIAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $542k → 15%390TH MEMORIAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $532k → 15%390TH MEMORIAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $529k → 15%390TH MEMORIAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $520k → 15%390TH MEMORIAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $517k → 15%ARIZONA HUMANE SOCIETY: $174k → 11%ARIZONA HUMANE SOCIETY: $169k → 11%ARIZONA HUMANE SOCIETY: $162k → 11%ARIZONA CENTER FOR NATURE CONSERVATION: $174k → 11%ARIZONA CENTER FOR NATURE CONSERVATION: $169k → 11%ARIZONA CENTER FOR NATURE CONSERVATION: $162k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
MA
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
SC
DC
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$69M · 27 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
1

Total granted

$69M
$32k

Still filing today

74%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsCrime & LegalArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • 3M
    390TH MEMORIAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.9M · revenue +4% · 65% of their budget
  • HS
    Humane Society of Southern Arizona
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +46%
  • TA
    THE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $32k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
2
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
3
Liberty Wildlife Inc

Liberty Wildlife nurtures the nature of Arizona by providing quality wildlife rehabilitation, environmental education and conservation consultation services for the community.

—
4
Humane Society of Utah

The humane society of utah is dedicated to the elimination of pain, fear, and suffering in all animals. in 2024, hsu provided over 13,000 affordable spay/neuter surgeries, administered 121,000 vaccinations, adopted 6,363 pets into loving…

Animals
5
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
6
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
7
The California Wildlife Center

The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…

Health
8
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
9
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
10
Nevada Humane Society

To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.

Animals
11
Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland

The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.

Animals
12
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arizona Humane Society; the most unlike its peers is Hill Top Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASSOCIATION OF GRADUATES USAFA: $25,057,450 · OtherASSOCIATION OF GRADUATES USAFADaystar Foundation and Library Inc: $25,057,450 · OtherDaystar Foundation and Library Inc+9 more: $1,743,449 · OtherHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $25,057,450 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGEHumane Society of Southern Arizona: $1,413,900 · AnimalsHumane Soc…THE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $1,413,900 · AnimalsTHE ARIZON…Arizona Humane Society: $1,413,900 · AnimalsArizona Hu…ARIZONA CENTER FOR NATURE CONSERVATION: $1,413,900 · AnimalsARIZONA CE…COMPANION ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY: $471,300 · AnimalsCOMPANION …INTERNATIONAL WOLF CENTER: $471,300 · AnimalsINTERNATIO…Dedication and Everlasting Love to Animals: $471,300 · AnimalsDedication…SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $471,300 · AnimalsSANTA FE A…WILD CANID SURVIVAL AND RESEARCH CENTER INC DBA ENDANGERED WOLF CENTER: $471,300 · AnimalsWILD CANID…INTERNATIONAL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE: $414,900 · Animals390TH MEMORIAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $4,948,650 · Arts & CultureMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $706,950 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $706,950 · Crime & LegalPacific Legal Foundation: $706,950 · Crime & LegalWASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION: $706,950 · Crime & LegalLeadership Institute: $545,850 · Public BenefitADVENTURE UNLIMITED: $294,563 · Recreation & SportsHILL TOP CENTER: $194,813 · Health
Other$51,858,349Education$25,057,450Animals$8,427,000Arts & Culture$5,655,600Crime & Legal$2,120,850Public Benefit$545,850Recreation & Sports$294,563Health$194,813

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDaystar Foundation and Library Inc: $25,057,450 over 9y, 88% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $25,057,450 over 9y, 1.3% of budget390TH MEMORIAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $4,948,650 over 9y, 65% of budgetHumane Society of Southern Arizona: $1,413,900 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetTHE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $1,413,900 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetArizona Humane Society: $1,413,900 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetARIZONA CENTER FOR NATURE CONSERVATION: $1,413,900 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $706,950 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation: $706,950 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetInstitute for Humane Studies: $706,950 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetWASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION: $706,950 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $706,950 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetLeadership Institute: $545,850 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCOMPANION ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY: $471,300 over 9y, 16% of budgetINTERNATIONAL WOLF CENTER: $471,300 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetDedication and Everlasting Love to Animals: $471,300 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetSANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $471,300 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetWILD CANID SURVIVAL AND RESEARCH CENTER INC DBA ENDANGERED WOLF CENTER: $471,300 over 9y, 4.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE: $414,900 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetADVENTURE UNLIMITED: $294,563 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetDESERT VIEW: $263,063 over 8y, 12% of budgetHILL TOP CENTER: $194,813 over 6y, 6.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Daystar Foundation and Library Inc ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds 390TH MEMORIAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Southern Arizona ↗
  • Who funds THE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA CENTER FOR NATURE CONSERVATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Institute for Humane Studies ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds COMPANION ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL WOLF CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Dedication and Everlasting Love to Animals ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds WILD CANID SURVIVAL AND RESEARCH CENTER INC DBA ENDANGERED WOLF CENTER ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds ADVENTURE UNLIMITED ↗
  • Who funds DESERT VIEW ↗
  • Who funds HILL TOP CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY13.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Shell USA Company Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dorothy D and Joseph a Moller Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dorothy D and Joseph a Moller Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dorothy D and Joseph a Moller Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Dorothy D and Joseph a Moller Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dorothy D and Joseph a Moller’s filings →

    More from the funding graph