Skip to content

· Private foundation

Donald and Betty Burke Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$110kHealth$3kInternational$2kEducation$2kHousing & Shelter$2kRecreation & Sports$2kHuman Services$1kCrime & Legal$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
6
States reached
$20k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUDAH CHURCH$9,071
Individual grant recipient$6,750
JOHN RITCHESON MINISTRIES$4,720
JOHN YAW BOAFA MINISTRIES$1,500
HAVEN OF REST RESCUE MISSION$650
THE HAPPY SHOES PROJECT$500
COMMUNITY FAMILY CHURCH AND TBM$500
DOVE SONG MINISTRIES$250
FLASHPOINT ARMY$200
CROSS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$110
SULLINS ACADEMY$100
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$25
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BOYS TOWN: $300 → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25 → 14%THE HAPPY SHOES PROJECT: $550 → 12%THE HAPPY SHOES PROJECT: $500 → 12%THE HAPPY SHOES PROJECT: $300 → 12%THE HAPPY SHOES PROJECT: $200 → 12%THE HAPPY SHOES PROJECT: $100 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

OH
NE
MO
KY
VA
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 92% of Donald and Betty Burke Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 17% of the giving stays in VA; by stated purpose, 2%.

Donald and Betty Burke Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$132k · 23 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
27

Total granted

$132k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+11%

Still filing today

26%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHealthHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HAVEN OF REST RESCUE MISSION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2k · revenue +15%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    4× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +81%
  • TH
    THE HAPPY SHOES PROJECT
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • HF
    HIGHLANDS FELLOWSHIP CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • JB
    JOHN BATTLE HIGH SCHOOL BASKET BALL TRACKFIELD
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
2
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
3
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
4
Virtua Medical Group Pa

The physicians of virtua medical group (vmg) share a common philosophy in all they do: to create an outstanding experience for patients. in a broad range of specialties, from family medicine to surgery to oncology, vmg's highly-trained…

Health
5
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
6
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
7
St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s

To continue christ's healing love through delivery of competent & compassionate healthcare in an environment sensitive to the needs of all people. the hospital is committed to providing a broad range of quality inpatient and outpatient…

Health
8
Yale New Haven Hospital

The mission of ynhh is to provide innovative and excellent patient care, teaching, research, and service to the communities it serves.

Health
9
St Lukes Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
10
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
11
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
12
Olivet Medical Ministry Inc

Lackey clinic's mission is to provide skilled, compassionate health care and counseling to the medically disadvantaged in a manner that honors the name of jesus christ.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Happy Shoes Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $88,848 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJUDAH CHURCH: $16,946 · OtherJUDAH CHURCHJOHN RITCHESON MINISTRIES: $4,720 · Other+39 more: $29,697 · Other+39 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,120 · ReligionONE VOICE MINISTRIES INC: $285 · ReligionDOVE SONG MINISTRIES: $250 · ReligionHAVEN OF REST RESCUE MISSION INC: $2,475 · Housing & ShelterTHE HAPPY SHOES PROJECT: $1,650 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $300 · Human Services+1 more: $25 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $675 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 · HealthBRISTOL LIFE SAVING CREW INC: $50 · HealthPITTMAN CENTER COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $150 · Public Safety & DisasterGOODSON-KINDERHOOK VOLUNTEER FIRE D INC: $50 · Public Safety & DisasterVIRGINIA SHERIFFS' INSTITUTE INC: $100 · Crime & Legal
Other$140,211Religion$2,655Housing & Shelter$2,475Human Services$1,975Health$825Public Safety & Disaster$200Crime & Legal$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAVEN OF REST RESCUE MISSION INC: $2,475 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,120 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HAPPY SHOES PROJECT: $1,650 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $675 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE VOICE MINISTRIES INC: $285 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOVE SONG MINISTRIES: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPITTMAN CENTER COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA SHERIFFS' INSTITUTE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSULLINS ACADEMY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOODSON-KINDERHOOK VOLUNTEER FIRE D INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HAVEN OF REST RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds THE HAPPY SHOES PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds ONE VOICE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds DOVE SONG MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds PITTMAN CENTER COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA7.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Donald and Betty Burke Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Donald and Betty Burke Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Donald and Betty Burke Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Donald and Betty Burke Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Donald and Betty Burke’s filings →

    More from the funding graph