Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dola Hamilton Stemberg Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$461k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$225k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of DOLA HAMILTON STEMBERG CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $335k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OLD DARTMOUTH HISTORICAL SOCIETY (THE NEW BEDFORD WHALING MUSEUM)$225,000
DEXTER SCHOOL$60,000
THE BALDWIN SCHOOL$50,000
FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION$25,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC$25,000
OLD BOHEMIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC$25,000
TUNNEL TOWERS FOUNDATION$25,000
MGH - PACT PROGRAM FUND$10,000
THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$5,000
PRINCETON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$5,000
HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL$1,500
GROTON SCHOOL$1,500
THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL$1,000
HARVARD COLLEGE FUND$500
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $185k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $30k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $30k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
OK
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 17 repeat orgs$249k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
6

Total granted

$2.2M
$199k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+244%

Still filing today

65%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GB
    GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $287k · revenue +1%
  • Old Dartmouth Historical Society
    4× · 2022–2025 · $275k · revenue +142%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $185k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • DIRECT RELIEF
    one grant, 2022 · $53k · revenue +8%
  • BS
    BALDWIN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • VF
    VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -61%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
2
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
3
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

5
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
6
Harbor School

Inspiring young scholars to contribute their wisdom, compassion, and personal best in the classroom, the community and the world.

Education
7
New England Lawboston

New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…

Education
8
Hampden-Sydney College

Since 1775, the mission of Hampden-Sydney College has been to form good men and good citizens in an atmosphere of sound learning.

Education
9
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
10
Stoneleigh-Burnham School

Stoneleigh-burnham school is an academic community that fosters an international perspective. we inspire girls to pursue meaningful lives based on honor, respect, and intellectual curiosity. each student is challenged to discover her best…

Education
11
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
12
Brown School

Running a private school.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of the Lawrenceville School and the most unlike its peers is Old Bohemia Historical Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DEXTER SCHOOL — $370,000 · OtherDEXTER SCHOOLTUNNEL TOWERS FOUNDATION — $337,500 · OtherTUNNEL TOWERS FOUNDATIONOld Bohemia Historical Society Inc — $303,000 · OtherOld Bohemia Historical Society IncGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $287,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC+9 more — $203,343 · Other+9 moreOld Dartmouth Historical Society — $275,000 · Arts & CultureOld Dartmout…FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $103,000 · EducationFOLDS OF H…THE BALDWIN SCHOOL — $50,000 · EducationTHE BALDWI…GROTON SCHOOL — $47,500 · EducationGROTON SCH…The Madeira School — $25,000 · EducationThe Madeir…+2 more — $3,500 · EducationWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $185,000 · Human ServicesFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $152,000 · Food & NutritionDIRECT RELIEF — $52,500 · InternationalHands Together Inc — $11,000 · InternationalVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,500,843Arts & Culture$275,000Education$229,000Human Services$185,000Food & Nutrition$152,000International$63,500Philanthropy$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOld Bohemia Historical Society Inc — $303,000 over 3y, 89% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $287,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOld Dartmouth Historical Society — $275,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $185,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $152,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $103,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $52,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BALDWIN SCHOOL — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGROTON SCHOOL — $47,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVIETNAM VETERANS WORKSHOP INC DBA NEW ENGLAND CENTER AND HOME FOR VETERANS — $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Madeira School — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPine Island Camp — $15,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetHands Together Inc — $11,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCATHLEEN STONE ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL INC — $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Old Bohemia Historical Society Inc
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds Old Dartmouth Historical Society
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE BALDWIN SCHOOL
  • Who funds GROTON SCHOOL
  • Who funds VIETNAM VETERANS WORKSHOP INC DBA NEW ENGLAND CENTER AND HOME FOR VETERANS
  • Who funds The Madeira School
  • Who funds Pine Island Camp
  • Who funds Hands Together Inc
  • Who funds CATHLEEN STONE ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dola Hamilton Stemberg Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Vietnam Veterans Workshop Inc Dba New England Center and Home for Veterans66% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology35% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc22% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc5% of income from government
  • Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc2% of income from government
  • Old Dartmouth Historical Society2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph