How much did DIABETES CARE FOUNDATION grant in FY2025?

Education$12MHealth$1.9MArts & Culture$200kPhilanthropy$154kInternational$55kFood & Nutrition$45kHuman Services$29kHousing & Shelter$25kCrime & Legal$24kOther$1.1M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

jesuit catholicresearchworkingtraffickingeducationcreightonhealthcare

2021

partnershipsarts artsresearchawarenessataxiaworkingtrafficking

2022

plattefoodeducationhealthcare

2023

plattefoodhealthcareeducation

2025

food

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k6 grants · $30k
$10k–50k6 grants · $95k
$50k–250k3 grants · $210k
$250k+3 grants · $3.5M

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$25M

Total assets

Largest grants

TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$1,450,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$1,400,000
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$700,000
HUBER NEURODISCOVERY COLLABORATIVE$100,000
CUES SCHOOL SYSTEM$60,000
VILLAGE FIRE DEPARTMENT$50,000
HEALING GIFT FREE CLINIC$20,000
SALVATION ARMY - LOCAL NE BRANCH$20,000
FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND$15,000
PROJECT HARMONY$15,000
OPEN DOOR MISSION$15,000
UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS$10,000
CHAPELWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
EAST SPRING BRANCH FOOD PANTRY$5,000
SACRED HEART CATHEDRAL$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$13M · 32 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$13M

$298k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%

+36%

Still filing today

53%

44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.4M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

UO
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
6× · 2020–2025 · $9.2M · revenue +35%
CU
CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY
4× · 2020–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +33%
CH
CHI HEALTH FOUNDATION
5× · 2020–2024 · $285k · revenue +9%

Funded once

CU
CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY
one grant, 2021 · $70k
HA
HIGHER AIM
one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue -6%
CH
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -63%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Nebraska Methodist Hospital

Improving the quality of life through excellence in healthcare.

Health

Unmc Physicians

Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research, and extraordinary patient care.

Health

Heartland Regional Medical Center

To improve population health outcomes in our region by providing the right care, at the right time, place and cost.

Health

The Children's Mercy Hospital

Excellence in healthcare for children

Health

Central Iowa Hospital Corporation

Improving the health of the community through healing, caring and teaching.

Health

Avera Health

Promotion of health

Health

Nebraska Methodist Health System Inc

Operated exclusively for the benefit of nebraska methodist hospital & its related organizations.

Health

Omaha Children's Museum

The underlying mission of the organization is to engage children's imaginations and create excitement about learning.

Arts & Culture

The Children's Mercy Hospital Foundation

To provide support for the activities and mission of The Children's Mercy Hospital.

Health

Children's Hospital Medical Center

Provision of pediatric healthcare to patients.

Health

Omaha Conservatory of Music

The omaha conservatory of music is a non-profit school that builds a diverse musical community to enrich lives through education and performance.

Arts & Culture

Community Health Center of Se Kansas

To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chi Health Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Creighton University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3%1/33

the rest of the field

15%

3,569/23,966

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

27/28

Grantees still filing

20/28

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$11,830,191Health$1,865,000Other$1,204,000Arts & Culture$200,000Philanthropy$154,000International$55,000Food & Nutrition$45,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationNE20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Duncan Family Trust · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · The Giving 3 Foundation · Dixon Family Foundation · Assurity Life Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · Nebraska Children & Families Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation DIABETES CARE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE COALTION ON HUMAN TRAFFICKING.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 821886368 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE COALTION ON HUMAN TRAFFICKING, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 65% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Diabetes Care Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Diabetes Care Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

DIABETES CARE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Diabetes Care Foundation?

More from the funding graph

DIABETES CARE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Diabetes Care Foundation?

More from the funding graph