Skip to content
DMBradley II Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

DMBradley II Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Animals$239kPhilanthropy$11kHuman Services$7kHealth$6k
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$642k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IronWood Pig Sanctuary$5,000
Windys Ranch and Rescue$4,000
Gracies Acres$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Better Piggies Rescue$2,000
Lil Orphan Hammies$2,000
Oinking Acres Farm Rescue$2,000
Longhopes Donkey Shelter$2,000
Snouts of Sedona$2,000
One Love Pit Bull Foundation$2,000
Pig Luv Co$2,000
Kanda Farm Sanctuary$2,000
Hog Haven Farm$1,500
All Friends Animal Sanctuary$1,000
Love Them All Sanctuary and Rescue$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Better Piggies Rescue: $2k → 11%Snouts of Sedona: $2k → 14%Ironwood Foundation: $6k → 19%Pig Luv Co: $2k → 12%Woodstock Farm Animal Sanctuary: $5k → 16%Aurthurs Acres Animal Sanctuary: $3k → 16%Cotton Branch Farm Sanctuary: $5k → 11%Pig Advocates League: $5k → 13%Gracies Acres: $5k → 7%Gracies Acres: $4k → 15%Ziggys Refuge Farm Sanctuary: $5k → 17%Best Friends Animal Society: $3k → 9%Longhopes Donkey Shelter: $2k → 10%Oinking Acres Farm Reserve: $4k → 5%Kandra Farms: $5k → 10%Shiloh Rescue Ranch: $3k → 11%Vegas Pig Pets: $5k → 13%Gentle Giants Draft Horse Rescue: $3k → 6%Ironwood Foundation: $5k → 19%Woodstock Farm Sanctuary: $2k → 16%Cotton Branch Farm Sanctuary: $2k → 11%Pig Advocates League: $4k → 13%Gracies Acres: $5k → 7%Ziggys Rescue and Farm Sanctuary: $4k → 17%Oinking Acres Farm Rescue: $2k → 5%Kandra Farms: $3k → 10%Shiloh Rescue Ranch: $3k → 11%Vegas Pig Pets: $3k → 13%Gentle Giants Draft Horse Rescue: $3k → 6%Better Piggies Rescue: $2k → 11%Woodstock Farm Sanctuary: $2k → 16%Pig Advocates League: $2k → 13%Gracies Acres: $4k → 7%Ziggys Rescue and Farm Sanctuary: $3k → 17%Kanda Farm Sanctuary: $2k → 10%Shiloh Rescue Ranch: $2k → 11%Hearts Alive Village: $3k → 13%Gentle Giants Draft Horse Rescue: $2k → 6%Gracies Acres: $4k → 7%Ziggys Refuge Farm: $3k → 17%Kandra Farm Sanctuary: $2k → 10%Shiloh Rescue Ranch: $2k → 11%Vegas Pig Pets: $3k → 13%Gracies Acres: $3k → 7%Womens Resource Medical Centers of: $5k → 13%Safe Nest: $3k → 13%Windys Ranch and Rescue: $4k → 13%Windys Ranch Rescue: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NV
SD
IN
PA
CA
UT
CO
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$241k · 29 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
7

Total granted

$241k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+28%

Still filing today

59%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WR
    WINDYS RANCH & RESCUE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $18k · revenue +451%
  • TM
    THE MARY C SCHANZ FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $17k · revenue +16%
  • LO
    LIL ORPHAN HAMMIES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • HC
    Heaven Can Wait Sanctuary Animal
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • SN
    Safe Nest
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • ZR
    Ziggys Refuge Farm
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sunset Farms Sanctuary

We provide shelter food and vet care for abandoned abused and neglected animals

Animals
2
2nd Chance Ranch and Rescue

Sanctuary for abused or abandoned animals

Animals
3
Muddy Paws Farm Rescue

Muddy Paws Farm Rescue provides a loving forever home to farm animals who are neglected, abused, bound for slaughter, or otherwise need a new forever home.

Animals
4
Bella View Farm Animal Sanctuary Inc
Animals
5
Happy Hen Animal Sanctuary
Animals
6
Grace Farm Animal Rescue and Sanctu
Animals
7
Martha's Farm Animal Sanctuary
Animals
8
Platte Ranch Forever Home Sanctuary
Animals
9
Angel Wing Acres Animal Welfare Soc Lombas
Animals
10
Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

—
11
Bessies Creek Farm Animal Sanctuary & Rescue

Bessies Creek Farm Animal Sanctuary & Rescue is a non profit animal rescue and sanctuary.

—
12
Pinehaven Farm a Sanctuary Inc

Pinehaven Farm is a non-profit sanctuary dedicated to dogs, cats, horses and other animals in need of a permanent home and the prevention of future overpopulation through education programs on spraying and neutering.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Better Piggies Rescue; the most unlike its peers is The Ironwood Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WINDYS RANCH & RESCUE: $18,000 · AnimalsWINDYS RANCH & RESCUETHE MARY C SCHANZ FOUNDATION: $17,000 · AnimalsTHE MARY C SCHANZ FOUNDATIONPIG ADVOCATES LEAGUE INC: $13,000 · AnimalsPIG ADVOCATES LEAGUE INCLIL ORPHAN HAMMIES: $13,000 · AnimalsLIL ORPHAN HAMMIESWOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $9,000 · AnimalsWOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INCGENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD: $7,500 · AnimalsGENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTDKanda Farm Sanctuary Inc: $7,000 · AnimalsKanda Farm Sanctuary IncZIGGYS REFUGE: $6,500 · Animals+15 more: $36,700 · Animals+15 moreGRACIES ACRES: $24,500 · OtherGRACIES ACRESIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVEGASPIGPETS: $15,000 · OtherVEGASPIGPETSCotton Branch Farm Sanctuary: $9,000 · OtherCotton Branch Farm SanctuaryKandra Farms: $8,000 · OtherKandra FarmsZiggys Rescue and Farm Sanctuary: $8,000 · OtherZiggys Rescue and Farm SanctuaryPig Placement Network: $7,000 · OtherPig Placement NetworkHeaven Can Wait Sanctuary Animal: $5,000 · OtherOinking Acres Farm Reserve: $5,000 · OtherOinking Acres Farm Rescue: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · Other+4 more: $11,500 · Other+4 moreTHE IRONWOOD FOUNDATION: $11,000 · PhilanthropyWOMENS RESOURCE MEDICAL CENTERS: $6,000 · Health
Animals$127,700Other$118,000Philanthropy$11,000Health$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWINDYS RANCH & RESCUE: $18,000 over 8y, 7.7% of budgetTHE MARY C SCHANZ FOUNDATION: $17,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPIG ADVOCATES LEAGUE INC: $13,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetLIL ORPHAN HAMMIES: $13,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetTHE IRONWOOD FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 2y, 89% of budgetWOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKanda Farm Sanctuary Inc: $7,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetZIGGYS REFUGE: $6,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWOMENS RESOURCE MEDICAL CENTERS: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONE LOVE ARIZONA RESCUE ADVOCACY & STERILIZATION: $4,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHEARTS ALIVE VILLAGE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBETTER PIGGIES RESCUE: $4,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetARTHURS ACRES ANIMAL SANCTUARY CORPORATION: $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHOG HAVEN FARM: $3,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSNOUTS OF SEDONA: $3,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBARN BUDDIES RESCUE: $2,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLonghopes Donkey Shelter Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF PET PIGS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPEBBLE RANCH RESCUE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetAll Friends Animal Sanctuary: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WINDYS RANCH & RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds THE MARY C SCHANZ FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PIG ADVOCATES LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds LIL ORPHAN HAMMIES ↗
  • Who funds THE IRONWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds GENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD ↗
  • Who funds Kanda Farm Sanctuary Inc ↗
  • Who funds ZIGGYS REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS RESOURCE MEDICAL CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ONE LOVE ARIZONA RESCUE ADVOCACY & STERILIZATION ↗
  • Who funds HEARTS ALIVE VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds BETTER PIGGIES RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds ARTHURS ACRES ANIMAL SANCTUARY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds HOG HAVEN FARM ↗
  • Who funds SNOUTS OF SEDONA ↗
  • Who funds BARN BUDDIES RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Longhopes Donkey Shelter Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF PET PIGS INC ↗
  • Who funds PEBBLE RANCH RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds LOVE THEM ALL ↗
  • Who funds All Friends Animal Sanctuary ↗
  • Who funds PAW PARTNERS UNLEASHED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vincent C and Pamela …Paypal Charitable Giv…Ge Aerospace Foundati…The Pfizer Foundation…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Vincent C and Pamela A Immordino Charitable FoundationNV13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vincent C and Pamela A Immordino Charitable Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization DMBradley II Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from DMBradley II Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on DMBradley II Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home