Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Donald W & Margaret M Anderson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of DONALD W & MARGARET M ANDERSON FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $490k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $678k
$20,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAUI YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES$125,000
AGRACE HOSPICECARE FOUNDATION$120,000
HOLOMAU GROUP$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STOUT FOUNDATION - DEPT OF MULTI-CULTURAL STUDENT$80,000
MAYO CLINIC$75,000
INTERFAITH OUTREACH & COMMUNITY PARTNERS$75,000
INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN INDIAN ART$52,800
OPERATION FRESH START$50,000
MAUI MEDIC HEALERS HUI$40,000
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION$40,000
DANE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$40,000
WAYZATA COMMUNITY CHURCH$30,000
MSU MANKATO FOUNDATION$25,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$25,000
LITTLE EAGLE ARTS FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $220k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE ACCOMPLIS COLLECTIVE: $20k → 17%THE LIVING PONO PROJECT: $30k → 9%MAI MOVEMENT HAWAII INC: $25k → 9%THE LIVING PONO PROJECT: $25k → 9%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $20k → 10%IRWIN A AND ROBERT D GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $15k → 10%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $15k → 10%FAITH'S LODGE: $25k → 11%FAITH'S LODGE: $5k → 11%VILLAGE DIAPER BANK: $25k → 10%FAITH'S LODGE: $5k → 11%FAITH'S LODGE: $5k → 11%CHILD LOSS FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
OH
CA
VA
NM
HI

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 89% of Donald W & Margaret M Anderson Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 27% of the giving stays in MN; read by stated purpose it is 4% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Donald W & Margaret M Anderson Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.9M · 53 repeat orgs$842k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

53 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
24

Total granted

$4.9M
$530k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+12%

Still filing today

53%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $313k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationEnvironmentHealthCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IO
    INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $376k · revenue +26%
  • BI
    BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $243k · revenue +35%
  • OF
    OPERATION FRESH START INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $205k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • SC
    SONOMA COUNTY VET CONNECT
    one grant, 2020 · $80k · revenue -53%
  • MB
    MOON BEAR WILDLIFE SANCTUARY
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY DELVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -25%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Land Trust

The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.

Environment
2
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
3
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
4
Habitat for Humanity of Minnesota Inc

Habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, community, and hope. through advocacy, collaboration, and leadership, hfh-mn advances the work of minnesota's habitat for humanity affiliates to create and preserve affordable…

—
5
Neighborhood Housing Services of Duluth One Roof Lending

To provide financing that will help people of lower income find, purchase, and fix their homes, for both single family homes as well as rental housing situations.

Community Improvement
6
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
7
Door County Land Trust Inc

The door county land trust is a local, non-governmental non-profit organization whose mission is to preserve door county's exceptional lands and waters forever.

Environment
8
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
9
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
10
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
11
Gathering Waters Inc

Gathering waters (wisconsin's alliance for land trusts) strengthens land trusts to protect wisconsin's special places and grow healthy, vibrant communities. the stronger the alliance between gathering waters' staff and board members, land…

Environment
12
Avivo

Avivo increases well-being through recovery and career advancement while working to end homelessness.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Outreach and Community Partners and the most unlike its peers is John Burch Park Supporters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Animal Rescue and ShelterOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Equine Therapy ProgramsYouth Sports ProgramsYouth Development CentersEnvironmental Conservation …Food Banks and PantriesUnited Way AffiliatesMilitary Veterans SupportDomestic Violence Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%35%35–55yr16%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%10%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%18%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/63
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,502

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
57/58
Grantees still filing
38/58
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION - UW INITIATIVE TO END ALZHEIMERS — $570,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION - UW INITIATIVE TO END ALZHEIMERSINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS — $376,000 · OtherINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERSHOLOMUA GROUP — $305,000 · OtherHOLOMUA GROUPINSTITUTE OF AMERICAN INDIAN ART — $202,800 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STOUT FOUNDATION - DEPT OF MULTI-CULTURAL STUDENT — $185,000 · OtherMAUI MEDIC HEALERS HUI — $140,000 · OtherDANE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $140,000 · Other+65 more — $2,164,313 · Other+65 moreAgrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc — $445,000 · HealthAgrace HospiceC…MAYO CLINIC — $225,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICTHE GRIEF CLUB OF MINNESOTA — $153,000 · HealthTHE GRIEF CLUB …+1 more — $15,000 · HealthBEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE — $243,000 · Community ImprovementLOKAHI PACIFIC — $55,000 · Community ImprovementNATIVE MOVEMENT — $20,000 · Community ImprovementSONOMA COUNTY VET CONNECT — $80,000 · Human ServicesLiving Pono Project — $55,000 · Human ServicesCHILD LOSS FOUNDATION — $45,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC — $35,000 · Human ServicesMAI MOVEMENT HAWAII INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE VILLAGE DIAPER BANK INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE ACCOMPLIS COLLECTIVE INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesIRWIN A AND ROBERT D GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesGROVES ACADEMY — $128,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $40,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION — $35,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $15,000 · EducationHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $200,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN INC — $15,000 · PhilanthropyOPERATION FRESH START INC — $205,000 · Employment
Other$4,083,113Health$838,000Community Improvement$318,000Human Services$300,000Education$218,000Philanthropy$215,000Employment$205,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAgrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc — $445,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS — $376,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetBEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE — $243,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $225,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION FRESH START INC — $205,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GRIEF CLUB OF MINNESOTA — $153,000 over 5y, 9.0% of budgetDANE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $140,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetGROVES ACADEMY — $128,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMAUI YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $125,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI — $125,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE EAGLE ARTS FOUNDATION — $119,500 over 6y, 31% of budgetINSTITUTE OF AMERICAN INDIAN ARTS FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $56,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLOKAHI PACIFIC — $55,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetLiving Pono Project — $55,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetKA HALE A KE OLA HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTERS INC — $55,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWOMEN HELPING WOMEN — $50,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY INC — $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD LOSS FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSISSIPPI VALLEY CONSERVANCY INC — $39,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPASSAGES A PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT — $37,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSACRED YOUTH FOUNDATION — $29,500 over 2y, 18% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY MAUI INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMAI MOVEMENT HAWAII INC — $25,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetTHE VILLAGE DIAPER BANK INC — $25,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOregon Area Food Pantry — $25,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLAT BROKE FARM ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetNATIVE MOVEMENT — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ACCOMPLIS COLLECTIVE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US — $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHASTINGS HOCKEY BOOSTERS INC — $16,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetIRWIN A AND ROBERT D GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN WOMEN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT HOME INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PRAIRIE ENTHUSIASTs INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetORONO HOCKEY BOOSTERS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Agrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION FRESH START INC ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GRIEF CLUB OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds DANE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GROVES ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds MAUI YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE EAGLE ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN INDIAN ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SONOMA COUNTY VET CONNECT ↗
  • Who funds TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds LOKAHI PACIFIC ↗
  • Who funds Living Pono Project ↗
  • Who funds KA HALE A KE OLA HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY DELVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN HELPING WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD LOSS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alliant Energy Founda…Green Bay Packers Fou…Hooper Corp FoundationMadison Gas and Elect…Otto Bremer TrustTrustage Foundation I…Ch Robinson Worldwide…Madison Community Fou…Xcel Energy FoundationHerbert H Kohl Charit…Jpc FoundationVeridian Foundation I…
Alliant Energy Foundation IncWI30.4× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Hooper Corp Foundation · Madison Gas and Electric Foundation Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Trustage Foundation Inc · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Madison Community Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Jpc Foundation · Veridian Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Donald W & Margaret M Anderson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines