Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Djdm Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$52kHuman Services$31kHealth$28kInternational$21kEducation$15kHousing & Shelter$12kArts & Culture$4kCrime & Legal$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$170k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$7,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$4,000
ELIJAH RISING$2,500
THE MASTERS ACADEMY INTERNATIONAL$2,000
PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER EAST$2,000
FRENCH CAMP ACADEMY$1,000
VOICE OF MARTYRS$1,000
HOUSTON PREGNANCY HELP CENTER$1,000
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$1,000
LOVE NETWORK OF BAYTOWN$1,000
FORTIS INSTITUTE$1,000
NDOTO$1,000
STAR OF HOPE$1,000
WYCLIFFE ASSOCIATES$1,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ELIJAH RISING: $3k → 16%ELIJAH RISING: $3k → 16%ELIJAH RISING: $3k → 16%ELIJAH RISING: $3k → 16%ELIJAH RISING: $3k → 16%Elijah Rising: $1k → 16%Elijah Rising: $500 → 16%Elijah Rising: $500 → 16%HOUSTON PREGNANCY HELP CENTER: $1k → 16%Houston Pregnancy Help Center: $500 → 16%Houston Pregnancy Help Center: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
NY
CA
CO
MD
AZ
NC
DC
OK
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$159k · 29 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
6

Total granted

$159k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
0%

Still filing today

55%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $17k · revenue +40%
  • ER
    Elijah Rising
    8× · 2017–2025 · $15k · revenue +70%
  • TM
    The Master's Academy International Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +148%

Funded once

  • AM
    ALONGSIDE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • BC
    Blast Csst Mens Ministries
    one grant, 2019 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Turning Point for God

To broadcast the Gospel of Jesus Christ through the available means including television, radio, internet, recorded, and written formats.

Religion
2
Sozo International Inc

Sozo International partners with at-risk families to create a sustainable future and transformed lives through education, health, and economic initiatives.

3
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
4
Selah International Counseling Ministries

The mission of Selah International Counseling Ministries is to glorify God as we serve and equip His church, providing leadership and service through counseling, counseling resources, and counseling training.

Health
5
Timothy Two Project International

Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.

Religion
6
Oasis Counseling International

To provide to the general public the following services: 1) Individual Psychological Counseling, 2) Play therapy for children, 3)Marriage Counseling, 4) Psychological Evaluations, 5)Financial Counseling, 6)Career Counseling, 7)psychiatric,…

Religion
7
Treasuring Christ Together Network

Nurturing healthy pastors and healthy churches to plant healthy reproducing churches

Religion
8
Faith Aid

The organization cares for the sick and suffering in Jesus name by partnering with Christian mission hospitals, helping patients unable to afford treatment, and supporting Mustard Seed House ministry locations in Kenya.

International
9
Alongside Inc

Restore hope, purpose, passion and relationships among Christian leaders who are making an impact around the world.

Religion
10
LifeHouse of Houston Inc

LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.

11
Life Network

Life Network provides support and mentoring to women and men facing unexpected pregnancies; offers parenting support, material resources, and referrals; and promotes sexual risk avoidance through education to foster a culture that values…

Health
12
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Along Side Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is Noahs House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Child and Family ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Developmental Disabilities …Pregnancy Support ServicesSubstance Abuse TreatmentChristian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%5%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr16%36%20–35yr10%32%35–55yr13%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr16%39%20–35yr10%29%35–55yr13%11%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,779

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNORTHEAST HOUSTON COMMUNITY CENTER — $9,000 · OtherNORTHEAST HOUSTON COMMUNITY CENTERPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER EAST — $6,500 · OtherPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER EASTVOICE OF THE MARTYRS INC — $5,500 · OtherVOICE OF THE MARTYRS INCAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY — $5,000 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYTHE NAVIGATORS — $4,000 · OtherTHE NAVIGATORSALONG SIDE MINISTRIES INC — $4,000 · OtherALONG SIDE MINISTRIES INCLOVE INC — $3,500 · OtherRAVI ZACHARIAS INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES — $3,000 · OtherSHOES Ministry — $2,500 · OtherNEW HORIZONS RANCH & CENTER INC — $2,500 · Other+10 more — $10,500 · Other+10 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $17,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEThe Master's Academy International Inc — $14,000 · ReligionThe Master's Academy Intern…Child Legacy International Inc — $4,000 · ReligionChild Legacy International …INSIGHT FOR LIVING — $3,000 · ReligionINSIGHT FOR LIVINGALONGSIDE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL — $3,000 · ReligionALONGSIDE MINISTRIES INTERN…Elijah Rising — $15,000 · Human ServicesElijah RisingHouston Pregnancy Help Center Inc — $6,000 · Human ServicesHouston Pregnanc…Love Network of Baytown — $3,000 · Human ServicesLove Network of …NDOTO — $8,500 · EducationNDOTOFRENCH CAMP ACADEMY — $6,500 · EducationFRENCH CAM…BREAKTHROUGH T1D — $6,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $3,500 · HealthNoahs House — $3,500 · Housing & ShelterPregnancy Assistance Center North — $3,500 · Housing & ShelterSTAR OF HOPE MISSION — $3,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$66,500Religion$41,000Human Services$24,000Education$15,000Health$10,000Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetElijah Rising — $15,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetThe Master's Academy International Inc — $14,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNDOTO — $8,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetFRENCH CAMP ACADEMY — $6,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $6,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Pregnancy Help Center Inc — $6,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetALONG SIDE MINISTRIES INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetChild Legacy International Inc — $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNoahs House — $3,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPregnancy Assistance Center North — $3,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLove Network of Baytown — $3,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetINSIGHT FOR LIVING — $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALONGSIDE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL — $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEW HORIZONS RANCH & CENTER INC — $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds Elijah Rising
  • Who funds The Master's Academy International Inc
  • Who funds NDOTO
  • Who funds FRENCH CAMP ACADEMY
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D
  • Who funds Houston Pregnancy Help Center Inc
  • Who funds ALONG SIDE MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds Child Legacy International Inc
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds Noahs House
  • Who funds Pregnancy Assistance Center North
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION
  • Who funds Love Network of Baytown
  • Who funds INSIGHT FOR LIVING
  • Who funds ALONGSIDE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds NEW HORIZONS RANCH & CENTER INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO17.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Texas Instruments Foundation · Servant Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Djdm Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph