Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Doligale Family Charitable Foundaton

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$67k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

International$120kHousing & Shelter$53kHealth$42kReligion$35kEducation$11kAnimals$8kYouth Development$7kHuman Services$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $41k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WaterStep$15,500
Best Buddies International$15,000
Coalition for the Homeless$10,000
American Heart Association$5,000
Cross Ministry Group$5,000
Southeast Christian Church$5,000
Happy Hooves$3,000
Pinehaven$2,500
TWLOHA$2,000
Prodigal Ministries$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Fraternal Order of Eagles$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Children With Hair Loss: $100 → 10%YMCA of Greater Louisville: $1k → 15%Hosparus Health: $5k → 15%Prodigal Ministries: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
IL
MI
OH
CA
CO
KY
AZ
TN
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$259k · 13 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
16

Total granted

$259k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+11%

Still filing today

62%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentReligionInternationalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    WATERSTEP INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $68k · revenue +131%
  • Best Buddies International Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $52k · revenue +87%
  • TC
    THE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $45k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • HI
    HOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEALTH
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +17%
  • GO
    Gate of Hope Ministries
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR GIRLS INC LOUISVILLE GIRLS LEADERSHIP
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
2
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
3
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
4
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
5
Holy Cross Hospital Inc

We, holy cross hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. holy cross hospital is a member of trinity health.

Health
6
Oneblood Inc

To enhance the health and well-being of others through our work with blood and stem cell products and by facilitating scientific research

Health
7
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
8
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

9
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

10
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

11
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

12
Young Men's Christian Association

The burbank community ymca (burbank y) is committed to strengthening the foundation of our community through youth development, healthy living, and social responsibility. we work within our community to ensure that everyone, regardless of…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Twloha Inc and the most unlike its peers is BIKE4ALZ Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHomeless Services & ShelterCommunity Arts OrganizationsFood Pantries & AssistanceCancer Support OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionYmca Community CentersYouth Development CentersHospice Care ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%4%<5yr14%4%5–10yr18%13%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr14%29%35–55yr18%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr18%12%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr14%43%35–55yr18%14%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
12%
2,432/20,293

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $44,500 · OtherTHE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INCCostco — $8,463 · OtherCostcoHAPPY HOOVES — $8,000 · OtherHAPPY HOOVESSOUTHEAST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF JEFFERSON COUNTY KENTUCKY INC — $5,500 · OtherSOUTHEAST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF JEFFE…Gate of Hope Ministries — $5,000 · OtherGate of Hope MinistriesTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC — $4,360 · OtherPinehaven — $3,500 · Other+10 more — $9,473 · Other+10 moreWATERSTEP INC — $68,340 · Youth DevelopmentWATERSTEP INC+1 more — $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentBest Buddies International Inc — $52,000 · InternationalBest Buddies Interna…American Heart Association Inc — $28,000 · HealthAmerican Hear…TWLOHA INC — $5,003 · HealthTWLOHA INC+3 more — $1,650 · HealthThe Cross Ministry Group — $20,000 · ReligionJESUSONLINE MINISTRIES — $1,000 · ReligionOLDHAM COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP — $9,075 · EducationHOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEALTH — $5,000 · Human ServicesPRODIGAL MINISTRIES INC — $1,500 · Human Servicesthe Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc — $1,000 · Human Services+1 more — $100 · Human Services
Other$88,796Youth Development$70,340International$52,000Health$34,653Religion$21,000Education$9,075Human Services$7,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWATERSTEP INC — $68,340 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc — $52,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $44,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $28,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cross Ministry Group — $20,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetOLDHAM COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP — $9,075 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetTWLOHA INC — $5,003 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEALTH — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC — $4,360 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR GIRLS INC LOUISVILLE GIRLS LEADERSHIP — $2,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPRODIGAL MINISTRIES INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetthe Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJESUSONLINE MINISTRIES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPEED ART MUSEUM — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTORMHAVEN YOUTH RANCH INC — $300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDARE TO CARE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN WITH HAIR LOSS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Louisville IncKY21.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · Lift a Life Foundation Inc · Republic Bank Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · V V Cooke Foundation Corporation · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · Metro United Way Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Doligale Family Charitable Foundaton funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph