Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dil Se Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$522k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$376k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Human Services$984kEducation$957kReligion$406kYouth Development$150kInternational$64kPhilanthropy$56kFood & Nutrition$10kHealth$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $117k
  • $250k+1 grant · $376k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$723k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JANODAYA TRUST$375,684
THE SIGNATRY$30,000
ASSEMBLIES OF GOD$20,000
HELPING HANDS$18,360
ARCADIA UNIVERSITY$18,332
BLOOM INDIA$10,000
SCHOLARS OF FINANCE$10,000
ELEVATE YOUR GAME INC$10,000
DEEPER CHRISTIANITY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
MOVEMENTORG$5,000
CAMPUS CRUSADE$5,000
THE TRANSFORMATION PROJECT$5,000
NEO$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving — 70% of grant dollars ($1.8M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 30% that went abroad ($799k) is mapped below.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $936k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BLOOM INDIA: $257k → 6%BLOOM INDIA: $12k → 6%BLOOM INDIA: $10k → 6%BLOOM INDIA: $353k → 8%BLOOM INDIA: $305k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WI
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
KS
TN
NC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US — 30% of all-years giving ($799k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$799k · 5 grants

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 18% of Dil Se Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Dil Se Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 43% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 11 repeat orgs$368k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
27

Total granted

$2.3M
$333k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+19%

Still filing today

45%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalReligionHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    Bloom India Development Foundation Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $936k · revenue +6% · 43% of their budget
  • EY
    ELEVATE YOUR GAME INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $150k · revenue +37% · 53% of their budget
  • NC
    NEW COVENANT CHURCH MINISTRIES INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $65k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • NC
    NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $112k
  • NC
    NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $56k · revenue ×103 · 99% of their budget
  • LC
    LEXINGTON CHRISTIAN ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $26k · revenue +25%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
3
Church Transformation Network Inc

CTNs mission is to partner with national churches to economically and effectively train large numbers of Christian leaders in their calling character and ministry competency so that local communities of faith remain biblical faithful and…

Religion
4
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
5
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
6
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

7
Compassion International Incorporated

Compassion exists to release children from poverty in Jesus' name. Compassion serves all children, regardless of religion, race, ethnicity, or gender.

International
8
Christar International Inc

Christar international serves as a catalyst to the network of christar ministries by facilitating and encouraging partnerships with churches who sen dout men and women who proclaim the gospel for life-giving transformation in communitiesw…

Religion
9
Institute of Chinese Studies

ChinsSource is a trusted partner and platform for educating the global church on critical issues facing the church and ministries in China and for connecting Christians inside and outside China to advance the kingdom of God globally

International
10
Adventive Cross Cultural Initiatives

ACCI serves pioneering Christians, empowering them to proclaim the gospel, fulfill their God-given visions, and advance the kingdom of God. ACCI longs for a world where lives are transformed through the Holy Spirit, where new disciples are…

Religion
11
Childcare Worldwide

Childcare Worldwide (CW) transforms children's lives by exposing them to the gospel of Jesus Christ, providing for their physical needs, and sponsoring their education. We connect sponsors with children through Christ-based life centers.…

International
12
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scholars of Finance and the most unlike its peers is The Signatry Corporation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports Booster Organi…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Independent K-8 SchoolsChristian Missionary Organi…Jewish Community FederationsCancer Support OrganizationsCommunity Health CentersSouth Asian Cultural and Sp…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%18%5–10yr19%32%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%65%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%1%35–55yr16%8%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,536

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JANODAYA TRUST — $798,626 · OtherJANODAYA TRUSTNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION — $112,000 · OtherNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATIONHELPING HANDS INC — $47,560 · OtherTHE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD — $45,000 · Other+22 more — $149,500 · Other+22 moreBloom India Development Foundation Inc — $936,078 · Human ServicesBloom India Development Foundation Inc+1 more — $246 · Human ServicesThe Signatry Corporation Inc — $120,000 · ReligionDEEPER CHRISTIANITY INC — $21,000 · ReligionThe Denver Institute — $20,000 · ReligionELEVATE YOUR GAME INC — $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentNEW COVENANT CHURCH MINISTRIES INC — $64,970 · EducationARCADIA UNIVERSITY — $39,730 · EducationLEXINGTON CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $26,200 · EducationSCHOLARS OF FINANCE — $10,000 · EducationThe New York City Leadership Center Inc — $5,000 · Education+1 more — $3,350 · EducationNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC — $56,000 · PhilanthropyCHILDRENS NETWORK INTERNATIONA — $5,000 · PhilanthropyACTION FOR POST-SOVIET JEWRY INC — $10,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc — $10,000 · InternationalLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC — $5,000 · InternationalNEVERTHIRST INC — $3,500 · International
Other$1,152,686Human Services$936,324Religion$161,000Youth Development$150,000Education$149,250Philanthropy$61,000International$28,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBloom India Development Foundation Inc — $936,078 over 5y, 43% of budgetELEVATE YOUR GAME INC — $150,000 over 4y, 53% of budgetNEW COVENANT CHURCH MINISTRIES INC — $64,970 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC — $56,000 over 1y, 99% of budgetARCADIA UNIVERSITY — $39,730 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEXINGTON CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $26,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDEEPER CHRISTIANITY INC — $21,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetThe Denver Institute — $20,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSCHOLARS OF FINANCE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetACTION FOR POST-SOVIET JEWRY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGAPE GLOBAL HEALTH FOR HAITI INC — $10,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetTHE TRANSFORMATION PROJECT — $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCHILDRENS NETWORK INTERNATIONA — $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetThe New York City Leadership Center Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEVERTHIRST INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC — $3,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCompassionate Care ALS Inc — $246 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Bloom India Development Foundation Inc
  • Who funds ELEVATE YOUR GAME INC
  • Who funds NEW COVENANT CHURCH MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ARCADIA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LEXINGTON CHRISTIAN ACADEMY
  • Who funds DEEPER CHRISTIANITY INC
  • Who funds The Denver Institute
  • Who funds SCHOLARS OF FINANCE
  • Who funds ACTION FOR POST-SOVIET JEWRY INC
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc
  • Who funds AGAPE GLOBAL HEALTH FOR HAITI INC
  • Who funds THE TRANSFORMATION PROJECT
  • Who funds CHILDRENS NETWORK INTERNATIONA
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds The New York City Leadership Center Inc
  • Who funds NEVERTHIRST INC
  • Who funds BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS16.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dil Se Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dil Se Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dil Se Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph