Skip to content

· Public charity

Disabled American Veterans

We are dedicated to one single purpose: empowering veterans to lead high-quality lives with respect and dignity.

$7.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
61
Grants FY2025still arriving
52
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$40MRecreation & Sports$5.9MPublic Benefit$1.7MArts & Culture$97kHealth$75kScience & Tech$35kCrime & Legal$12kCommunity Improvement$10k
02FY2025 · 61 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 61 grants below total $6,795,935, the rows itemized in this filing. The $7,379,994 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $584,059 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $709k
  • $50k–250k26 grants · $2.8M
  • $250k+4 grants · $3.3M
$47,185
Median grant
52
States reached
$725M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP CORRAL$1,387,000
BOULDER CREST RETREAT$1,200,000
DEPT OF CALIFORNIA$382,678
DEPT OF TEXAS$287,672
NATIONAL CEMETERY ADMINISTRATION$225,906
DEPT OF PENNSYLVANIA$203,385
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS$202,792
DEPT OF MASSACHUSETTS$190,310
DEPT OF FLORIDA$159,073
DEPT OF OHIO$140,588
DEPT OF NORTH CAROLINA$131,953
DEPT OF MINNESOTA$110,049
DEPT OF ARIZONA$108,922
DEPT OF MICHIGAN$99,224
DEPT OF GEORGIA$90,989
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DAV Dept of Montana: $17k → 9%BOULDER CREST RETREAT: $1.2M → 7%DAV Dept of Montana: $17k → 9%Boulder Crest Retreat: $174k → 7%Boulder Crest Retreat: $150k → 7%Boulder Crest Retreat: $150k → 7%Boulder Crest Retreat: $150k → 7%Boulder Crest Retreat: $150k → 7%Boulder Crest Retreat: $150k → 7%Boulder Crest Retreat: $125k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$54M · 63 repeat orgs$496k to everyone else

63 repeat relationships: 58 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

63
9

Total granted

$54M
$466k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+41%

Still filing today

89%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public BenefitArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CAMP CORRAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6.7M · revenue +10% · 30% of their budget
  • BC
    BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +230%
  • DA
    DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF NEW YORK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +67% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

  • SO
    State of Minnesota Veterans Home
    one grant, 2019 · $251k
  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF VETERANS' RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATIONSgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue +72%
  • TC
    The Conference Board Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Disabled American Veterans of Texas Service Foundation
Human Services
2
Disabled American Veterans Dept of Utah

We are dedicated to a single purpose: empowering veterans to lead high-quality lives with respect and dignity. We accomplish this by ensuring that veterans and their families can access the full range of benefits available to them;…

Public Benefit
3
Disabled American Veterans 5

Veterans' assistance

—
4
Disabled American Veterans Inc

Fulfilling the promises to the men and women who served our Country

—
5
Disabled American Veterans

We are dedicated to one single purpose: empowering veterans to lead high-quality lives with respect and dignity. see schedule o for further details.

—
6
Amvets American Veterans Department of Florida Service Foundation Inc
Public Benefit
7
Vietnam Veterans of America Alaska

Assisting veterans with services-connected disabilities and related benefits. service officers to help find benefits for veterans.

—
8
Disabled American Veterans

Empowering Veterans to lead high quality lives with respect and dignity.

—
9
Disabled American Veterans

Made up exclusively of men and women disabled in our nations defense, the organization is dedicated to one single purpose - building better lives for all of our nations disabled veterans and their families.

—
10
Disabled American Veterans Lee Hartell 25 Chapter

Assist disabled veterans veterans and their dependents. foster fellowship among disabled veterans through participation in fraternal activities

Public Benefit
11
Disabled American Veteran Sonoma County Chapter 48

DAV is a nonprofit charity that provides lifetime support for veterans of all generations and their families. Nationally, it helps more than 1 million veterans in positive, life-changing ways each year. With over 1,200 chapters and more…

—
12
Disabled American Veterans

Helping needy Veterans and their families to pay for food, rent, medical needs, gas for vehicles, assist homeless veterans in special need, give rides to veteran to medical appointment, support local homeless for veterans. Assist State and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Disabled American Veterans Dept Co; the most unlike its peers is The Spacekind Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

34
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/64
Grantees still filing
36/64
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Department of Veterans Affairs: $8,249,419 · OtherDepartment of Veterans AffairsDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA: $3,413,923 · OtherDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIADISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF TEXAS: $2,551,908 · OtherDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF TEXASDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA INC: $2,308,345 · OtherDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA INCDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF NEW YORK INC: $1,513,375 · OtherDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,483,219 · Other+49 more: $23,284,782 · Other+49 moreCAMP CORRAL: $6,688,792 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP CORRALBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $2,249,000 · Human ServicesDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF MONTANA: $134,737 · Human ServicesDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT CO: $837,769 · Public BenefitHILLVETS FOUNDATION: $335,000 · Public BenefitDisabled American Veterans Department of Nevada: $300,712 · Public BenefitDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF KANSAS INCORPORATED: $286,773 · Public BenefitDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF UTAH: $184,766 · Public BenefitDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF ND DAV: $153,719 · Public BenefitDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF DELAWARE INC: $101,291 · Public Benefit+3 more: $121,350 · Public BenefitNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF VETERANS' RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATIONS: $60,000 · Arts & CultureINTREPID MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureThe Spacekind Foundation: $25,000 · Arts & CultureThe Conference Board Inc: $50,000 · Community ImprovementJoseph House Inc: $20,000 · HealthOperation Honor Corp: $5,000 · Employment
Other$42,804,971Youth Development$6,688,792Human Services$2,383,737Public Benefit$2,321,380Arts & Culture$145,000Community Improvement$50,000Health$20,000Employment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAMP CORRAL: $6,688,792 over 9y, 30% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA: $3,413,923 over 9y, 35% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF TEXAS: $2,551,908 over 9y, 44% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA INC: $2,308,345 over 9y, 31% of budgetBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $2,249,000 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF NEW YORK INC: $1,513,375 over 9y, 30% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,483,219 over 9y, 18% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $1,316,753 over 9y, 34% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF VA INC: $1,311,491 over 9y, 4.0% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF OHIO: $1,217,964 over 9y, 23% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF NORTH CAROLINA: $1,206,751 over 9y, 58% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS OF MICHIGAN: $972,747 over 9y, 7.6% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF MINNESOTA INC: $950,728 over 9y, 9.1% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF AZ: $919,608 over 9y, 26% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF WASHINGTON: $838,184 over 9y, 77% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT CO: $837,769 over 9y, 49% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS - DEPT OF NJ: $832,216 over 9y, 62% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF GEORGIA: $828,418 over 9y, 53% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS: $778,530 over 9y, 44% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF MARYLAND: $776,623 over 9y, 32% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF MISSOURI INC: $757,275 over 9y, 6.7% of budgetDisabled American Veterans National Service Foundation: $748,544 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF KENTUCKY INC: $719,596 over 9y, 70% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS: $685,071 over 9y, 58% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS OF ALABAMA INC: $679,389 over 9y, 29% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF INDIANA: $647,043 over 9y, 28% of budgetDISABLED AMER VETERANS OF TENN #41: $620,859 over 9y, 51% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $547,658 over 9y, 11% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF ARKANSAS: $377,377 over 9y, 47% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETS DEPT OF CT: $369,058 over 9y, 18% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS: $346,402 over 9y, 33% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF OREGON: $341,109 over 9y, 47% of budgetHILLVETS FOUNDATION: $335,000 over 8y, 22% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS: $302,968 over 9y, 40% of budgetDisabled American Veterans Department of Nevada: $300,712 over 9y, 43% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF KANSAS INCORPORATED: $286,773 over 9y, 40% of budgetDisabled American Veterans Department of Maine: $266,143 over 9y, 32% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF NE INC: $265,080 over 9y, 23% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS: $251,164 over 9y, 73% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS 47: $248,657 over 9y, 55% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF NH INC: $242,064 over 9y, 54% of budgetDisabled American Veterans Dept of Hawaii: $241,198 over 9y, 78% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF IOWA: $238,000 over 9y, 25% of budgetDEPARTMENT OF MISSISSIPPI DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS: $193,287 over 9y, 50% of budgetDisabled American Veterans Department of Idaho: $185,984 over 9y, 38% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF UTAH: $184,766 over 9y, 27% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $164,816 over 9y, 16% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF ND DAV: $153,719 over 9y, 38% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMP CORRAL ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF VA INC ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF OHIO ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF NORTH CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF MINNESOTA INC ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF AZ ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT CO ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS - DEPT OF NJ ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF GEORGIA ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF MARYLAND ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF MISSOURI INC ↗
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans National Service Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS OF ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF INDIANA ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMER VETERANS OF TENN #41 ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF ARKANSAS ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETS DEPT OF CT ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF OREGON ↗
  • Who funds HILLVETS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS ↗
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans Department of Nevada ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF KANSAS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans Department of Maine ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Disabled American Veterans National Service FoundationKY45.4× affinity19 shared granteesties to 0 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Disabled American Veterans National Service Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Disabled American Veterans funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Disabled American Veterans. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Disabled American Veterans’ filings →

    More from the funding graph