Skip to content

· Private foundation

Don Howarth & Suzelle Smith Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$176k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$808kEducation$362kHuman Services$248kInternational$194kCrime & Legal$114kHealth$83kYouth Development$81kArts & Culture$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $125k
$7,325
Median grant
10
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY$22,000
HOPE WALKS$20,000
WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS$13,000
DEPORTED ASYLUM SEEKERS ASSISTANCE PROJECT$10,000
DIABLO VALLEY VETERANS FOUNDATION$10,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL$10,000
PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND$10,000
INTERVARSITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP$10,000
GRACE KLEIN COMMUNITY$10,000
HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES$10,000
ST AIDANS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$9,873
AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC$7,325
MALIBU COMMUNITY LABOR EXCHANGE$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA$5,000
ST FRANCIS OF ASSISI CATHOLIC COMMUNITY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SPOKEN WORLDWIDE: $6k → 14%SPOKEN WORLDWIDE: $2k → 14%SPOKEN WORLDWIDE: $1k → 14%GRACE KLEIN COMMUNITY: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
NY
MA
IN
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
NC
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 24 repeat orgs$228k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
24

Total granted

$1.9M
$179k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+4%

Still filing today

54%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $314k · revenue +17%
  • HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $81k · revenue +157%
  • HW
    HOPE WALKS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $62k
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • EC
    EUROPEAN CULTURAL CENTRE
    one grant, 2023 · $17k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
2
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
3
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
4
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
5
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
6
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
7
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
8
Human Rights Watch Inc

Human rights watch ("hrw") defends the rights of people worldwide. we scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. human rights watch is an independent,…

International
9
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
10
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
11
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
12
Los Angeles Mission Inc

The los angeles mission breaks the cycle of homelessness and poverty, by stabilizing people in a safe and spiritual environment, connecting them to solutions and walking with them on their journey.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Malibu Friends of Music. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/32
Grantees still filing
20/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST AIDANS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $329,341 · OtherST AIDANS EPISCOPAL CHURCHTHE SALVATION ARMY: $238,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC: $172,000 · OtherWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INCLAWNDALE WESLEYAN CHURCH: $121,500 · OtherLAWNDALE WESLEYAN CHURCHSEED COMPANY INC: $106,000 · OtherSEED COMPANY INCHOPE WALKS: $80,000 · OtherHOPE WALKSIndividual grant recipient: $61,613 · OtherTHE MALIBU COMMUNITY LABOR EXCHANGE: $55,000 · Other+33 more: $210,636 · Other+33 moreAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $314,064 · EducationAMERICANS FOR OX…+2 more: $2,400 · EducationHOPE WALKS INC: $60,000 · InternationalHOPE WALKS…Deported Asylum Seekers Assistance Project Inc: $50,000 · InternationalDeported A…CURE INTERNATIONAL INC: $40,000 · InternationalCURE INTER…Save The Children Federation Inc: $20,000 · InternationalSave The C…PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $10,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $8,000 · International+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalChristian Legal Aid of Los Angeles CO Gary Maeder: $63,500 · Crime & LegalPRISON FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL: $50,000 · Crime & LegalHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $81,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Dallas Opera: $27,500 · Arts & CultureOPERA BIRMINGHAM INC: $9,000 · Arts & CultureMALIBU FRIENDS OF MUSIC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $30,000 · Religion
Other$1,374,090Education$316,464International$193,000Crime & Legal$113,500Youth Development$81,000Arts & Culture$42,000Religion$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $314,064 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $81,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetChristian Legal Aid of Los Angeles CO Gary Maeder: $63,500 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetHOPE WALKS INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MALIBU COMMUNITY LABOR EXCHANGE: $55,000 over 7y, 8.2% of budgetPRISON FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDeported Asylum Seekers Assistance Project Inc: $50,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetCURE INTERNATIONAL INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Dallas Opera: $27,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERA BIRMINGHAM INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetT4 Global Inc: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD SHARE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SANTA MONICA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALS Network: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFULCRUM ARTS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF SPEAKEASY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON SENSE MEDIA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Christian Legal Aid of Los Angeles CO Gary Maeder ↗
  • Who funds HOPE WALKS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MALIBU COMMUNITY LABOR EXCHANGE ↗
  • Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Deported Asylum Seekers Assistance Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds CURE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
  • Who funds The Dallas Opera ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ANGEL FOOD ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GRACE KLEIN COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND ↗
  • Who funds DIABLO VALLEY VETERANS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPERA BIRMINGHAM INC ↗
  • Who funds T4 Global Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds INT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MALIBU FRIENDS OF MUSIC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tyndale House MinistriesIL13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tyndale House Ministries · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · Servant Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Don Howarth & Suzelle Smith Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Don Howarth & Suzelle Smith Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Don Howarth & Suzelle Smith Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Don Howarth & Suzelle Smith Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Don Howarth & Suzelle Smith’s filings →

More from the funding graph