Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dieter Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$139kEducation$96kFood & Nutrition$86kHealth$75kHousing & Shelter$75kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kHuman Services$29kRecreation & Sports$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNICEF$11,000
ACRES OF HOPE$6,000
NEVADA COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$6,000
LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF$6,000
AUBURN INTERFAITH FOOD CLOSET$6,000
FALCON FOUNDATION$5,000
PLACER HILLS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT$5,000
MEADOW VISTA FRIENDLY NEIGHBORS$4,000
SENIORS FIRST (NETWORK FOR GOOD)$4,000
GOLD COUNTY WILDLIFE RESCUE$3,600
AMERICAN RED CROSS$3,000
AMERICARES$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
COLLA VOCE OF THE SIERRAS$1,275
PLACER LAND TRUST$1,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 22% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CARING CHOICES: $4k → 18%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $500 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $500 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $350 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $155 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $300 → 7%GATHERING INN: $1k → 6%GATHERING INN: $1k → 6%GATHERING INN: $1k → 6%GATHERING INN: $1k → 6%PLACER ARC: $1k → 6%PLACER ARC: $1k → 6%PLACER ARC: $1k → 6%GATHERING INN: $1k → 6%PLACER ARC: $1k → 6%PLACER ARC: $1k → 6%PLACER ARC: $1k → 6%GATHERING INN: $795 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$582k · 33 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
19

Total granted

$582k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+4%

Still filing today

70%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionEnvironmentInternationalEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    9× · 2017–2025 · $97k · revenue +76%
  • NC
    Nevada County Habitat For Humanity
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +210%
  • AI
    AUBURN INTERFAITH FOOD CLOSET INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $35k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +5%
  • E
    ELCA
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • BD
    BIG DAY OF GIVING
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
2
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
5
Sacramento Region Community Foundation

The Sacramento Region Community Foundation leads, serves, and inspires enduring philanthropy for a just and vibrant Sacramento region.

Philanthropy
6
The Sierra Fund

The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.

Environment
7
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
8
California Association of Food Banks

California association of food banks (cafb) is a non-profit public benefit corporation located in oakland, california. together with its 41-member foodbanks, cafb is the largest charitable hunger-relief and anti-hunger leader in the state.…

Food & Nutrition
9
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
10
Rainforest Action Network

Rainforest Action Network (RAN) works toward a world where the rights and dignity of all communities are respected and where healthy forests, a stable climate and wild biodiversity are protected and celebrated.

Environment
11
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
12
Climate Action Reserve

The Climate Action Reserve develops and implements trusted market-based programs to advance climate action for people and planet. A pioneer in carbon accounting, the Reserve promotes and fosters the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG)…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels America; the most unlike its peers is The Falcon Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/39
Grantees still filing
27/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLACER HILLS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT: $59,954 · OtherPLACER HILLS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICTACRES OF HOPE: $34,750 · OtherACRES OF HOPEAMERICAN RED CROSS: $29,850 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSMEADOW VISTA FRIENDLY NEIGHBORS: $18,500 · OtherMEADOW VISTA FRIENDLY NEIGHBORSCOLFAX HIGH SCHOOL: $16,000 · OtherCOLFAX HIGH SCHOOLMEADOW VISTA COMMUNITY CENTER: $16,000 · OtherMEADOW VISTA COMMUNITY CENTERGOLD COUNTY WILDLIFE RESCUE: $13,800 · OtherSENIORS FIRST (NETWORK FOR GOOD): $10,000 · Other+33 more: $86,652 · Other+33 moreUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $97,046 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UN…LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $28,295 · InternationalLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INCWORLD VISION INC: $7,429 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $5,750 · InternationalUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $60,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…PLACER HILLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $8,675 · EducationPLACER HILLS …SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $3,600 · EducationNevada County Habitat For Humanity: $50,098 · Housing & ShelterNevada Co…AUBURN INTERFAITH FOOD CLOSET INC: $35,180 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more: $2,000 · Food & NutritionFUGEES FAMILY INC: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE GATHERING INN: $6,495 · Human ServicesPLACER ARC: $6,000 · Human ServicesCaring Choices Inc: $4,000 · Human ServicesCharity Navigator: $1,805 · Human Services
Other$285,506International$138,520Education$72,275Housing & Shelter$50,098Food & Nutrition$42,180Recreation & Sports$20,000Human Services$18,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $97,046 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNevada County Habitat For Humanity: $50,098 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetAUBURN INTERFAITH FOOD CLOSET INC: $35,180 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $28,295 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFUGEES FAMILY INC: $20,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMEADOW VISTA COMMUNITY CENTER: $16,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetPLACER HILLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $8,675 over 5y, 12% of budgetTHE FALCON FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $7,429 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL PUBLIC RADIO FDBA KXPR/KXJZ INC: $7,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSolar Cookers International: $7,030 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPLACER LAND TRUST: $6,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GATHERING INN: $6,495 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetColla Voce of the Sierra Inc: $6,050 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetPLACER ARC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $5,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $5,380 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCaring Choices Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $3,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAuburn State Theatre Incorporated: $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER PLACER: $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $2,102 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLACER NATURE CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator: $1,805 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNorCal Resist: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGold Country Wildlife Rescue Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFEEDING THE FOOTHILLS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends Foreevery A Cat Sanctuary: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPasadena Community Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD LITERACY CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Placer County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals SPCA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Nevada County Habitat For Humanity ↗
  • Who funds AUBURN INTERFAITH FOOD CLOSET INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds FUGEES FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds MEADOW VISTA COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PLACER HILLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FALCON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL PUBLIC RADIO FDBA KXPR/KXJZ INC ↗
  • Who funds Solar Cookers International ↗
  • Who funds PLACER LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE GATHERING INN ↗
  • Who funds Colla Voce of the Sierra Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLACER ARC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Caring Choices Inc ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds Auburn State Theatre Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER PLACER ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds PLACER NATURE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sacramento Region Community FoundationCA31.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Placer Community Foundation · Teichert Foundation · Lee and Carol Tager Family Foundation · The Arp Family Foundation · The George W Bauer Family Foundation · Armrod Charitable Foundation · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dieter Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dieter Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc: 47% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dieter Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph