Skip to content

· Private foundation

Donald L & Valerie D Gottschalk Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$21kPublic Benefit$6kPhilanthropy$3kEducation$2kHuman Services$900Community Improvement$800Health$700Animals$650Other$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
11
States reached
$94k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRIST THE KING LUTHERAN CHURCH$5,200
TURNING POINT USA$500
JUDICAL WATCH$500
INSTITUTIONAL MINISTRIES$500
GREATER DELAFIELD COMMUNITY FUND$500
THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES$500
SOAR$300
Individual grant recipient$250
WORLD VISION$200
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION$100
COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE$100
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$100
ED CHOICE$100
CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA$100
AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $200) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%MILWAUKEE CATHOLIC HOME: $100 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
MA
IN
PA
RI
CA
NE
VA
AZ
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$35k · 22 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
28

Total granted

$35k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+41%

Still filing today

68%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Public BenefitHealthPhilanthropyCivil RightsArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3k · revenue +16%
  • GD
    GREATER DELAFIELD COMMUNITY FUND INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3k · revenue +58%
  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • TM
    THE MOLDOVA MISSION CO BRIDGE CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $200
  • JV
    JORDAN VOGEL MEMORIAL FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $200
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $150
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
8
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
9
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
10
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
11
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
12
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
23/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRIST THE KING LUTHERAN CHURCH: $19,220 · OtherCHRIST THE KING LUTHERAN CHURCHTURNING POINT USA INC: $1,600 · OtherSOAR: $1,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,250 · Other+43 more: $8,200 · Other+43 moreJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $2,500 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL W…Leadership Institute: $500 · Public BenefitLeadership…FOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY INC: $400 · Public BenefitFOUNDATION…+2 more: $200 · Public Benefit+2 moreGREATER DELAFIELD COMMUNITY FUND INC: $2,500 · PhilanthropyCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER: $500 · PhilanthropyHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $500 · EducationEdChoice Inc: $100 · EducationSTATE POLICY NETWORK: $400 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $100 · Civil RightsMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $400 · Arts & CultureTHE DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION: $100 · Arts & CultureST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $400 · Housing & Shelter
Other$31,570Public Benefit$3,600Philanthropy$3,000Education$600Civil Rights$500Arts & Culture$500Housing & Shelter$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER DELAFIELD COMMUNITY FUND INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $1,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER: $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE POLICY NETWORK: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY INC: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWAUKESHA COUNTY LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPAY LEE INC: $200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE CATHOLIC HOME INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROHEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTOP SOLDIER SUICIDE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEdChoice Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE CAPE COD INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER DELAFIELD COMMUNITY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds STATE POLICY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds WAUKESHA COUNTY LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds SPAY LEE INC ↗
  • Who funds PATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Donald L & Valerie D Gottschalk Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Donald L & Valerie D Gottschalk Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Association to Preserve Cape Cod Inc: 100% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Donald L & Valerie D Gottschalk’s filings →

More from the funding graph