Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Ascend Justice

Our mission is to empower individuals and families impacted by gender-based violence or the child welfare system to achieve safety and stability through holistic legal advocacy and systemic reform.

$143k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$77k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222023.

Crime & Legal$204kHuman Services$31kHealth$19k
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $136,400 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $143,446 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $7,046 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $128k
$51,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
A SAFE PLACE$77,400
SAFER FOUNDATION (FOR WOMEN'S JUSTICE INSTITUTE)$51,000
ILLINOIS LEGAL AID ONLINE$8,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY RESCUE: $13k → 14%SARAH'S INN: $13k → 14%THE NETWORK ADVOCATING AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Crisis Centers Inc

Walk with people facing violence, offering safety, support, and hope as they heal and rebuild. with every step forward, we build stronger, more resilient communities.

Human Services
2
Turning Point Advocacy Services

Our mission is to assist survivors and their children in learning to overcome the cycle of physical, sexual, mental, and emotional health.

Health
3
Domestic Abuse Intervention Services Inc

Our mission is to empower those affected by domestic violence and advocate for social change through support, education, and outreach.

Human Services
4
Safehouse Denver Inc

Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…

Human Services
5
Ohio Domestic Violence Network

Started in 1989, odvn mobilizes a statewide voice on domestic violence and promotes quality services for survivors that focus on safety and self- determination.

Human Services
6
Safe Nesttemporary Assistance for

Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.

Human Services
7
News

News is dedicated to providing safety, hope, healing and empowerment for survivors of domestic and sexual abuse. equally, news is committed to promoting safe communities and social change through prevention, intervention, education, and…

Human Services
8
Womens Resource Center of Newport and Bristol Counties

The women's resource center empowers survivors by providing trauma-informed services with equity and compassion while working collaboratively with the community to eliminate the root causes of interpersonal abuse.

Human Services
9
Safe Passage Inc

To prevent domestic violence and sexual assault in dekalb county

Human Services
10
Clackamas Women's Services

Breaking the isolation of domestic and sexual violence.

Human Services
11
Latinos in Virginia Empowerment Center

Provide education, advocacy, and support to spanish speaking individuals affected by violence and injustice in virginia to ensure that they can access services to empower them to become happy, healthy, and self- sufficient.

Crime & Legal
12
Women Against Abuse Inc

The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Rescue Inc and the most unlike its peers is Remedies Renewing Lives. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER — $144,967 · OtherLAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTERSafer Foundation — $51,000 · Crime & LegalSafer FoundationILLINOIS LEGAL AID ONLINE — $8,000 · Crime & LegalILLINOIS LEGAL AID ONLINESARAH'S INN — $12,500 · Human ServicesSARAH'S INNFAMILY RESCUE INC — $12,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESCUE…THE NETWORK ADVOCATING AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $6,088 · Human ServicesTHE NETWORK A…REMEDIES RENEWING LIVES — $13,610 · HealthILLINOIS COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $5,073 · Health
Other$144,967Crime & Legal$59,000Human Services$31,088Health$18,683

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER — $144,967 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSafer Foundation — $51,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREMEDIES RENEWING LIVES — $13,610 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSARAH'S INN — $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY RESCUE INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetILLINOIS LEGAL AID ONLINE — $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NETWORK ADVOCATING AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $6,088 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetILLINOIS COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $5,073 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chicago Foundation for WomenIL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chicago Foundation for Women · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · The Chicago Community Trust · Illinois Coalition Against Domestic Violence · Michael Reese Health Trust · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ascend Justice funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph