Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dodt Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$62kArts & Culture$39kYouth Development$26kHealth$23kHousing & Shelter$22kFood & Nutrition$9kEducation$8kEnvironment$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$639k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PETER & PAUL CHURCH$4,000
NORTHSIDE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$3,500
SOLVE$2,150
Individual grant recipient$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF ALBANY FOUNDATION$1,000
TURNING POINTS$1,000
MANATEE PLAYERS$1,000
JOY FM$700
CATHOLIC FAITH APPEAL$450
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MANASOTA SOLVE INC: $6k → 10%MANASOTA SOLVE INC: $4k → 10%MANASOTA SOLVE INC: $3k → 10%Manasota SOLVE Inc: $3k → 10%MANASOTA SOLVE INC: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$211k · 22 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
9

Total granted

$211k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
0%

Still filing today

36%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MANASOTA-SOLVE INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $17k · revenue +115%
  • FC
    Florida Cultural Group Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +230%
  • UA
    UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +169%

Funded once

  • MC
    MANATEE COUNTY GIRLS CLUB FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -4%
  • NM
    NORTHSIDE METHODIST CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • RD
    R DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL PTO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +185% · 37% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Womens Care Florida Foundation
—
2
Manatee County Girls Club Inc

To provide the framework within which girls can aspire to more successful lifestyles, to seek a better education, to secure meaningful and financially-equitable employment, and to become responsible and caring members of our society.

Youth Development
3
Manatee County Historical Commission Inc

To preserve and promote manatee countys heritage and history.

—
4
Tampa Women Stars Inc
Community Improvement
5
Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Florida Foundation Inc

To reserve capital for the purpose of income generation to support the boys & girls clubs of central florida, inc.

Youth Development
6
Tampa Bay Partnership Inc

The tampa bay partnership is a privately funded, ceo-driven regional advocacy organization, committed to creating a unified, competitive and prosperous tampa bay.

—
7
The Arc Tampa Bay Foundation Inc

To secure the financial future of services for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities served by the arc tampa bay, inc. (continued on schedule o)this mission is accomplished through a comprehensive plan of building…

Human Services
8
Community First Credit Union of Florida

Community first credit union of florida's mission is to provide the highest in quality financial solutions for every stage of life.

—
9
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
10
Tallahassee State College Foundation Inc

The foundation raises charitable funds from the public to provide support to the college through student scholarships, awards, and faculty support for academic extracurricular activities.

Education
11
Tampa Bay Times Fund Inc
—
12
The Tampa Bay History Center Foundation Inc

To provide support to and to receive and administer funds for the charitable and educational operations of the tampa bay history center, inc.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Manatee County Girls Club Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Girls' Club Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PETER & PAUL CHURCH: $33,300 · OtherST PETER & PAUL CHURCHART CENTER MANATEE: $25,000 · OtherART CENTER MANATEENORTHSIDE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $21,500 · OtherNORTHSIDE UNITED METHODIST CHURCHMANATEE COUNTY SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREV: $20,000 · OtherMANATEE COUNTY SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVJUST FOR GIRLS MANATEE COUNTY: $20,000 · OtherJUST FOR GIRLS MANATEE COUNTYIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+17 more: $40,950 · Other+17 moreMANASOTA-SOLVE INC: $16,800 · Human ServicesFlorida Cultural Group Inc: $9,000 · Arts & CultureREFLECTIONS OF MANATEE INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY AT ALBANY FOUNDATION: $5,500 · EducationR DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL PTO INC: $2,500 · EducationSOLVE: $7,800 · EnvironmentMANATEE COUNTY GIRLS CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE CRISIS CENTER OF TAMPA BAY INC: $3,000 · Health
Other$175,750Human Services$16,800Arts & Culture$10,000Education$8,000Environment$7,800Youth Development$5,000Health$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMANASOTA-SOLVE INC: $16,800 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFlorida Cultural Group Inc: $9,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSOLVE: $7,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOUR DAILY BREAD TAMPA BAY INC: $5,700 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY AT ALBANY FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMANATEE COUNTY GIRLS CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE CRISIS CENTER OF TAMPA BAY INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetR DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL PTO INC: $2,500 over 1y, 37% of budgetCommunity Coalition on Homelessness dba Turning Points: $2,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ONESTAR FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GIRLS' CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MANASOTA-SOLVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Florida Cultural Group Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOLVE ↗
  • Who funds OUR DAILY BREAD TAMPA BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MANATEE COUNTY GIRLS CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CRISIS CENTER OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds R DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL PTO INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Coalition on Homelessness dba Turning Points ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ONESTAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REFLECTIONS OF MANATEE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GIRLS' CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dodt Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dodt Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • The Crisis Center of Tampa Bay Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Solve: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dodt Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dodt Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dodt Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph