Skip to content

· Private foundation

Donald and Ruth V Malvern Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2022
30
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

International$52kReligion$15kHealth$15kPhilanthropy$12kArts & Culture$8kHuman Services$4kEducation$3kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2022 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k29 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$150
Median grant
3
States reached
$135k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WINGS OF HOPE$13,000
ST ANDREWS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$3,000
MANCHESTER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$2,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ST LOUIS$2,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
LANDMARKS ASSOCIATION$1,000
ST MARKS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$1,000
GATEWAY CHAPTER-NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$1,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$500
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$500
FRIENDS OF TOWER GROVE$250
ST LOUIS ART MUSEUM$200
THE SANFORD MCDONNELL CENTER FOR CHARACTERPLUS$150
BACKSTAGERS$150
FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT HOUSE IN EBSWORTH PARK$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST MARKS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $2k → 11%SALVATION ARMY: $2k → 21%ST MARK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $1k → 11%LANDMARKS ASSOCIATION: $2k → 21%ST MARKS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $1k → 11%LANDMARKS ASSOCIATION: $1k → 21%BACKSTAGERS: $300 → 11%ST LOUIS ART MUSEUM: $200 → 21%BACKSTAGERS: $150 → 11%ST LOUIS ART MUSEUM: $200 → 21%BACKSTAGERS: $150 → 11%ST LOUIS ART MUSEUM: $200 → 21%ST LOUIS ART MUSEUM: $200 → 21%SALVATION ARMY: $1k → 21%RETINA RESEARCH & DEVELPMENT FOUNDATION: $200 → 11%LANDMARKS ASSOCIATION: $1k → 21%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ST LOUIS: $2k → 21%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ST LOUIS: $2k → 21%FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT HOUSE IN EBSWORTH PARK: $150 → 11%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ST LOUIS: $2k → 21%GATEWAY CHAPTER-NATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $2k → 11%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ST LOUIS: $2k → 21%GATEWAY CHAPTER-NATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $1k → 11%GATEWAY CHAPTER-NATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $1k → 21%KETC-CHANNEL 9: $150 → 21%KETC-CHANNEL 9: $150 → 21%FRIENDS OF TOWER GROVE: $250 → 21%WINGS OF HOPE: $13k → 11%WINGS OF HOPE: $13k → 11%FRIENDS OF TOWER GROVE: $250 → 21%WINGS OF HOPE: $13k → 11%WINGS OF HOPE: $13k → 11%FRIENDS OF TOWER GROVE: $250 → 21%MANCHESTER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $4k → 11%MANCHESTER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $4k → 11%FRIENDS OF TOWER GROVE: $250 → 21%MANCHESTER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $3k → 11%MANCHESTER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $625 → 11%ST ANDREWS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%ST LOUIS SYMPHONY: $300 → 21%ST ANDREWS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%THE SANFORD MCDONNELL CENTER FOR CHARACTERPLUS: $300 → 11%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $500 → 21%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $500 → 21%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $500 → 21%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $500 → 21%ST ANDREWS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%ST ANDREWS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$110k · 30 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
4

Total granted

$110k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+32%

Still filing today

40%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $650 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
Arts & CultureEnvironmentInternationalPhilanthropyEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2019–2022 · $2k · revenue +44%
  • SL
    SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
    3× · 2019–2022 · $600 · revenue +40%
  • FP
    Forest Park Forever Inc
    4× · 2019–2022 · $400 · revenue +108%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MARK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • YF
    YOSEMITE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100 · revenue +32%
  • SL
    ST LOUIS COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2019 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
3
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
4
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
5
Missouri State Medical Association

Msma's mission is to serve its members through promotion of the science & art of medicine, protection of the health of the public & betterment of the medical profession in missouri.

—
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
8
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
9
Materials Research Society

The materials research society (mrs) is an organization of materials researchers worldwide that promotes communication for the advancement of interdisciplinary materials research and technology to improve the quality of life.

Community Improvement
10
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
11
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
12
National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States

The national trust for historic preservation in the united states protects significant places representing our diverse cultural experiences by taking direct action and inspiring broad public support.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missouri Botanical Garden Board of Trustees; the most unlike its peers is Retina Research and Development Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WINGS OF HOPE: $52,000 · InternationalWINGS OF HOPEMANCHESTER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $11,250 · OtherMANCHESTER UNITED METHODIST CHURCHPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ST LOUIS: $8,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ST LOUISSALVATION ARMY: $4,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYLANDMARKS ASSOCIATION: $4,000 · OtherLANDMARKS ASSOCIATIONGATEWAY CHAPTER-NATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $4,000 · OtherGATEWAY CHAPTER-NATIONAL MS SOCIETYST MARKS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $3,000 · OtherST MARKS UNITED METHODIST CHURCHNATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $1,500 · Other+18 more: $6,805 · Other+18 moreST ANDREWS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $12,000 · PhilanthropyST ANDREWS C…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $600 · Arts & CultureTHE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT HOUSE IN EBSWORTH PARK: $450 · Arts & CultureMISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $400 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $225 · Arts & CultureForest Park Forever Inc: $400 · EnvironmentMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $345 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $300 · EnvironmentNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $500 · HealthYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $100 · Recreation & Sports
International$52,000Other$42,555Philanthropy$12,000Education$2,000Arts & Culture$1,675Environment$1,045Health$500Recreation & Sports$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWINGS OF HOPE: $52,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetST ANDREWS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT HOUSE IN EBSWORTH PARK: $450 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRETINA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $400 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $345 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $225 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI CURES EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $150 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WINGS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds ST ANDREWS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT HOUSE IN EBSWORTH PARK ↗
  • Who funds Forest Park Forever Inc ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds RETINA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI CURES EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOSEMITE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Donald and Ruth V Malvern Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Donald and Ruth V Malvern Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Donald and Ruth V Malvern’s filings →

    More from the funding graph