Skip to content

· Public charity

Disaster Services Corporation-Society of St Vincent de Paul USA

To model the charism of the society of st.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$1.2MHuman Services$30kInternational$5k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $160,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,316,157 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,156,157 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SVDP - COUNCIL OF SACRAMENTO$40,000
SVDP - COUNCIL OF RHODE ISLAND$25,000
SVDP - COUNCIL OF OKLAHOMA CITY$20,000
SVDP - DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF EVANSVILLE$20,000
SVDP - COUNCIL OF WESTERN KY$20,000
SVDP - COUNCIL OF JACKSON MS$20,000
SVDP - COUNCIL OF CLEVELAND$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $531k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SVDP - COUNCIL OF SACRAMENTO: $40k → 12%SVDP - SACRED HEART CONFERENCE PLANADA CA: $23k → 19%St Vincent de Paul Council of Oklahoma: $10k → 13%Coastal District Council of the St Vincent De Paul: $10k → 12%SVDP - MANASOTA DISTRICT COUNCIL: $10k → 10%SVDP Council of Pensacola: $103k → 16%Des Moines Council of St Vincent De Paul Society: $10k → 10%SVDP - OUR LADY OF THE LAKE CONFERENCE MI: $10k → 16%SVDP - COUNCIL OF DETROIT: $20k → 21%SVDP - Council of Milwaukee: $10k → 17%SVDP - District Council of Nashville: $10k → 8%Society of St Vincent de Paul - St Mary's Confere: $15k → 18%SVDP - DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF EVANSVILLE: $20k → 11%SVDP - COUNCIL OF CLEVELAND: $15k → 17%SVDP Council of Chicago: $10k → 14%Society of St Vincent de Paul Trenton Diocesan Co: $20k → 6%Society of St Vincent de Paul Trenton Diocesan C: $25k → 11%COUNCIL OF HOUMA: $20k → 16%SVDP - Council of New Orleans: $5k → 23%SVDP - COUNCIL OF SACRAMENTO: $10k → 12%SVDP - COUNCIL OF PENSACOLA: $20k → 16%SVDP - Council of Nashville: $10k → 8%SVDP - Council of Houma Thibodaux: $5k → 16%Sacramento East District Council Society of St Vin: $65k → 12%SVDP Council of Pensacola: $10k → 16%Sacramento East District Council Society of St Vin: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
NJ
RI
CA
NE
KY
TN
NC
SC
OK
LA
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$758k · 13 repeat orgs$504k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
26

Total granted

$758k
$449k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+52%

Still filing today

62%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL PENSACOLA-TALLAHASSEE INC
    3× · 2018–2022 · $133k · revenue +41%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF THE JOILET DIOCESAN
    4× · 2018–2023 · $75k · revenue +8%
  • SD
    SACRAMENTO DISTRICT COUNCIL ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • SV
    St Vincent de Paul Sonoma County
    one grant, 2018 · $52k
  • SC
    SVDP - COUNCIL OF WESTERN KY
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • FB
    Father Bradley Mission Center
    one grant, 2018 · $38k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Vincent DePaul Soup Kitchen

Charity

—
2
Central Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul in the Diocese

Provide aid for families in need

Human Services
3
Society of St Vincent Depaul - St Thomas
Human Services
4
St Vincent De Paul Society of Epiphany Cathedral Conference Inc

To aid and assist those in need by providing rent, electrical, water, auto repair, and other basic assistance.

Human Services
5
St Vincent De Paul Society St Dominic Conference

We make in home visits to assist individuals with food, rent or utilities, medical expenses and other needed expenses.

Religion
6
Society of Saint Vincent De Paul Holy Spirit Conference

Assist low income individuals by offering second hand items at a low cost as well as providing shelter assistance to those in need.

—
7
Society of St Vincent De Paul District Council of

To provide assistance to the destitute.

Human Services
8
Society of St Vincent de Paul St Pius V Conference

The Society of St. Vincent de Paul is a world-wide Catholic organization that provides food and other services to the poor. It receives this funding primarily from Catholics. Local units of St. Vincent de Paul Society are called…

Human Services
9
St Vincent De Paul Pro-Life Homeless Inc

Help for homeless

—
10
Society of St Vincent Depaul - St Joseph Conference

Provide food baskets to 80+ families monthly january to november and a christmas basket to 285+ families in december

—
11
Society of St Vincent De Paul St Bernard Conference

Through person - to - person service, st. vincent de paul council of northern kentucky provides emergency assistance and basis necessities to individuals and families struggling to make ends meet.

Human Services
12
Society of Saint Vincent De Paul Nativity Conference Inc

The Society of St. Vincent de Paul is a worldwide organization of lay Catholics, following Christ's call to serve the poor, the suffering, and the deprived.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Society of St Vincent De Paul; the most unlike its peers is Manasota District Council St Vincent Depaul Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/38
Grantees still filing
24/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF THE JOILET DIOCESAN: $75,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF THE JOILET DIOCESA…Society of St Vincent de Paul Archdiocesan Council of Miami Inc: $70,000 · OtherSociety of St Vincent de Paul Archdiocesan Council …SVDP - COUNCIL OF OKLAHOMA CITY: $65,000 · OtherSVDP - COUNCIL OF OKLAHOMA CITYSt Vincent de Paul Sonoma County: $52,100 · OtherSt Vincent de Paul Sonoma CountySVDP - COUNCIL OF WESTERN KY: $50,000 · OtherSVDP - COUNCIL OF WESTERN KYSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL (SVDP) RHODE ISLAND: $40,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL (SVDP) RHODE ISLANDFather Bradley Mission Center: $37,500 · OtherFather Bradley Mission CenterSVDP - COUNCIL OF JACKSON MS: $25,000 · OtherSt Vincent de Paul Our Mother of Perpetual Help C: $20,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF VENICE: $20,000 · OtherDIOCESAN COUNCIL OF BEAUMONT SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $20,000 · OtherSt Vincent de Paul Society - Mary Mother of Merc: $20,000 · Other+7 more: $81,000 · Other+7 moreSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL PENSACOLA-TALLAHASSEE INC: $133,216 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL PENSACOLA-TA…SACRAMENTO EAST DISTRICT COUNCIL SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $90,000 · Human ServicesSACRAMENTO EAST DISTRICT COUNCIL SOCIETY OF ST VIN…SACRAMENTO DISTRICT COUNCIL ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $50,000 · Human ServicesSACRAMENTO DISTRICT COUNCIL ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOC…TRENTON DICESAN COUNCIL ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY St Mary Conference: $45,000 · Human ServicesTRENTON DICESAN COUNCIL ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY…PARTICULAR COUNCIL OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE: $30,000 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DC OF HOUMA THIB: $25,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE US SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL INC: $23,000 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL IN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF EVANSVILLE IN: $20,000 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL IN THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DETROIT: $20,000 · Human ServicesST VINCENT DE PAUL DISTRICT COUNCIL OF NASHVILLE TN INC: $20,000 · Human Services+11 more: $110,000 · Human Services+11 moreSOCIEDAD SAN VICENTE DE PAUL: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF WESTERN KY INC: $20,000 · Community Improvement
Other$575,600Human Services$566,216Housing & Shelter$100,000Community Improvement$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL PENSACOLA-TALLAHASSEE INC: $133,216 over 3y, 13% of budgetSOCIEDAD SAN VICENTE DE PAUL: $100,000 over 2y, 48% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF THE JOILET DIOCESAN: $75,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSociety of St Vincent de Paul Archdiocesan Council of Miami Inc: $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSACRAMENTO DISTRICT COUNCIL ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $50,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTRENTON DICESAN COUNCIL ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY St Mary Conference: $45,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL (SVDP) RHODE ISLAND: $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPARTICULAR COUNCIL OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE: $30,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DC OF HOUMA THIB: $25,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE US SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL INC: $23,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL IN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF EVANSVILLE IN: $20,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL IN THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DETROIT: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF WESTERN KY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL DISTRICT COUNCIL OF NASHVILLE TN INC: $20,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL SOCIETY OF SVDP CLEVELAND DIOCESE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF DALLAS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL OF ORLANDO SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCOASTAL DISTRICT COUNCIL OF THE ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMANASOTA DISTRICT COUNCIL ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BUFFALO & WESTERN NEW YORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL ARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOC OF ST VINCENT DE PAULARCHODIOCESAN COUNCIL OF: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetST VINCENT DEPAUL ARCHDIOCESAN COUNCIL OF NEW ORLEANS: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL BATON ROUGE COUNCIL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Council of the US Society of St Vincent de Paul IncMO47.1× affinity20 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Council of the US Society of St Vincent de Paul Inc · Community Foundation of Western Pennsylvania and Eastern Ohio · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Disaster Services Corporation-Society of St Vincent de Paul USA funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Disaster Services Corporation-Society of St Vincent de Paul USA. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $963k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Disaster Services Corporation-Society of St Vincent de Paul USA’s filings →

    More from the funding graph