Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Donald Weesner Charitable Tr Ua

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$307k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Environment$1.3MAnimals$1.1MArts & Culture$898kHealth$512kRecreation & Sports$85kSocial Science$65kYouth Development$31kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $222k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREAT RIVER GREENING$61,000
WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER$60,000
WOLF RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER$51,000
THOMAS IRVINE DODGE NATURE CENTER$50,000
TWIN CITIES PBS$35,000
TRUE FRIENDS$25,000
GREAT LAKES AQUARIUM$20,000
LAKE SUPERIOR ZOO$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 83% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THOMAS IRVINE DODGE NATURE CENTER: $50k → 6%WOLF RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL: $190k → 8%MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ART: $37k → 11%SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA: $74k → 14%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $74k → 7%THOMAS IRVINE DODGE FOUNDATION: $50k → 6%WOLF RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL --: $142k → 8%SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA: $66k → 14%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $66k → 7%THOMAS IRVINE DODGE NATURE: $39k → 6%WOLF RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENT: $135k → 8%SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA: $64k → 14%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $66k → 7%WOLF RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL: $130k → 8%SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA: $59k → 14%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $64k → 7%WOLF RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER: $127k → 8%SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINN: $52k → 14%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $61k → 7%WOLF RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL: $80k → 8%SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINN: $66k → 14%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $59k → 7%WOLF RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL: $59k → 8%SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINN: $61k → 14%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $52k → 7%MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION: $74k → 6%WOLF RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER: $51k → 8%COURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION: $96k → 11%MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION: $71k → 6%COURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION: $87k → 11%MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION: $66k → 6%COURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION: $74k → 11%MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION: $64k → 6%COURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION: $66k → 11%MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION: $61k → 6%COURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION: $66k → 11%MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION: $59k → 6%COURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION: $64k → 11%MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION: $52k → 6%COURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION: $59k → 11%GREAT RIVER GREENING: $61k → 14%GREAT RIVER GREENING: $50k → 14%WILDLIFE REHAB CENTER OF MN: $146k → 14%WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER: $100k → 14%WIDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER: $84k → 14%WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER: $60k → 14%WIDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER: $50k → 14%WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER: $39k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.0M · 28 repeat orgs$328k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
14

Total granted

$4.0M
$328k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+100%

Still filing today

57%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEnvironmentArts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MZ
    MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $448k · revenue +158%
  • WR
    WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA
    7× · 2017–2024 · $394k · revenue +133%
  • WR
    WOLF RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER
    3× · 2019–2024 · $313k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • WR
    WILDLIFE REHAB CENTER OF MN
    one grant, 2022 · $146k
  • T
    TPT
    one grant, 2022 · $35k
  • EI
    EAGLEWATCH INC
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of Schlitz Audubon Nature Center Inc

Schlitz audubon nature center conserves our land's diverse habitats on lake michigan and provides meaningful experiences and environmental education for all.

Environment
2
Huron Pines Resource Conservation & Development Council Inc

It is our mission at huron pines to conserve and enhance northern michigan's natural resources to ensure healthy water, protected places and vibrant communities. for alomst 50 years, our work across the forests, lakes and streams of…

Environment
3
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
4
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
5
Kalamazoo Nature Center

Create relationships & experiences that welcome and inspire people to discover, enjoy, value, and care for nature. Kalamazoo Nature Center envisions a resilient community where all people have strong interconnections with the natural world.

Environment
6
Swan Valley Connections

Maintain the swan valley's unique natural resources and ensure that a vibrant human community can sustain itself through stewardship, education, economic viability, and conservation on public and private lands.

Environment
7
Wild Rivers Conservancy of the St Croix & Namekagon

The mission of wild rivers conservancy of the st. croix & namekagon is to inspire stewardship to forever ensure the rare ecological integrity of the st. croix and namekagon riverway. the conservancy of the st. croix and namekagon works…

Environment
8
Conservation Minnesota

Conservation minnesota's mission is to turn our shared conservation values into state priorities and provide you with the information you need to make decisions for your family, community and future.

Environment
9
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
10
International Wolf Center

The international wolf center uses science-based education to teach and inspire the world about wolves, their ecology, and the wolf-human relationship.

Animals
11
Hawk Mountain Sanctuary Association

Hawk mountain sanctuary association's mission is to conserve birds of prey worldwide by providing leadership in raptor conservation science and education, and by maintaining hawk mountain sanctuary as a model observation, research, and…

Animals
12
North Dakota Natural Resources Trust

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minnesota Zoo Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Boys Girls Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 50 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr18%33%20–35yr14%24%35–55yr14%43%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr18%24%20–35yr14%32%35–55yr14%44%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
13%
2,500/19,566

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $601,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION — $512,265 · OtherCOURAGE KENNY FOUNDATIONTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $442,933 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYSCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINN — $179,598 · OtherSCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNWILDLIFE REHAB CENTER OF MN — $146,000 · OtherWILDLIFE REHAB CENTER OF MNTHOMAS IRVINE DODGE NATURE CENTER — $119,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $104,151 · Other+18 more — $448,770 · Other+18 moreMINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION — $447,933 · AnimalsMINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATIONWILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA — $394,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE REHABILITATION C…GREAT RIVER GREENING — $176,000 · AnimalsGREAT RIVER GREENING+4 more — $76,000 · Animals+4 moreSCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA — $263,335 · Arts & CultureSCIENCE MUSEUM …MINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION — $157,751 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA ORCHE…MINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS — $157,751 · Arts & CultureMINNEAPOLIS SOC…TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC — $70,000 · Arts & CultureTWIN CITIES PUB…WOLF RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER — $313,000 · EnvironmentWOLF RIDG…LAKE SUPERIOR CENTER — $35,500 · EnvironmentLAKE SUPE…HARTLEY NATURE CENTER — $32,000 · EnvironmentHARTLEY N…+2 more — $15,000 · EnvironmentTRUE FRIENDS — $85,000 · Recreation & SportsCLIMATE GENERATION — $35,000 · Education
Other$2,553,717Animals$1,093,933Arts & Culture$648,837Environment$395,500Recreation & Sports$85,000Education$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION — $512,265 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetMINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION — $447,933 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $442,933 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA — $394,000 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetWOLF RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER — $313,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetSCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA — $263,335 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGREAT RIVER GREENING — $176,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetMINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION — $157,751 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS — $157,751 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHOMAS IRVINE DODGE NATURE CENTER — $119,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetTRUE FRIENDS — $85,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC — $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLAKE SUPERIOR CENTER — $35,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCLIMATE GENERATION — $35,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetHARTLEY NATURE CENTER — $32,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetEAGLEWATCH INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCOMO FRIENDS — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetARROWHEAD ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $19,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHAWK RIDGE BIRD OBSERVATORY INC — $12,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PRAIRIE WETLANDS LEA — $10,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetMINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA
  • Who funds WOLF RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER
  • Who funds SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA
  • Who funds GREAT RIVER GREENING
  • Who funds MINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS
  • Who funds THOMAS IRVINE DODGE NATURE CENTER
  • Who funds TRUE FRIENDS
  • Who funds TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC
  • Who funds LAKE SUPERIOR CENTER
  • Who funds CLIMATE GENERATION
  • Who funds HARTLEY NATURE CENTER
  • Who funds EAGLEWATCH INC
  • Who funds BELWIN CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds COMO FRIENDS
  • Who funds ARROWHEAD ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds HAWK RIDGE BIRD OBSERVATORY INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE PRAIRIE WETLANDS LEA
  • Who funds BOYS GIRLS CLUB
  • Who funds MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL27.9× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Longview Foundation · Lloyd K Johnson Foundation · Hugh J Andersen Foundation · Minnesota Power Foundation · Hardenbergh Foundation · The K Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Donald Weesner Charitable Tr Ua funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph