Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Direction Home Akron Canton Area Agency on Aging

DIRECTION HOME AKRON CANTON AREA AGENCY ON AGING & disabilities provides older adults, people with disabilities and their caregivers long-term care choices and consumer protection so they can achieve the highest quality of life.

$57M
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$906k
Largest
01What you fund
0163% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$13MCrime & Legal$808kHealth$585kHousing & Shelter$102kPhilanthropy$64kOther$8.7M
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 33 grants below total $3,436,433 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $57,002,909 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $53,566,476 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $248k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.5M
$32,268
Median grant
2
States reached
$32M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VANTAGE AGING$905,947
AXESSPOINTE COMMUNITY$584,580
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$225,667
THOMAS LANE INC$200,258
FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$170,950
CASLEO CORPORATION$150,084
PURFOODS LLC$130,214
SIMPLY EZ HOME DELIVERED MEALS OF NORTHEASTERN OHIO LLC$116,565
THE SALVATION ARMY-CANTON$105,419
JG BAHAS INC$104,670
NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORP OF AKRON$101,853
YWCA OF ALLIANCE$99,184
COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES$97,422
MINERVA SENIOR CENTER$74,873
Individual grant recipient$63,982
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $13.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MINERVA AREA COMMISSION ON AGING: $101k → 12%REBUILDING TOGETHER NORTHEAST OHIO: $7k → 13%MINERVA SENIOR CENTER: $75k → 12%MINERVA AREA COMMISSION ON AGING: $64k → 12%MINERVA AREA COMMISSION ON AGING: $50k → 12%JIN HUO COMMUNITY INC: $18k → 13%MINERVA AREA COMMISSION ON AGING: $47k → 12%ASIA INC: $18k → 13%MINERVA AREA COMMISSION ON AGING: $38k → 12%ASIA INC: $17k → 13%MINERVA AREA COMMISSION ON AGING: $35k → 12%ASIA INC: $17k → 13%MINERVA AREA COMMISSION ON AGING: $29k → 12%ASIA INC: $16k → 13%ASIA INC: $12k → 13%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES DBA MOBILE MEALS: $1.1M → 12%JIN HUO COMMUNITY INC: $6k → 13%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES DBA MOBILE MEALS: $954k → 12%ASIA INC: $5k → 13%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES DBA MOBILE MEALS: $828k → 12%ASIA INC: $5k → 13%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES DBA MOBILE MEALS: $763k → 12%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES OF PORTAGE COUNTY: $701k → 12%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES DBA MOBILE MEALS: $677k → 12%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES OF PORTAGE COUNTY: $332k → 12%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES DBA MOBILE MEALS: $214k → 12%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $171k → 12%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES DBA MOBILE MEALS: $14k → 12%VANTAGE AGING FKA MATURE SERVICES INC: $1.2M → 13%VANTAGE AGING FKA MATURE SERVICES INC: $1.2M → 13%VANTAGE AGING FKA MATURE SERVICES INC: $986k → 13%MATURE SERVICES INC: $954k → 13%VANTAGE AGING FKA MATURE SERVICES INC: $920k → 13%VANTAGE AGING: $906k → 13%VANTAGE AGING FKA MATURE SERVICES INC: $642k → 13%MATURE SERVICES INC FKA SENIOR WORKERS' ACTION PROGRAM: $286k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$23M · 42 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

42 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
26

Total granted

$23M
$228k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
0%

Still filing today

26%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $837k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyCrime & LegalHealthHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VA
    VANTAGE AGING
    8× · 2017–2025 · $7.1M · revenue +12%
  • CL
    COMMUNITY LEGAL AID SERVICES
    8× · 2017–2025 · $808k · revenue +111%
  • YW
    YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ALLIANCE OHIO
    8× · 2017–2025 · $578k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • AT
    ACCESS TO INDEPENDENCE
    one grant, 2024 · $49k · revenue 0%
  • JL
    JONESY'S LAWN CARE
    one grant, 2024 · $33k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY-CANTON
    one grant, 2017 · $32k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Area Agency On Aging District 7 Inc

Assisting individuals to maintain independence and personal choice by providing resource options and services

2
Ohio District 5 Area Agency On Aging Inc

The ohio district 5 area agency on aging, inc. provides leadership, collaboration, coordination and services to older adults, people with disabilities, their caregivers and resource networks that support individual choice, independence and…

3
Stark County Council On Aging

Provide elderly services to allow persons to stay in their own homes

Human Services
4
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
5
Direction Home Akron Canton Area Agency On Aging

Direction home akron canton area agency on aging & disabilities provides older adults, people with disabilities and their caregivers long-term care choices and consumer protection so they can achieve the highest quality of life.

Human Services
6
Tuscarawas County Committee On Aging

To provide opportunities to individualsover 50 years of age in tuscarawas county, ohiothrough healthy living, independence, physical andmental health, education, and recreational programs

Human Services
7
Aging and Disability Resource Center of Brown County Inc

The adrc of brown county supports older adults, adults with disabilities, and caregivers through education, advocacy, and resources. we connect people to answers, in our center, by phone, or at home, so everyone can live with diginity and…

8
Holmes County Council On Aging Inc

To promote the physical, emotional, intellectual, and social well being of the senior citizens of holmes county, ohio through the delivery of supportive services such as meal and transportation programs thereby enhancing the quality of…

Human Services
9
Psa 3 Agency On Aging

To promote the highest quality of life, area agency on aging 3 will provide access to a network of services, education, and advocacy as the region's aging and disability resource expert.

10
Preble County Council On Aging

We will partner with our community in assuring the best quality of life for our seniors now and into the future. our vision is to advocate and provide resources for seniors to remain healthy and independent.

Human Services
11
Aging Services Inc

The mission of aging services inc. is to enhance the lives and dignity of cleveland county senior adults by providing programs, services and referrals that assist and promote healthy independent living.

Human Services
12
Area Office On Aging of Northwestern Ohio Inc

The area office on aging of northwestern ohio, inc. promotes the health, well-being and safety of older adults, persons with disabilities and family caregivers to foster independence.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Direction Home Akron Canton Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Access to Independence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VANTAGE AGING — $7,053,275 · Human ServicesVANTAGE AGINGFAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $5,743,076 · Human ServicesFAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC+4 more — $559,474 · Human ServicesTHOMAS LANE — $1,517,313 · OtherTHOMAS LANEALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION — $1,196,279 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONMEALS ON WHEELS OF STARK & WAYNE COUNTIES — $952,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OF STARK & WAYNE COUNTIESALPHA PHI ALPHA HOMES INC — $897,424 · OtherALPHA PHI ALPHA HOMES INCYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ALLIANCE OHIO — $578,282 · OtherYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF AL…The Salvation Army — $513,242 · OtherThe Salvation ArmySIMPLY EZ HOME DELIVERED MEALS OF NORTHEASTERN OHIO LLC — $455,272 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $373,158 · Other+56 more — $2,204,859 · Other+56 moreCOMMUNITY LEGAL AID SERVICES — $808,443 · Crime & LegalAXESS FAMILY SERVICES INC — $584,580 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $101,853 · Housing & ShelterDIRECTION HOME AKRON CANTON FOUNDATION — $61,555 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF WAYNE AND HOLMES CO — $2,280 · Philanthropy
Human Services$13,355,825Other$8,687,829Crime & Legal$808,443Health$584,580Housing & Shelter$101,853Philanthropy$63,835

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVANTAGE AGING — $7,053,275 over 8y, 11% of budgetFAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $5,743,076 over 8y, 4.9% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF STARK & WAYNE COUNTIES — $952,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEGAL AID SERVICES — $808,443 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ALLIANCE OHIO — $578,282 over 8y, 19% of budgetMINERVA AREA COMMISSION ON AGING — $438,817 over 8y, 46% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR BETTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC — $184,774 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC — $89,560 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetDIRECTION HOME AKRON CANTON FOUNDATION — $61,555 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetACCESS TO INDEPENDENCE — $48,852 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetJ R COLEMAN SENIOR OUTREACH — $37,370 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetJIN HUO COMMUNITY INC — $23,672 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetAKRON SUMMIT COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $22,424 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER NORTHEAST OHIO INC — $7,425 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WAYNE AND HOLMES CO — $2,280 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VANTAGE AGING
  • Who funds FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF STARK & WAYNE COUNTIES
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LEGAL AID SERVICES
  • Who funds AXESS FAMILY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ALLIANCE OHIO
  • Who funds MINERVA AREA COMMISSION ON AGING
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR BETTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
  • Who funds ASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC
  • Who funds DIRECTION HOME AKRON CANTON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ACCESS TO INDEPENDENCE
  • Who funds J R COLEMAN SENIOR OUTREACH

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stark Community FoundationOH20.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stark Community Foundation · Akron Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Stark County · United Way of Summit and Medina · Sisler McFawn Foundation Pfdn · Burton D Morgan Foundation Inc · Lehner Family Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton · The Welty Family Foundation · Gar Foundation · Wayne County Community Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Direction Home Akron Canton Area Agency on Aging funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Direction Home Akron Canton Area Agency on Aging?

    Find your warmest path to Direction Home Akron Canton Area Agency on Aging through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph