Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dona & Sam Scott Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$610k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$280k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$1.2MYouth Development$806kEducation$317kHealth$316kPublic Benefit$300kInternational$268kFood & Nutrition$151kHousing & Shelter$65kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $160k
  • $250k+1 grant · $280k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$9.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$280,000
WESTCOAST BLACK THEATER TROUPE$160,000
RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN$42,500
ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK$21,000
SPARCC SAFE PLACE AND RAPE CRISIS CENTER$16,000
AMERICAN BUSINESS IMMIGRATION COALITION (ABIC)$15,000
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$15,000
PROJECT PRIDE$10,000
BLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER$10,000
MARIE SELBY BOTANICAL GARDENS$10,000
AFTER SCHOOL MATTERS$10,000
SARASOTA ART MUSEUM$7,500
EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA COUNTY$5,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$3,000
NAACP$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COVENANT HOUSE: $25k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $25k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.2M · 20 repeat orgs$485k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
12

Total granted

$3.2M
$431k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+48%

Still filing today

75%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureCivil RightsEmploymentFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    AFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $800k · revenue +90%
  • SARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $316k · revenue +93%
  • RC
    RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $208k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $300k · revenue +48%
  • XT
    XS Tennis and Education Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +404%
  • CU
    CHICAGO URBAN LEAGUEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $35k · revenue +56%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

3
Spelman College

Spelman college, a historically black college and global leader in the education of women of african descent, is dedicated to the academic excellence of its students.

Education
4
The Chicago High School for the Arts

The chicago high school for the arts (chiarts) develops the next generation of diverse, artistically promising scholar-artists through intensive pre-professional training in the arts, combined with a comprehensive college preparatory…

Education
5
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
6
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
7
Chicago Theatre Group Inc

The chicago theatre group is committed to producing both classic and contemporary works giving full voice to a wide range of artists and visions. by dedicating itself to three guiding principles - quality, equity, and community - the…

Arts & Culture
8
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
9
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
10
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
11
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
12
AI4ALL

Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Black Ensemble Theater Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Covenant House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Foundations & Phi…Emergency Food and Crisis A…Youth Sports ProgramsIndependent K-8 SchoolsCivil Legal Aid & AdvocacyTheater & Performing Arts
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr14%8%5–10yr18%15%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr14%39%35–55yr15%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr18%15%10–20yr17%36%20–35yr14%34%35–55yr15%15%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
16%
5,602/35,696

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
20/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WESTCOAST BLACK THEATER TROUPE — $660,000 · OtherWESTCOAST BLACK THEATER TROUPEWESTCOAST BLACK THEATER TROUP — $215,000 · OtherWESTCOAST BLACK THEATER TROUPTHE CHICAGO COUN OF GLOBAL AFFAIR — $127,703 · OtherTHE CHICAGO COUN OF GLOBAL AFFAIRSARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $61,500 · OtherSARASOTA ART MUSEUM — $47,500 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSE — $65,000 · OtherXS Tennis and Education Foundation — $50,000 · Other+13 more — $124,750 · Other+13 moreAFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC — $800,000 · EducationAFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INCRINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC — $208,125 · EducationRINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN…GAMMA XI BOULE FOUNDATION INC — $42,000 · Education+3 more — $47,000 · EducationTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION — $300,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BARACK OBAM…BLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION — $180,000 · Arts & CultureBLACK ENSEMBLE …+3 more — $10,000 · Arts & CultureSARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $315,850 · HealthSARASOTA …ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC — $131,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $20,000 · Food & NutritionTHE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS — $135,000 · InternationalThe Cara Program — $60,000 · EmploymentCHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE — $35,000 · Employment
Other$1,351,453Education$1,097,125Arts & Culture$490,000Health$315,850Food & Nutrition$151,000International$135,000Employment$95,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC — $800,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetSARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $315,850 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC — $208,125 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION — $180,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetTHE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS — $135,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC — $131,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $61,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetThe Cara Program — $60,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetXS Tennis and Education Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGAMMA XI BOULE FOUNDATION INC — $42,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA COUNTY — $35,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE — $35,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProvidence St Mel School — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVISIBLE MEN ACADEMY INC — $7,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGIRLS INC OF CHICAGO — $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S SPORTS MUSEUM INC — $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetONE MILLION DEGREES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $4,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASOLO THEATRE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHermitage Artist Retreat Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASSOC FOR THE STUDY OF AFRICAN AMERICAN LIFE & HIS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMALONE COMMUNITY CENTER — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co IncFL17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · AbbVie Foundation · The Allstate Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dona & Sam Scott Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc1% of income from government
  • Hermitage Artist Retreat Inc1% of income from government
  • The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph