· Public charity
Disabled American Veterans National Service Foundation
Develops financial resources for the assistance, aid, maintenance, care, support and rehabilitation of sick and injured veterans and their dependents, either directly or by contributions to the service programs of the disabled american veterans national organization or its departments or chapters.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $84k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $426k
- $250k+2 grants · $5.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Disbaled American Veterans | $5,023,200 |
| US Department of Veterans Affairs | $590,530 |
| Department of Nebraska | $131,700 |
| Department of Wyoming | $96,000 |
| Department of Vermont | $78,100 |
| Department of Montana | $62,400 |
| Department of Nevada | $58,100 |
| Department of Tennessee | $27,100 |
| Department of Maine | $27,000 |
| Department of North Dakota | $16,700 |
| Department of Delaware | $12,800 |
| Disbaled American Veterans | $8,758 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $314k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DADisabled American Veterans8× · 2017–2024 · $33M · revenue +29%
- DADISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF NE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $635k · revenue +56% · 65% of their budget
- DADISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF MONTANA7× · 2018–2024 · $516k · revenue +58% · 35% of their budget
Funded once
- DADISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT COone grant, 2023 · $144k · revenue -86%
- DADISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS 47one grant, 2017 · $36k · revenue -56% · 34% of their budget
- DADISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF ARKANSASone grant, 2019 · $14k · revenue -11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization helps veterans and their families improve their quality of life.
To provide services to individuals who were disabled due to or during their military service.
Assist military veterans and their dependents in obtaining various benefits.
To provide assistance to Disabled American Veterans, their families and survivors. We assist with transportation to and from medical appointments. We also provide free assistance with benefit claims.
Assisting disabled American veterans
Empowering Veterans to lead high quality lives with respect and dignity.
We are dedicated to a single purpose: empowering veterans to lead high-quality lives with respect and dignity. We accomplish this by ensuring that veterans and their families can access the full range of benefits available to them;…
Assistance to disabled american veterans including assistance with claims, information and literature and assist local chapters and coordinate state convention
Veterans' assistance
Provide assistance to veterans
DAV is a nonprofit charity that provides lifetime support for veterans of all generations and their families. Nationally, it helps more than 1 million veterans in positive, life-changing ways each year. With over 1,200 chapters and more…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Disabled American Veterans Dept Co and the most unlike its peers is Disabled American Veterans Dept of Hawaii. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Disabled American Veterans ↗
- Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF NE INC ↗
- Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF MONTANA ↗
- Who funds Disabled American Veterans Department of Nevada ↗
- Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS ↗
- Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds Disabled American Veterans Department of Maine ↗
- Who funds DISABLED AMER VETERANS OF TENN #41 ↗
- Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF KANSAS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF GEORGIA ↗
- Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT CO ↗
- Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF VA INC ↗
- Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF DELAWARE INC ↗
- Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF UTAH ↗
- Who funds Disabled American Veterans Dept of Hawaii ↗
- Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS 47 ↗
- Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF ND DAV ↗
- Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPT OF ARKANSAS ↗
- Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Disabled American Veterans
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Disabled American Veterans National Service Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Disabled American Veterans National Service Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Disabled American Veterans National Service Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.