Skip to content
Doligale Family Charitable Foundaton at a glance

· Private foundation

Doligale Family Charitable Foundaton

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$67k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$120kHousing & Shelter$53kHealth$42kReligion$35kEducation$11kAnimals$8kYouth Development$7kHuman Services$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $41k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WaterStep$15,500
Best Buddies International$15,000
Coalition for the Homeless$10,000
Cross Ministry Group$5,000
Southeast Christian Church$5,000
American Heart Association$5,000
Happy Hooves$3,000
Pinehaven$2,500
TWLOHA$2,000
Prodigal Ministries$1,500
Fraternal Order of Eagles$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Children With Hair Loss: $100 → 10%YMCA of Greater Louisville: $1k → 15%Hosparus Health: $5k → 15%Prodigal Ministries: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
MI
OH
CA
CO
KY
AZ
TN
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$259k · 13 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +87% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
16

Total granted

$259k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%
+11%

Still filing today

62%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentReligionInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    WATERSTEP INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $68k · revenue +131%
  • Best Buddies International Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $52k · revenue +87%
  • TC
    THE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $45k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • GO
    Gate of Hope Ministries
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • HI
    HOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEALTH
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +17%
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR GIRLS INC LOUISVILLE GIRLS LEADERSHIP
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -47%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
2
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
3
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
4
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
5
Holy Cross Hospital Inc

We, holy cross hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. holy cross hospital is a member of trinity health.

Health
6
Oneblood Inc

To enhance the health and well-being of others through our work with blood and stem cell products and by facilitating scientific research

Health
7
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
8
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
9
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
10
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
11
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
12
Young Men's Christian Association

The burbank community ymca (burbank y) is committed to strengthening the foundation of our community through youth development, healthy living, and social responsibility. we work within our community to ensure that everyone, regardless of…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Twloha Inc; the most unlike its peers is BIKE4ALZ Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $44,500 · OtherTHE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INCCostco: $8,463 · OtherCostcoHAPPY HOOVES: $8,000 · OtherHAPPY HOOVESSOUTHEAST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF JEFFERSON COUNTY KENTUCKY INC: $5,500 · OtherSOUTHEAST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF JEFFE…Gate of Hope Ministries: $5,000 · OtherGate of Hope MinistriesTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC: $4,360 · OtherPinehaven: $3,500 · Other+10 more: $9,473 · Other+10 moreWATERSTEP INC: $68,340 · Youth DevelopmentWATERSTEP INC+1 more: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentBest Buddies International Inc: $52,000 · InternationalBest Buddies Interna…American Heart Association Inc: $28,000 · HealthAmerican Hear…TWLOHA INC: $5,003 · HealthTWLOHA INC+3 more: $1,650 · HealthThe Cross Ministry Group: $20,000 · ReligionJESUSONLINE MINISTRIES: $1,000 · ReligionOLDHAM COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP: $9,075 · EducationHOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEALTH: $5,000 · Human ServicesPRODIGAL MINISTRIES INC: $1,500 · Human Servicesthe Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human Services
Other$88,796Youth Development$70,340International$52,000Health$34,653Religion$21,000Education$9,075Human Services$7,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWATERSTEP INC: $68,340 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $52,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $44,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $28,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cross Ministry Group: $20,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetOLDHAM COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP: $9,075 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetTWLOHA INC: $5,003 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEALTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC: $4,360 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR GIRLS INC LOUISVILLE GIRLS LEADERSHIP: $2,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPRODIGAL MINISTRIES INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJESUSONLINE MINISTRIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetthe Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPEED ART MUSEUM: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTORMHAVEN YOUTH RANCH INC: $300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDARE TO CARE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN WITH HAIR LOSS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…The Gheens Foundation…The Community Foundat…Lift a Life Foundatio…Republic Bank Foundat…The Community Foundat…Mightycause Charitabl…Baird Foundation IncV V Cooke Foundation …Snowy Owl Foundation …Metro United Way IncHonorable Order of Ke…
The Community Foundation of Louisville IncKY21.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · Lift a Life Foundation Inc · Republic Bank Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · V V Cooke Foundation Corporation · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · Metro United Way Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Doligale Family Charitable Foundaton funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Doligale Family Charitable Foundaton. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Doligale Family Charitable Foundaton’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home