Skip to content

· Private foundation

Disque Foundation LTD

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$48k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$61kHealth$48kHuman Services$24kAnimals$8kFood & Nutrition$8kEnvironment$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
International Care Ministries$9,789
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Palestine Children's Relief Fund$4,948
San Antonio Food Bank$3,998
CRIBS Foundation Inc$3,145
Ocean Conservancy$3,086
Help Heroes of Ukraine Inc Nfp$3,000
Pulse Charity$2,765
National Foundation for Cancer Research$2,500
Cancer Prevention Initiative Inc$2,500
Cancer Research Institute$2,309
Jaago Foundation$1,719
Ukraine Liberty Fund$1,084
Save the Children$799
Global Sanctuary For Elephants$771
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 87% of grant dollars ($157k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 13% that went abroad ($23k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Because International Corp: $4k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%SENIOR SERVICES: $315 → 15%Phillippines Orphanage Foundation Inc: $2k → 6%RESPECT TEAM: $6k → 12%United Help Ukraine: $1k → 6%KATE'S KART INC: $3k → 12%Kates Kart Inc: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
PA
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 13% of all-years giving ($23k)

7 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Ukraine$8k · 2 grants
OC$5k · 1 grant
Turkey$5k · 1 grant
Philippines$3k · 1 grant
Switzerland$3k · 1 grant
Bangladesh$151 · 1 grant
Kenya$50 · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53k · 7 repeat orgs$127k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
42

Total granted

$53k
$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+8%

Still filing today

71%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +10%
  • PF
    PARTNERS FOR ANDEAN COMMUNITY HEALTH INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $9k · revenue +28%
  • OC
    OCEAN CONSERVANCY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $6k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • RI
    RESPECT360 INC RESPECTTEAM
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue -1%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +8%
  • A(
    ALLPEOPLEBEHAPPY (F/K/A AMIZADE LTD)
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
2
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
3
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
4
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International
5
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
6
The One Campaign

The ONE Campaign ("ONE") continued its work to educate and raise awareness among the public, media and policymakers around the world about the importance of official development assistance and international programs that (Continued on…

Unclassified
7
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
8
Pact Inc

Pact is a nonprofit organization that builds evidence-based, data-driven, and community-led solutions for human development (continued in schedule o)

International
9
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
10
Children's Heartlink

We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.

—
11
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
12
Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc

For over 20 years, chai's mission has been to save lives and improve health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries around the world. we do this by enabling the government and private sector to strengthen and sustain quality health…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dogwood Animal Shelter Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
23/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $9,578 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPulse Charity: $7,605 · OtherPulse CharityPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND K: $4,980 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KTahanan ng Pagmamahal Children's Home: $4,600 · OtherTahanan ng Pagmamahal Children's HomeIndividual grant recipient: $4,555 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $3,998 · OtherSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANKCRIBS Foundation Inc: $3,145 · OtherInternational Committee of the Red Cross: $3,030 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $2,576 · OtherNational Foundation for Cancer Research: $2,500 · OtherOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $6,097 · OtherOCEAN CONSERVANCY+18 more: $15,026 · Other+18 morePARTNERS FOR ANDEAN COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $9,110 · InternationalPARTNERS FOR ANDEAN CO…RAZOM INC: $5,000 · InternationalRAZOM INCPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $4,948 · InternationalPALESTINE CHILDREN'S R…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $3,401 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR…HELP HEROES OF UKRAINE INC NFP: $3,000 · InternationalHELP HEROES OF UKRAINE…FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $2,945 · InternationalFEED MY STARVING CHILD…AGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA: $2,575 · InternationalAGA KHAN FOUNDATION US…CHILDREN'S SHELTER OF CEBU: $2,090 · InternationalCHILDREN'S SHELTER OF …+4 more: $3,033 · International+4 moreCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $9,593 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH …PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,926 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHO…COLON CANCER COALITION INC: $3,642 · HealthCOLON CANCER COA…CANCER PREVENTION INITIATIVE INC: $2,500 · HealthCANCER PREVENTIO…PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $2,150 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEAL…Cure Childhood Cancer Inc: $901 · Health+2 more: $941 · HealthRESPECT360 INC RESPECTTEAM: $6,212 · Human ServicesRESPECT360 INC…KATE'S KART INC: $5,580 · Human ServicesKATE'S KART IN…Because International Corp: $4,143 · Human ServicesBecause Intern…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,154 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIO…PHILIPPINES ORPHANAGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,974 · Human ServicesPHILIPPINES OR…United Help Ukraine Inc: $1,161 · Human Services+1 more: $315 · Human ServicesRACING FOR CANCER INC: $5,580 · PhilanthropyALLPEOPLEBEHAPPY (F/K/A AMIZADE LTD): $5,112 · PhilanthropyJAAGO FOUNDATION INC: $1,719 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIONAL CARE MINISTRIES: $9,789 · Food & NutritionANIMAL RESCUE & K9 CHARITIES INC: $2,284 · AnimalsTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $1,666 · AnimalsDogwood Animal Shelter Inc: $1,625 · AnimalsGLOBAL SANCTUARY FOR ELEPHANTS: $771 · Animals
Other$67,690International$36,102Health$25,653Human Services$22,539Philanthropy$12,411Food & Nutrition$9,789Animals$6,346

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL CARE MINISTRIES: $9,789 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $9,593 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS FOR ANDEAN COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $9,110 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRESPECT360 INC RESPECTTEAM: $6,212 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $6,097 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,926 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRACING FOR CANCER INC: $5,580 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetKATE'S KART INC: $5,580 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetRAZOM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $4,948 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBecause International Corp: $4,143 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $3,998 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLON CANCER COALITION INC: $3,642 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $3,401 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,154 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $2,945 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA: $2,575 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER PREVENTION INITIATIVE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE & K9 CHARITIES INC: $2,284 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $2,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S SHELTER OF CEBU: $2,090 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHILIPPINES ORPHANAGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,974 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetJAAGO FOUNDATION INC: $1,719 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $1,666 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDogwood Animal Shelter Inc: $1,625 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL CARE & EDUCATION: $1,448 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Help Ukraine Inc: $1,161 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUKRAINE LIBERTY FUND INC: $1,084 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCure Childhood Cancer Inc: $901 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $799 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUKRAINE HOUSE DC FOUNDATION INC: $790 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL SANCTUARY FOR ELEPHANTS: $771 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONQUERING CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE: $738 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMRS PHILIPPINES HOME FOR SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $677 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR SERVICES INC: $315 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $203 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHERAPISTS BEYOND BORDERS INC: $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOOKS FOR THE BARRIOS INC: $150 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ge Aerospace FoundationCT11× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Verizon Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Disque Foundation LTD funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Disque Foundation LTD. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Disque Foundation LTD?

Find your warmest path to Disque Foundation LTD through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Disque Foundation LTD’s filings →

More from the funding graph